Cryoablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Microwave Ablation in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy

August 23, 2018 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Tumor Ablation in Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy

This phase II trial studies how well cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or microwave ablation works in treating patients with metastatic sarcoma stable on chemotherapy. Cryoablation kills tumor cells by freezing them. Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. Microwave ablation kills tumor cells by heating them to several degrees above body temperature.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed high-grade metastatic sarcoma that has been stable on 6-12 cycles of one chemotherapeutic regimen (cytotoxic or biologic) although a change in chemotherapy is allowed if it is a result of toxicity/tolerability rather than progression. A patient must not have evidence of progression at any time while on chemotherapy in order to be eligible for this trial.
  • Measurable disease defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥10 mm with CT scan, PET CT, or MRI exam.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%)
  • Normal bone marrow and organ function as defined below:

    • Leukocytes ≥ 3,000/mcL
    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcl
    • Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcl
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x IULN or 3x IULN with normal ALT and AST in patients with Gilbert's disease
    • AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤ 3.0 x IULN
    • Creatinine less than the institutional upper limit of normal OR creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2
    • INR<1.5 or patient off Coumadin at the time of ablation
  • No more than 10 treatable lesions as evaluated by an experienced interventional oncologic radiologist for eligibility and lesion accessibility as the ablation of more than 10 lesions becomes technically infeasible. These lesions must be treated in a two- to three-week time period from initial interventional radiology evaluation. Lung and liver lesions can range from 1 cm to 7 cm for a single lesion and no greater than 5 cm for multiple lesions. There are no size criteria for the osseous lesions.
  • The lesions will be amenable to a safe, ultrasound/computed tomographic/fluoroscopic guided percutaneous approach. The targeted metastases must be sufficiently separable from the central nervous system, major peripheral motor nerves, bowel, and bladder. All lesions must be amenable to treatment.
  • If patients have received radiation therapy, there must be a one-month washout period.
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of ablation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she must inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Patient (or legally authorized representative if applicable) must be able to understand and willing to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of other malignancy ≤ 5 years previous with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which were treated with local resection only, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or localized prostate cancer.
  • Receiving any other investigational agents simultaneously or within 3 weeks following ablation procedure.
  • Known brain metastases. Patients with known brain metastases must be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events.
  • Intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Patients whose treatment plans include continuing chemotherapy after ablation as per the treating physician, as ablation therapy is meant to serve as maintenance therapy in lieu of chemotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment (ablation)
  • Patients undergo cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or microwave ablation of each lesion.
  • Patients complete pain survey (BPI-Short form) and quality of life questionnaires (FACT-G7)
  • Microwave ablation will be predominantly used on metastatic soft tissue lesions and will include use of Covidien's Evident™ MWA System. Microwave ablation is performed under ultrasound, CT, and occasional fluoroscopic guidance with CT fluoroscopy available for intermittent use in probe placement and CT monitoring of ablation.
  • Microwave antennae from Covidien (Mansfield, MA) are either introduced into the lesion co-axially through a bone biopsy needle or directly into the lesions that are amenable to such, i.e., soft tissue, lung, liver, and large lytic lesions with extensive bone destruction.
  • Cryoablation is performed under ultrasound, CT and occasional fluoroscopic guidance with CT fluoroscopy available for intermittent use in cyroprobe placement and CT monitoring of ablation.
  • Cryoprobes from Endocare Inc. (Irvine CA) or Galil Medical (Arden Hills MN) are either introduced into the lesion co-axially through a bone biopsy needle or directly into the lesions that are amenable to such, i.e., soft tissue, lung, liver, and large lytic lesions with extensive bone destruction.
Other Names:
  • Cryosurgery
  • Cryosurgical ablation
-Radiofrequency ablation will be predominantly used on metastatic spine lesions and will include use of the Dfine STAR ablation probe. This probe will be placed coaxially through an introducer needle into the spinal metastatic lesion.
-Prior to ablation, 1 day post-ablation, 1 month post-ablation (from first procedure if more than 1 is done), and time of disease progression
-Prior to ablation, 1 day post-ablation, 1 month post-ablation (from first procedure if more than 1 is done), and time of disease progression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Defined as the percentage of patients with no progression (local recurrence of an ablated lesion or the appearance of a new lesion) after ablation.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Assessed up to 5 years
-Defined as time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to the time of death
Assessed up to 5 years
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Lack of Energy
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I have a lack of energy"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Nausea
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I have nausea"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Worry That the Condition Will Get Worse
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I worry that my condition will get worse"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Enjoy Life
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I am able to enjoy life"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Sleep Well
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I am sleeping well"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Contentment of the Participant's Qualify of Life
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I am content with the quality of my life right now"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Pain
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
  • Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression.
  • The question participant was asked was "I have pain"
  • 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much
  • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Change in Pain Following Ablation Procedure
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Final assessment at time of disease progression. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean BPI scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05.
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian Van Tine, M.D., Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 3, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 8, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on Microwave ablation

3
Subscribe