A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

January 17, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Disease Activity and Safety of Treatment With Actemra (Tocilizumab) Administered as Subcutaneous Injection in Adult RA Patients.

A multi-center, open-label single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab administered as a single, weekly injection in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Combination therapy with methotrexate or other non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was permitted.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beer Sheva, Israel, 8410101
      • Beer Yaacov, Israel, 6093000
      • Haifa, Israel, 3109601
      • Haifa, Israel, 3339419
      • Haifa, Israel, 34362
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9112001
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91240
      • Kfar Saba, Israel, 44281
      • Petach Tikva, Israel, 4941492
      • Petach Tikva, Israel, 4937211
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 5262000
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 5262100
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults >/= 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR (2010) criteria
  • Previously treated with the following: three non-biologic DMARDs, and not treated with any biologic agent OR one biologic agent (alone or in combination with non-biologic DMARDs), and discontinued that agent for a reason
  • Oral corticosteroids (</= 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) and non-biologic DMARDs are permitted if on a stable dose regimen for >/= 4 weeks prior to Baseline
  • Use of effective contraception throughout the study as defined by protocol; female patients of childbearing potential must not be pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of serious, uncontrolled, clinically significant medical conditions
  • History of diverticulitis, diverticulosis requiring antibiotic treatment, or chronic ulcerative lower gastrointestinal (GI) disease that might predispose to perforation
  • Current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infections
  • Any infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 4 weeks of Screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of Screening
  • Clinically significant findings on lab tests and/or hepatitis B or C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screenings
  • Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatments within the previous 3 years
  • Evidence of active malignant disease, malignancies diagnosed within the previous 10 years, or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 20 years
  • History of alcohol, drug, or chemical abuse within 1 year prior to Screening
  • Neuropathies or other conditions that might interfere with pain evaluation
  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to Screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following Baseline
  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, including systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disorder, scleroderma, polymyositis, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA (e.g., vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis or Felty's syndrome). Secondary Sjögren's syndrome with RA is permitted
  • Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in-Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA, and/or RA before the age of 16
  • Prior history of current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • Exposure to tocilizumab (either IV or subcutaneous administration) at any time prior to Baseline
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or five half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of Screening
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents approved therapies, with alkylating agents such as chlorambucil, or with total lymphoid irradiation
  • Treatment with IV gamma globulin, plasmapheresis within 6 months of Baseline
  • Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tocilizumab
Adults with rheumatoid arthritis will be treated with tocilizumab for 24 weeks followed by an 8 week follow-up period without treatment.
162 milligram (mg) administered subcutaneously once weekly for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • RoActemra/Actemra

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission and CDAI Low Disease Activity
Time Frame: Week 24
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The index was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = number of swollen joints using the 28-joint count (SJC28) + number of tender joints using the 28-joint count (TJC28) + patient global assessment of disease (PGA) based on 10 centimeter [cm] Visual Analog Scale [VAS] + physician global assessment of disease (PhGA) based on 10 cm VAS. VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Total CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. Remission is defined as CDAI ≤2.8 and Low Disease Activity (LDA) is defined as 2.8< CDAI ≤10.
Week 24
Change From Baseline in CDAI
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The index was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = number of swollen joints using the 28-joint count (SJC28) + number of tender joints using the 28-joint count (TJC28) + patient global assessment of disease (PGA) based on 10 centimeter [cm] Visual Analog Scale [VAS] + physician global assessment of disease (PhGA) based on 10 cm VAS. VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Total CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission and SDAI Low Disease Activity
Time Frame: Week 24
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was an index for measuring disease activity in RA and had a good correlation with the DAS28. The index was calculated using the following formula: SDAI: SJC28 + TJC28 + PGA (10 cm VAS) + PhGA (10 cm VAS + C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L). VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity. An SDAI score of ≤ 3.3 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤ 11.0 represents low disease activity.
Week 24
Change From Baseline in SDAI
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was an index for measuring disease activity in RA and had a good correlation with the DAS28. The index was calculated using the following formula: SDAI: SJC28 + TJC28 + PGA (10 cm VAS) + PhGA (10 cm VAS + C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in mg/L. VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte-Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The DAS28-ESR score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count on 28 joints (TJC28), swollen joint count on 28 joints (SJC28), patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity based on visual analog scale (VAS) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/hr). VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Total possible score ranged from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20%, 50% and 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Scores (ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70)
Time Frame: Week 24
An ACR20 response requires at least 20% improvement compared to baseline in SJC (based on 66 joints) and TJC (based on 68 joints) as well as at least 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: 1) PGA pain VAS, 2) PGA VAS; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) with 20 questions consisting of 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and 5) CRP in mg/L or ESR in mm/hr. ACR50 and ACR70 responses are defined in a similar way except that they required a 50% and 70% improvement from baseline, respectively. VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity).
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good to Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Time Frame: Week 24
Response was determined using EULAR criteria based upon DAS28 absolute scores at the assessment visit and the DAS28 reduction from the reference visit. Participants with a score lesser than or equal to (</=) 3.2 and reduction of greater than (>) 1.2 points were assessed as having a 'good' response. Participants with a score >3.2 with reduction of >1.2 points, or a score <=5.1 with reduction of >0.6 to <=1.2 points, were assessed as having a 'moderate' response. Participants with a score >5.1 with reduction of >0.6 to <=1.2 points, or any score with reduction <=0.6 points, were assessed as non-responders with response recorded as 'none.'
Week 24
Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The number of tender joints (based on 68 joints) and swollen joints (based on 66 joints) were counted at each visit. TJC was determined by identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion; no tenderness =0, tenderness =1. SJC was determined by identifying swelling; no swelling =0, swelling =1. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Participants were either on tocilizumab monotherapy or tocilizumab plus non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Reported here is the percentage of participants on tocilizumab monotherapy at baseline and the change from baseline at Week 24. A positive change from baseline at Week 24 indicates the percentage of participants, who discontinued DMARDs during the study.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (PGA VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PGA VAS represents the participant's overall assessment of their current disease activity on a 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Pain VAS
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Patient Pain VAS represents the participant's assessment of his/her current level of pain on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The HAQ-DI evaluates participant-reported quality of life using 8 categories: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other common activities and 20 questions. Each category contains multiple questions, which were answered using a 4-point scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The overall index score was an average of the individual item responses and may range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate more difficulty in daily living activities. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The symptom-specific measure FACIT-F assesses chronic illness therapy with special emphasis on fatigue in the past 7 days and consists of 5 dimensions: 1) physical well- being, 2) social/family well-being, 3) emotional well-being, 4) functional well-being, and 5) additional concerns. Each of the questions is categorically answered using the scales 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much for a total possible FACIT-F score of 0 to 52. The figures are reversed during score calculations, so that higher score values indicate more favorable conditions. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 24
Total Scores on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The HDRS is a clinician-administered depression assessment and consists of 17 items with a total score range from 0 to 54. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. HAS is a clinician-administered assessment to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms and consists of 14 items with a total score range from 0 to 56. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline, Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: Up to Follow-up Week 32
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not considered related to the drug. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. AESIs are AEs that occur in categories of special interest with regard to the benefit-risk profile and overall safety of a drug. The following nine categories of AESIs were identified for tocilizumab: 1) serious and/or medically significant infections, 2) myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, 3) gastrointestinal perforations, 4) malignancies, 5) anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity reactions, 6) demyelinating disorders, 7) stroke, 8) serious and/or medically significant bleeding events, and 9) serious and/or medically significant hepatic events.
Up to Follow-up Week 32
Percentage of Participants Who Required Dose Modifications or Discontinued Study Due to AEs
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Up to Week 24
Immunogenicity: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tocilizumab Antibodies
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal
Reported is the percentage of participants positive for anti-tocilizumab antibodies in the confirmatory anti-tocilizumab antibody assay, which followed an initial anti-tocilizumab screen. Participants, who withdrew from the study
Baseline, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal
Immunogenicity: Tocilizumab Levels
Time Frame: Week 12, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal
Week 12, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal
Immunogenicity: Change From Week 1 in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Levels
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 12, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal
A positive change from Week 1 indicates an increase in sIL-6R levels.
Week 1, Week 12, Week 24, Follow-up Week 32 and Early Withdrawal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on tocilizumab

Subscribe