Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of 6 Cycles vs 8 Cycles in Node Positve Breast Cancer (Neo-shorter)

August 26, 2017 updated by: Sung-Bae Kim, Asan Medical Center

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With 3 Cycles of FEC Followed by 3 Cycles of Docetaxel Versus 4 Cycles of Adriamycin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by 4 Cycles of Docetaxel in Node-positive Breast Cancer

Various regimens and schedule as neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were investigated and sequential treatment of anthracyclines followed by taxanes, which has shown superior pathologic complete respone (pCR) rate (NSABP-B27 study) is widely used until now. Considering the proven efficacy and tolerable toxicity of 3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of Docetaxel (FEC3-D3) compared to FEC 6 cycles in adjuvant chemotherapy (PACS 01 trial), use of FEC3-D3 regimen in neoadjuvant setting will be feasible with acceptable efficacy and further reduce the duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To investigate feasibility of FEC3-D3 regimen in neoadjuvant setting in terms of comparable efficacy and shorter duration across all subtypes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Performance status 0 or 1
  • Clinically stage 2 or 3 with histologically proven lymph node involvement
  • Tumor or lymph node greater than 1.5 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for any malignancy
  • Documented history of cardiac disease contraindicating anthracyclines
  • Currently active infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: FEC3-D3

3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of Docetaxel

Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks Epirubicin 100 mg/m2, every 3 weeks Cyclophosphamide 500, every 3 weeks

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks
Drug: FEC3-D3

Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks Epirubicin 100 mg/m2, every 3 weeks Cyclophosphamide 500, every 3 weeks

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks

Other Names:
  • Pharmorubicin
  • Cytoxan
  • 5-FU
  • Docetaxel
No Intervention: AC4-D4

4 cycles of Adriamycin plus Cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxel

Adriamycin 60 mg/m2, every 3 weeks Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, every 3 weeks

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pathologic complete response (pCR) between two arms
Time Frame: within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery
within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3 year-disease free survival between two arms
Time Frame: 3 year after surgery
  1. Correlation of pCR and Ki-67 expression at baseline and D14 tumor specimen
  2. 3 year-disease free survival
  3. Correlation of pCR and biomarkers such as Ki-67 expression
3 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Asan Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-0116

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on FEC3-D3

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Latvia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe