The Value of Early Mobilization and Physiotherapy Following Wrist Fractures Treated by Volar Plating

August 21, 2020 updated by: Ola-Lars Hammer, University Hospital, Akershus

A prospective, randomized study investigating the possible benefits of immediate mobilization and frequent physiotherapy following a wrist fracture treated by volar plating.

The current study will test the following null hypothesis:

There is no significant difference between patients who receive a cast for the first 2 weeks postoperatively and then instructions in home exercises and patients who receive a cast for 2-3 days postoperatively and then have frequent sessions with a physiotherapist following volar locked plating for a extraarticular distal radius fracture, as evaluated by self-reported satisfaction after 3 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will focus on patients treated with volar locked plating following an extraarticular distal radius fracture.

In a prospective manner the investigators intend to analyze hand function, x-ray and other parameters in order to investigate whether early mobilization and a targeted program of physiotherapy postoperatively leads to a better functional result and earlier return to a normal activity level. The investigators analysis will also focus on the safety of early mobilization with regards to possible detrimental effects on the osteosynthesis, bony union, associated soft-tissue injuries and functional outcome. The investigators also intend to assess the cost of more intensive follow-up and physiotherapy and do a cost-benefit evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lorenskog
      • Oslo, Lorenskog, Norway, 1478
        • Akershus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Position prior to primary reduction:

  • Dorsal tilt > 25°
  • Radial shortening> 6 mm
  • Radial inclination reduced by more than 15°
  • Radiocarpal malalignment > 7 mm
  • Dorsal /volar metaphyseal comminution
  • Volar displacement of the distal fragment(= Smith's fracture)

Position after initial reduction:

  • Dorsal tilt > 5°
  • Radial shortening > 4 mm
  • Radial inclination reduced by more than 10°
  • Radiocarpal malalignment > 4 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures
  2. Previous distal radius/ulna-fracture and/or disabling hand injury of the same extremity
  3. Previous distal radius fracture or other disabling injury to the contralateral side
  4. Dementia or other psychiatric illness which affect compliance
  5. Congenital anomaly
  6. Bilateral radius fracture
  7. Concurrent fractures to the upper or lower extremities or other illness which affect movement of the extremities
  8. Systemic joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis
  9. Patients who do not speak Norwegian
  10. Pathological fracture other than osteoporotic fracture
  11. Congenital bone disease (for example osteogenesis imperfecta)
  12. Age below 18 and above 70
  13. Patients not belonging to Akershus University Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early mobilization
Early weightbearing and physiotherapy
Experimental: Late mobilization
Late mobilization, none-weightbearing and home exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short version of "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand" (Quick-DASH)
Time Frame: 2 years
The Quick-DASH score is a measure of patient reported satisfaction score and is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone.
2 years
Short Form 36 (SF36)
Time Frame: 2 years
The SF-36 score is a quality of life measure and is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
Time Frame: 2 years
The PRWE-score is a measure of patient reported satisfaction and is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years
Euro-Qol 5 dimension score (EQ-5d)
Time Frame: 2 years
The EQ-5d score is a quality of life measure and is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 years
The VAS-score is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years
Radiological findings (X-ray)
Time Frame: 2 years
Angles, incongruity and other radiological parameters are compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 2 yars
Wrist range of motion is compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 yars
Cost analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
The cost of treatment, sick-leave, complications and other socioeconomical parameters are compared between the group receiving early mobilization, weightbearing and physical therapy and the group receiving late mobilization and home exercises alone
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jan Erik Madsen, Professor, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

Clinical Trials on Early mobilization

3
Subscribe