ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study

February 7, 2022 updated by: Integra LifeSciences Corporation

Evaluation of the Use of Transvaginal Resorbable Biologic Mesh as Compared to Traditional Non-Mesh Surgical Repair for Treating Pelvic Floor Disorders

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix as compared to native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients are evaluated throughout a 3 year follow-up period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

161

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford School of Medicine
    • Florida
      • Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
        • Cleveland Clinic Florida
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology
    • New Jersey
      • Edison, New Jersey, United States, 08837
        • Premier Urology Group
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Atlantic Health System
      • Princeton, New Jersey, United States, 08540
        • Princeton Urogynecology
      • Whippany, New Jersey, United States, 07981
        • Garden State Urology
    • New York
      • Poughkeepsie, New York, United States, 12601
        • Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • The Christ Hospital
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18103
        • The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
    • Tennessee
      • Franklin, Tennessee, United States, 37067
        • Center for Pelvic Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject's leading edge of POP is at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba ≥ 0 or Bp ≥ 0 or C ≥ 0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C ≥ -½ total vaginal length (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the apical compartment).
  • Subject is seeking surgical intervention for symptomatic POP, which is defined as experiencing symptoms of vaginal bulging or pelvic heaviness. Vaginal bulge or pelvic heaviness will be considered present if a subject responds "yes" (≥1) to PFDI-20, question 3.
  • Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials (relevant to subjects in MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Group only).
  • Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis.
  • Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit).
  • Subject has chronic systemic pain syndrome (e.g. fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome).
  • Subject has a systemic connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica).
  • Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
  • Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical).
  • Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area.
  • Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months).
  • Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for POP (colpoclesis).
  • Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position.
  • Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study.
  • Subject is to planning to undergo concurrent surgical treatment of prolapse using mesh other than the MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix
surgical mesh device
Active Comparator: Native Tissue Repair
suture repair
Other Names:
  • suture repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The safety and effectiveness of surgical success/failure.
Time Frame: 3 years
The composite outcome of surgical success evaluates anatomic outcome, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment pelvic organ prolapse.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The surgical success/failure based on an alternate definition of success.
Time Frame: 3 years
A composite outcome of surgical success based on an alternate definition of anatomic success, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 11, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix

Subscribe