VIBRating vs Traditional Therapy for Treatment of ENTry Dyspareunia (VIBRENT)

May 16, 2025 updated by: Medstar Health Research Institute

VIBRENT- VIBRating vs Traditional Therapy for Treatment of ENTry Dyspareunia

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the use of a novel vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic device ("Kiwi") improves sexual function in sexually active women aged 18 and older with genito-pelvic pain and penetration disorder (GPPPD) more effectively than traditional vaginal dilators.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the use of the Kiwi device lead to higher sexual function scores compared to traditional vaginal dilators
  2. Does the Kiwi device improve sexual distress, pain, and overall symptom severity more effectively than traditional vaginal dilators?

Researchers will compare the Kiwi vibrating device to traditional cylindrical vaginal dilators to assess whether the Kiwi device results in greater improvements in sexual function and symptom relief.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to use either the Kiwi device or traditional vaginal dilators.
  • Use the assigned device three times per week for 15 minutes per session over four weeks.
  • Complete surveys before and after the study, including assessments of sexual function, pain, and overall improvement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic device (the "Kiwi") compared to traditional vaginal dilators in improving sexual function outcomes in sexually active women aged 18 and older with genito-pelvic pain and penetration disorder (GPPPD).

The primary objective is to determine whether the Kiwi device leads to higher Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores after four weeks of use compared to traditional dilators.

Secondary objectives include assessing improvements in:

  • Sexual distress (Female Sexual Distress Scale - Desire/Arousal/Orgasm, FSDS-DAO)
  • Pelvic pain (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire, VPAQ-screen subscale)
  • Overall symptom severity (Patient Global Impression of Severity, PGI-S)
  • Perceived improvement (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I)

Participants (n=60) will be randomized into two arms:

  1. Kiwi device group - a commercially available vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic product.
  2. Traditional dilator group - a standard graduated cylindrical vaginal dilator set.

Participants will use their assigned device three times per week for 15 minutes per session over a four-week period. Data will be collected at baseline and at the end of the study using validated questionnaires.

The study hypothesizes that participants using the Kiwi device will demonstrate greater improvements in FSFI scores compared to those using traditional vaginal dilators, reflecting enhanced sexual function and reduced symptom severity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Recruiting
        • MedStar Health
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Helen Y Zhang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Eun Sook Choi, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lauren Cosgriff, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cheryl Iglesia, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ariana Davis, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Assigned female at birth
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (per ICD-10 diagnosis codes: F52.5 Vaginismus not due to a substance or known physiological condition, F52.6 Dyspareunia not due to a substance or known physiological condition, N94.1 Dyspareunia, N94.2 Vaginismus, N94.81 Vulvodynia)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior use of a therapeutic vaginal device used to treat GPPPD
  • Unmanaged genitourinary syndrome of menopause
  • History of pelvic radiation
  • History of genital tract malignancy
  • History of female genital mutilation
  • History of prior surgery for prolapse or incontinence, including vaginal mesh or midurethral sling mesh
  • Silicone allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Kiwi (Commercially available therapeutic vibrating pelvic floor product)

Kiwi is a therapeutic vibrating pelvic floor product that includes an option for external massage and stimulation. The V- shaped massager, is designed to bridge anatomical variety and has three main massage ends.

  1. The cylindrical end is comparable in application to traditional vaginal dilators. However, one significant difference is its tapered shape; this allows for continuous and gradual diameter increase, as opposed to discrete increments in the traditional dilator sets. The tapered end has an optional vibration mode with 4 different intensity settings. This cylindrical shape can also be used as a tool to apply external pressure point massage to the muscles of the urogenital triangle, such as the perineal muscle and the bulbospongiosus muscles.
  2. A wider flat surface area has an additional motor to apply vibration to the glans clitoris. This end can also be used for massage.
  3. The rounded bottom end of Kiwi can be used as a broad area massage tool.
Once randomized to either the vibrating pelvic floor massage arm or the traditional vaginal dilator arm, they will receive instructions on frequency of device use and will use manufacturer's instructions for specifics of device use. We will not dictate more specific instructions on use, nor is this standard of care, as every patient is unique and will need to retain autonomy in terms of how quickly they progress in the use of the product. They will then complete a survey at 4 weeks which includes measures of sexual function and pelvic pain, as well of global impressions of improvement in their symptoms.
Other Names:
  • PFPT
  • Pelvic floor physical therapy
  • pelvic floor massage
Active Comparator: Silicone Dilator Arm
A commercially available set of graduated cylindrical vaginal dilators. The standard of care is a 6-piece, progressive-sizing, silicone dilator set. Dimensions of the silicone dilators are (WxH): (1) 0.7"x4.75", (2) 0.9"x5.25", (3) 1.0"x5.45", (4) 1.1"x5.85", (5) 1.3"x6.35", (6) 1.5"x6.85". These dilators are not battery powered, have no buttons, and no removable pieces.
Once randomized to either the vibrating pelvic floor massage arm or the traditional vaginal dilator arm, they will receive instructions on frequency of device use and will use manufacturer's instructions for specifics of device use. We will not dictate more specific instructions on use, nor is this standard of care, as every patient is unique and will need to retain autonomy in terms of how quickly they progress in the use of the product. They will then complete a survey at 4 weeks which includes measures of sexual function and pelvic pain, as well of global impressions of improvement in their symptoms.
Other Names:
  • PFPT
  • Pelvic floor physical therapy
  • pelvic floor massage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Time Frame: Four weeks
FSFI is considered the gold standard for the measurement of sexual function in women. It's a 19-item questionnaire that uses a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater levels of sexual functioning on the respective item. To score the measure, the sum of each domain score is multipled by a domain factor ratio (0.6 for desire, 0.3 for arousal, 0.3 for lubrication, 0.4 for orgasm, 0.4 for satisfaction, and 0.4 for pain) in order to place all domain tools on a comparable scale. The subsequent scores are summed to derive a total FSFI score. The possible range of scores is 2-36. A score less than or equal to 26.55 reflects clinically relevant sexual dysfunction.
Four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FSDS-DAO (Female Sexual Distress Scale- Distress/Arousal/Orgasm) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Four weeks
The Female Sexual Distress Scale - Distress/Arousal/Orgasm (FSDS-DAO) Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess sexually related distress in women, with a particular focus on distress associated with arousal and orgasmic difficulties. The FSDS-DAO consists of 15 items that assess three key domains: sexually related distress, arousal difficulties, and orgasmic dysfunction. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always), with higher total scores indicating greater distress and dysfunction.
Four weeks
Primary Outcome Questionnaire (PEQ)
Time Frame: Four weeks
This is a seven item questionnaire in which each question queries whether the subject has in the last four weeks attempted intercourse, insertion of one or two fingers (by self or by partner), insertion of other objects (by self or by partner). There are four responses to choose from for each question: not attempted, attempted but not successful, attempted and sometimes successful, attempted and always successful.
Four weeks
PGI-S- Patient Global Impression of Severity
Time Frame: Four weeks
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a single item questionnaire to assess a person's impression of disease severity. For purposes of this trial, it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now" on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "normal" to (4) "severe". The PASS threshold PGI-S score is < 3.
Four weeks
Patient Global Impression Of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: Four weeks
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a single item questionnaire to assess an individual's impression of change in urinary symptoms. For purposes of this trial the PGI-S has been adapted by removing "taking medication" and it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now, compared with how it was before you began this study" on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "very much better" to (7) "very much worse". The PASS threshold PGI-I score is < 3.
Four weeks
VPAQ-screen Subscale: Self Stimulation/Penetration Interference (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire- Screening Form)
Time Frame: Four weeks
The Self Stimulation/Penetration Interference and Q7 (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire- Screening Form) asks the subject "How often do the following situations/activities cause vulvar pain?" The following situations/activities are queried: using tampons, solitary masturbation, masturbation while partner is present, solitary self penetration with fingers, solitary self penetration with sex toy.
Four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cheryl Iglesia, MD, Medstar Washington Hospital Center National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participant data will be collected and analyzed as an aggregate for any results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on Pelvic floor therapy

Subscribe