Trigger Point Injections and Pelvic Rehabilitation for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Myalgia and Sexual Pain

December 27, 2013 updated by: Mary South, University of Cincinnati

Assessment Of Pain Subsidence And Sexual Function Amelioration Using Either Pelvic Rehabilitation Or Trigger Point Injections

The purpose of this study is to evaluate which treatment option for pelvic floor pain allows for improved sexual function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pelvic floor pain may be treated with trigger point injections with medications (steroids and local anesthetics) that are FDA approved for injection into muscles. The alternative is a noninvasive treatment option using pelvic rehabilitation which involves vaginal muscle massage. Both treatment options have been used and reported; however, rapidity of improvement and return to normal sexual function have not been assessed. This study assigns patients to either treatment option randomly and the sexual function is assessed based on standardized sexual function questionnaires as well as pain ratings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • Recruiting
        • Division of Urogynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pelvic pain
  • pelvic floor myalgia
  • dyspareunia
  • female
  • age > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • interstitial cystitis
  • vaginal lesions / ulcerations
  • prior trigger point injections in the past 6 months
  • prior pelvic rehabilitation in the past 6 months
  • laparoscopically documented endometriosis / pelvic adhesions or adhesive disease
  • documented pelvic inflammatory disease identified within the past 6 months
  • documented sexually transmitted disease within the past 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pelvic Rehabilitation
Pelvic Rehabilitation will be conduction on weekly basis for a total of 6 weeks
Pelvic floor massage will be performed on a weekly basis by a licensed physiotherapist specialized in pelvic floor pelvic therapy
Other Names:
  • Pelvic floor massage
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Trigger Point Injections
Trigger point injections will be administered on weekly basis for a total of 6 weeks
The mixture is injected into the levator muscles, with half the volume on each side of the pelvic musculature.
Other Names:
  • Triamcinolone Acetonide-Total dose of 40mg, Volume 2 ml
  • Bupivacaine Hydrochloride-Strength 0.5%, Volume 18ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in rating of pain from baseline until the end of the study according to the Iowa Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10
Patients will be asked to rate their current pain prior to initiation of the treatment at the visits, at the start of the study and after the completion of the study, using the 10 point Iowa Pain scale.
Baseline, Week 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in sexual function between visit 1 and visit 10
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10
Change in sexual function based on the female sexual function index (19 questions, one final score, maximum score of 36) where the patients fill a questionnaire prior to the first treatment session and after the completion of the treatment at week 10.
Baseline, Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary South, MD, University of Cincinnati

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspareunia

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Rehabilitation

Subscribe