- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02027311
Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP
Etomidate With Meperidine vs Midazolam With Meperidine for Sedation During Endodscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP)
Recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA(gamma-Aminobutyric acid)-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system.
The investigators are now trying to investigate that etomidate with meperidine combination regimen is superior to the midazolam with meperidine more effective and less harm on sedation during the ERCP procedure.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram) is an uncomfortable and time-consuming procedure compared to other endoscopic procedures. Most ERCP procedure had been performed in sedation using tranquilizers and pain-killers.
Until recently, midazolam and opioid combination regimen recognized as a standard therapy is widely used, but the sedative effect is insufficient and intermittent paradoxical reaction has been questioned. Another drug, such as propofol, has been known that the sedative effect is superior one of the midazolam but disappointed due to narrow therapeutic range of respiratory distress and absence of antagonist. Meanwhile, recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system.
For these advantages, this short acting sedative drug has been widely used in the emergency room during minor operation and in the operation room for induction. However, research on the efficacy during ERCP was not yet published.
In this regards, the purpose of the investigators study is to prove the efficacy of etomidate for sedation and to establish new evidence based sedation guidelines during ERCP procedure.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Jeju Special Self-Governing Province
-
Jeju-si, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Korea, Republic of, 690-766
- 1Digestive Disease Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who are scheduled diagnositic or therapeutic ERCP.
- Age : more than 20 and less than 90 years old
- ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) classificiation : I, II, III
Exclusion Criteria:Patients following
- Refuse to be enrolled
- ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists)classification IV, V
- Breast feeder
- The mentally ill
- Drug abuser
- Hypersensitivity to sedative or opioids
- Alcohol intoxication or dependency
- Body mass index (BMI) 36kg/m2 or more
Unstable vital sign
- tachypnea, respiration rate more than 25/min or less than 10/min
- Oxygen saturation : 90% or less
- Systolic blood pressure : less than 90 mmHg or more than 180 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure : less than 50 mmHg or more than 100 mmHg
- Heart rate : more than 120 beat/min or less than 50 beat/min.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Etomidate
This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine.
The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg.
Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc).
In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted.
|
This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine.
The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg.
Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc).
In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted.
Other Names:
Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg.
Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Midazolam
This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine.
The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV.
Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam.
In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%.
|
Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg.
Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
Other Names:
This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine.
The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV.
Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam.
In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Intervention
Time Frame: Throughout the whole ERCP procedure
|
The frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases.
|
Throughout the whole ERCP procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Event of Hypoxia
Time Frame: Every 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phase
|
Hypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter < 90%
|
Every 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phase
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: BYUNG HYO CHA, Dr., Cheju Halla General Hospital, Doreongno 65, Jeju-si Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Korea 690-766
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
- Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D, Overley C, Kinser K, Bratcher L, Kareken D. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):815-25. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124636. Erratum In: Gastrointest Endosc 2002 Aug;56(2):324.
- Carrasco G. Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care. 2000;4(4):217-25. doi: 10.1186/cc697. Epub 2000 Jul 13.
- Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson AA, Miller KM, Durkalski V, Aisenberg J. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):967-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00500.x.
- Ruth WJ, Burton JH, Bock AJ. Intravenous etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;8(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00539.x.
- Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, Anderson MA, Banerjee S, Dominitz JA, Fanelli RD, Gan SI, Harrison ME, Ikenberry SO, Shen B, Stewart L, Khan K, Vargo JJ. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Nov;68(5):815-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.029. No abstract available.
- Yamazaki N, Ogawa K. [Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH)]. Kokyu To Junkan. 1976 Nov;24(11):949-55. No abstract available. Japanese.
- Bell GD. Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990 Apr;4(2):103-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1990.tb00455.x.
- Galletly D, Forrest P, Purdie G. Comparison of the recovery characteristics of diazepam and midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):520-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.5.520.
- Yuksel O, Parlak E, Koklu S, Ertugrul I, Tunc B, Sahin B. Conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: midazolam or midazolam plus meperidine? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;19(11):1002-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282cf5167.
- Radaelli F, Meucci G, Terruzzi V, Spinzi G, Imperiali G, Strocchi E, Lenoci N, Terreni N, Mandelli G, Minoli G. Single bolus of midazolam versus bolus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Mar;57(3):329-35. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.104.
- Reimann FM, Samson U, Derad I, Fuchs M, Schiefer B, Stange EF. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):239-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-134.
- Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):233-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-96.
- Falk J, Zed PJ. Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1272-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E008. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
- Hunt GS, Spencer MT, Hays DP. Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: prospective, randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 May;23(3):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.042.
- Denny MA, Manson R, Della-Giustina D. Propofol and Etomidate are Safe for Deep Sedation in the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):399-403. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.5.2099.
- Miner JR, Martel ML, Meyer M, Reardon R, Biros MH. Procedural sedation of critically ill patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):124-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.054.
- Mandt MJ, Roback MG, Bajaj L, Galinkin JL, Gao D, Wathen JE. Etomidate for short pediatric procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):898-904. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318267c768.
- Terui T, Inomata M. Administration of additional analgesics can decrease the incidence of paradoxical reactions in patients under benzodiazepine-induced sedation during endoscopic transpapillary procedures: prospective randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2013 Jan;25(1):53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
- Honan VJ. Paradoxical reaction to midazolam and control with flumazenil. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994 Jan-Feb;40(1):86-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(94)70020-6. No abstract available.
- Ladas SD, Aabakken L, Rey JF, Nowak A, Zakaria S, Adamonis K, Amrani N, Bergman JJ, Boix Valverde J, Boyacioglu S, Cremers I, Crowe J, Deprez P, Dite P, Eisen M, Eliakim R, Fedorov ED, Galkova Z, Gyokeres T, Heuss LT, Husic-Selimovic A, Khediri F, Kuznetsov K, Marek T, Munoz-Navas M, Napoleon B, Niemela S, Pascu O, Perisic N, Pulanic R, Ricci E, Schreiber F, Svendsen LB, Sweidan W, Sylvan A, Teague R, Tryfonos M, Urbain D, Weber J, Zavoral M; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members. Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members. Digestion. 2006;74(2):69-77. doi: 10.1159/000097466. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
- Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;48(3):392-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109765. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
- Fanti L, Agostoni M, Casati A, Guslandi M, Giollo P, Torri G, Testoni PA. Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01713-4.
- Chen WX, Lin HJ, Zhang WF, Gu Q, Zhong XQ, Yu CH, Li YM, Gu ZY. Sedation and safety of propofol for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 Aug;4(3):437-40.
- Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ponauthai Y, Prempracha N, Kullavanijaya P. Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;17(3):291-7.
- Frade Mera MJ, Guirao Moya A, Esteban Sanchez ME, Rivera Alvarez J, Cruz Ramos AM, Bretones Chorro B, Vinas Sanchez S, Jacue Izquierdo S, Montane Lopez M. [Analysis of 4 sedation rating scales in the critical patient]. Enferm Intensiva. 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):88-94. doi: 10.1016/s1130-2399(09)72588-x. Spanish.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Adenocarcinoma
- Carcinoma
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Biliary Tract Diseases
- Pancreatic Diseases
- Bile Duct Diseases
- Common Bile Duct Diseases
- Cholelithiasis
- Cholangiocarcinoma
- Pancreatitis
- Choledocholithiasis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Midazolam
- Meperidine
- Etomidate
Other Study ID Numbers
- ETOMI-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...CelgeneWithdrawnPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer | Stage I Pancreatic Cancer | Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Cancer | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Malignant Neoplasm | Undifferentiated Pancreatic CarcinomaUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownStage ⅠA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅠB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡB Pancreatic CancerChina
-
University of UtahNovartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingMetastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityNot yet recruitingPancreatic Cancer Stage III | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IB | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IIA | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IIBChina
Clinical Trials on Etomidate
-
T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİCompletedInduction of AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction | Anesthesia Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse Effect | Propofol Adverse Reaction | Etomidate Adverse ReactionUnited States
-
Maharashtra University of Health SciencesCompletedHemodynamics | Side Effects
-
Peking University Third HospitalNot yet recruitingHysteroscopic Surgery | Etomidate Induced Dose
-
Xijing HospitalCompletedElderly Patients | Ambulatory SurgeryChina
-
Sichuan Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdCompleted
-
University of California, DavisCompletedSurgeryUnited States
-
Korea University Anam HospitalRecruitingSedation Complication | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy | Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionKorea, Republic of
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
Ahon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Recruiting