Long-term Treatment Effect of Intravitreal Ant-VEGF in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

January 9, 2014 updated by: Stefan Sacu, Medical University of Vienna

Treatment With Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 5 Years of Clinical Experience

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second leading cause of retinal vascular disease in patients older than 50 years.The prevalence varies from 0.7% to 1.6% in the literature.

Visual recovery depends on ischemic damage of the retina, the occurence of macular edema (ME) and the development of neovascular glaucoma. The occurence of ME is the main reason for visual loss and frustrates visual recovery among patients with both central or branch RVO.

Therapeutic options that have been used and discussed over the years are the treatment with anticoagulants, fibrinolytics, corticosteroids, acetazolamide and isovolemic haemodilution. Furthermore, surgical options like vitrectomy and radial optic neurotomy were used. Panretinal photocoagulation and grid pattern photocoagulation had established as additional tool to induce chorioretinal anastomosis. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and the evidence of these different treatment options could not be verified and remains mostly unknown.

Nowadays, intravitreal anti-VEGF application had become the treatment of choice for ME secondary to RVO. Multi-center studies have already shown the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatment to reduce intraretinal fluid and retinal hemorrhages (BRAVO, CRUISE). Unfortunately, often high numbers of re-treatments become necessary over the years. In our knowledge, there are no reports showing more than 3 years treatment effects of antiangiogenic drugs in patients with BRVO. However, the results of treatment effect longer than 3 years are important, as the mean age < 70 years with an onset of BRVO has been estimated in about 60% of all cases. In addition, most patients with regard to the application of anti-VEGF treatment in real clinical setting, there is only rare experience concerning need of optimum time duration for follow-up at the departments. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes, safety and therapeutic benefit of a flexible dosing regimen of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with ME secondary to BRVO.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This cross-sectional study evaluates a series of patients with ME due to RVO who were available for at least 4 years' follow-up examination. The patients received either intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or bevacizumab (IVB) in a flexible dosing regimen

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria
        • Medical University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Macular edema secondary to Branch retinal vein occlusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aphakia, Glaucoma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lucentis
PRN intravitreal injection of Lucentis
Lucentis intravitreal injection
Active Comparator: Avastin
PRN intravitreal injection of Lucentis
Avastin intravitreal injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual acuity
Time Frame: up to 6 months
measurement of visual acuity outcomes; baseline in comparison to long-term
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
retinal sensitivity
Time Frame: up to 6 months
course of retinal sensitivity within the groups
up to 6 months
central retinal thickness
Time Frame: up to 6 months
course of central retinal thickness
up to 6 months
treatment rate
Time Frame: up to 6 months
treatment rate within the groups
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Sacu, Prof., Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Clinical Trials on Lucentis intravitreal injection

Subscribe