- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02034409
A Pilot Trial to Assess Low-Intensity Ultrasound in Osteoarthritis (PLUS+OA)
October 15, 2021 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
The purpose of this exploratory trial is to investigate whether PLIUS is potentially effective as a disease and symptom modifying intervention in patients with early knee OA.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis, is a prevalent and debilitating disease without therapies that alter disease progress and is currently managed with symptom-modifying therapies that are only modestly effective.
In spite of substantial progress in understanding the pathogenesis of OA, no effective disease modifying interventions have been established.
Degenerative joint cartilage is a central feature of OA, yet joint cartilage has a limited capacity for repair.
Results from animal research demonstrate that pulsed low intensity ultrasound (PLIUS) mechanically stimulates, and may promote, cartilage repair.
This exploratory trial will investigate whether PLIUS is potentially effective as a disease and symptom modifying intervention in patients with early knee OA.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
140
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92161
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216
- VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
- VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 40 years of age or older, and a US Military Veteran
- Clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis for at least 6 months
- Pain in the index knee on motion or weight bearing for the majority of days during the month before screening
- Clinical diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the knee based on clinical and radiographic criteria
- American Rheumatism Association Functional Class I, II, or III
- Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use a reliable form of medically acceptable contraception
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concurrent medical/arthritis condition(s), or any other illness per the opinion of the investigator, that could interfere with the evaluation of pain or efficacy
- Spine or hip pain of significant magnitude
- History of significant ligament or meniscal injury of the index joint requiring surgical repair
- Arthroscopy of the index knee within 6 months of study entry
- Unable to undergo MRI of the knee
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Corticosteroid treatment within 1 to 3 months prior to study entry
- Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid or congeners to the index knee within 6 months of study entry
- Use of excluded therapy(ies) prior to study entry
- Use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic medications and chronic tetracycline or its derivatives
- Exposure to glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, or any other investigational treatment, within 1 month of study entry
- Use of any medical therapy, complementary or alternative regimens for the treatment of osteoarthritis within 7 days prior to study entry
- Initiation of physical therapy or muscle conditioning program to the lower extremities within 2 months within 2 months prior to study entry
- Unlikely to comply with study requirements
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Sham Comparator: Sham
Treatment to index knee with sham device for 48 weeks
|
20 minutes daily for 48 weeks
|
Experimental: PLIUS
Treatment to index knee with PLIUS device for 48 weeks
|
20 minutes daily for 48 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Co-Primary Measure: a) Symptom Reduction: OMERACT-OARSI Treatment Responsiveness
Time Frame: 48 weeks
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials- Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response incorporates changes in pain and global assessment to define response in OA clinical trials.
A response is classified as: 1) An improvement in either pain or function of at least 50 percent accompanied by an absolute decrease of at least 20 mm on the visual-analogue scale for pain or function, OR 2) The occurrence of at least two of the following: a) a decrease in pain of at least 20 percent accompanied by a decrease of at least 10 mm on the visual-analogue scale; b) an improvement in function of at least 20 percent and a decrease of at least 10 mm on the visual-analogue scale; c) an increase in the patient's global assessment score by at least 20 percent accompanied by a decrease of at least 10 mm on the visual-analogue scale
|
48 weeks
|
Co-Primary Measure: b) Disease Modification as Measured by Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Central Medial Femoral Condyle Disease
Time Frame: Baseline, 48 weeks
|
The study has been designed to determine if PLIUS potentially diminishes articular cartilage thinning by measuring cartilage thickness in the tibial femoral joint.
The measure selected to best evaluate this is cartilage thickness of the central medial femoral condyle because studies of the OAI (Osteoarthritis Initiative) data have shown this region to be among those most sensitive to change and, due to the anatomical positioning of the device, the most likely to be affected by treatment.
|
Baseline, 48 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
The WOMAC® Index questionnaire is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, self-administered, health status measure.
It probes clinically important, patient-relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee.
The WOMAC has been linguistically validated and is a reliable and responsive measure of outcome, and has been used in diverse clinical and interventional environments.
Range is from 0 - 200.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
The WOMAC® Index questionnaire [33] is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, self-administered, health status measure.
It probes clinically important, patient-relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee.
The WOMAC has been linguistically validated and is a reliable and responsive measure of outcome, and has been used in diverse clinical and interventional environments.
WOMAC pain scores from 0-500 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Functional Limits Subscale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
The WOMAC® Index questionnaire [33] is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, self-administered, health status measure.
It probes clinically important, patient-relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee.
The WOMAC has been linguistically validated and is a reliable and responsive measure of outcome, and has been used in diverse clinical and interventional environments.
Range is from 0 - 1700.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
The WOMAC® Index questionnaire is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, self-administered, health status measure.
It probes clinically important, patient-relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee.
The WOMAC has been linguistically validated and is a reliable and responsive measure of outcome, and has been used in diverse clinical and interventional environments.
Range is from 0 - 2400.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
A patient global assessment of disease status on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be measured at each clinic visit.
Patients will be asked to quantify their disease status on a 100 mm VAS as follows: "Considering all the ways your arthritis of the knee affects you, mark 'X' on the scale for how well you are doing."
The scale shows the left hand marker "Very Well", and the right hand marker "Very Poor."
Range 0 to 100 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
An investigator global assessment of disease status on a 100 mm VAS was measured at each clinic visit as follows: "Make a global assessment of the patient's disease status, with regard to the index knee, by marking an 'X' on the scale below.",
with left hand marker "Very Well" and right hand marker "Very Poor."
Range 0 to 100 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Constant Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
This 11-item tool is designed to assess pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis taking into account both constant and intermittent pain experiences.
This tool is designed to be interviewer-administered.
Study participants are asked to respond to the questionnaire items based on index knee in the past week (i.e., past 7-day period).
Study participants responded to all questions for the same joint.
This tool is intended to be responsive to change in OA pain over time or with treatment.
Range 0 to 100 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Intermittent Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
This 11-item tool is designed to assess pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis taking into account both constant and intermittent pain experiences.
This tool is designed to be interviewer-administered and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
Study participants will be asked to respond to the questionnaire items based on index knee in the past week (i.e., past 7-day period).
Study participants will respond to all questions for the same joint.
This tool is intended to be responsive to change in OA pain over time or with treatment.
Range 0 to 100 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Change From Baseline in Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Total Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
This 11-item tool is designed to assess pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis taking into account both constant and intermittent pain experiences.
This tool is designed to be interviewer-administered and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
Study participants will be asked to respond to the questionnaire items based on index knee in the past week (i.e., past 7-day period).
Study participants will respond to all questions for the same joint.
This tool is intended to be responsive to change in OA pain over time or with treatment.
Range 0 to 100 mm.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.
|
Baseline, week 24, week 48
|
Number of Participants Discontinuing the Study Device Due to an Adverse Device Event
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48-week visits
|
Difference between study groups in number of participants who discontinued usage of the study device due to adverse device events at 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48-week visits.
|
Baseline, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48-week visits
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel O Clegg, MD, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 22, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 9, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
January 13, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 18, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 15, 2021
Last Verified
October 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CLIN-006-13S
- CXI01CX000954-01A1 (Other Identifier: eRA project Reference)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Degenerative
-
Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalHaukeland University Hospital; Martina Hansen's HospitalRecruitingDegenerative Joint Disease of Knee | Osteoarthritis; PrimaryNorway
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingOpen Fractures, Degenerative Osteoarthritis and Degenerative Spinal Diseases
-
University Hospital, BordeauxBiom'Up France SASCompletedDegenerative Osteoarthritis | Degenerative Lumbar VertebraFrance
-
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AGIqvia Pty Ltd; eResearchTechnology, Inc; M Squared Associates,Inc.; ExecuPharm...CompletedDegenerative Joint Disease of HipBelgium, Finland, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Kolon TissueGene, Inc.Not yet recruitingDegenerative Osteoarthritis
-
Kayseri City HospitalCompletedOsteoarthritis of Knee | Degenerative OsteoarthritisTurkey
-
R-BioCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Degenerative ArthritisKorea, Republic of
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsUniversity of PittsburghCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Osteoarthritis, Hip | Arthritis, DegenerativeUnited States
-
R-BioCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Degenerative ArthritisKorea, Republic of
-
Colorado Joint ReplacementRecruitingDegenerative OsteoarthritisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Sham Comparator
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingTreatment Resistant Depression | Bipolar II Disorder, Most Recent Episode Major Depressive | Current Depressive EpisodeUnited States
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityHighland Instruments, Inc.Recruiting
-
Ward Photonics LLCCompletedFat ReductionUnited States
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalHighland Instruments, Inc.RecruitingParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, IncCompletedGeographic AtrophyUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedDiabetic Macular Edema | Macular Edema | Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration | Retinal Vein OcclusionsPuerto Rico, United States
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...RecruitingFunctional Movement DisorderUnited States
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityWithdrawnDiabetic Kidney DiseaseChina
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderFrance