Zoledronic Acid Administration in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

March 12, 2018 updated by: William A. Bauman, M.D., James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

The Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid in the Prevention of Bone Loss in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

In subjects with acute SCI: To compare the effects of parenteral zoledronic acid therapy on preservation of regional and total skeletal mass (DXA).

Hypothesis: Zoledronic acid will dramatically diminish bone loss in persons with acute SCI, as evidenced by serial densitometry determinations (DXA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Immobilization is associated with disuse osteoporosis. Spinal cord injury (SCI) produces a syndrome of acute skeletal immobilization with immediate and irreversible unloading of the involved skeletal regions resulting in accelerated bone loss. In addition to rapid bone loss, there are also the complications of hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, nephrolithiasis, and renal insufficiency. In some reports, as much as 50% of regional bone mass has been lost within the first year after paralysis. A depletion of regional bone of such magnitude greatly increases the risk of fractures, with associated morbidity and increased cost of care. Often, these fractures occur with minimal or non-obvious trauma and may pass undiagnosed for varying lengths of time due to the absence of pain sensation. The acute complications of fracture may include hemorrhage, deep venous thrombosis, and autonomic dysreflexia. Long-term complications include functional deformity, non-union, infection, heterotopic calcification, and significantly longer healing time. The sociology-economic consequences include a minimum of 1 to 2 weeks of hospitalization and the potential need for an increased level of attendant care. This study will address the efficacy of a bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (Reclast: 5 mg; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., East Hanover, NJ), in the prevention of the bone loss associated with acute SCI.

Prevention of regional osteoporosis in persons with SCI would reduce the morbidity associated with fractures, a known secondary complication of immobilization. Thus, the quality of life would be improved in terms of employment responsibilities (reduction in days absent from employment and income lost) and personal activities (recreational endeavors, independence, and ease in which one performs activities of daily living). Individuals with SCI may then engage more securely in activities without fear of fracture, a tremendous psychological benefit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
        • Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 49 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Within 3 months of the date of acute SCI.
  2. Motor-complete and incomplete SCI [American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) of sensorimotor impairment (AIS A, B, and C)]

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Extensive life-threatening injuries (in addition to SCI)
  2. Femur or tibia fracture or extensive bone trauma
  3. History of prior bone disease (Paget's disease, overactive parathyroid, osteoporosis)
  4. Post-menopausal women
  5. Known allergy to bisphosphonates
  6. Severe underlying chronic illness
  7. Current diagnosis of cancer or history of cancer
  8. I am currently receiving corticosteroids
  9. Pregnancy or lactation
  10. I have been diagnosed with kidney problems
  11. As determined from the prescreening blood tests by the study physician Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl
  12. As determined from the prescreening blood tests by the study physician Corrected calcium < 8 mg/dl or > 11 mg/dl
  13. As determined from the prescreening blood tests by the study physician Elevated liver function enzymes > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  14. I am taking a bisphosphonate for heterotopic ossification (HO) (an overgrowth of bone typically diagnosed shortly after SCI in the pelvic region)
  15. I have an existing dental condition or dental infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Zoledronic acid
At baseline, study subjects in the treatment group will receive 5 mg of zoledronic acid (Reclast: 5 mg; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., East Hanover, NJ) by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes.
At baseline, study subjects in the treatment group will receive 5 mg of zoledronic acid (Reclast: 5 mg; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., East Hanover, NJ) by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Reclast
  • Zometa
NO_INTERVENTION: No Intervention
Participants will receive no therapy and serve as a control group and have the same outcome measures completed at parallel time points.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia at Baseline and Month 12.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
An imaging method known as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to obtain BMD of the distal femur and proximal tibia by using a customized research software program supplied by the manufacturer. This measurement will be the primary determinant (dependent measure) of difference among the treatment and control groups, and they will be followed over time at the previously specified time points.
Baseline and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Total Hip at Baseline and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
An imaging method known as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to obtain BMD of the total hip.
Baseline and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disuse Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Zoledronic acid

Subscribe