- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02044991
Ultrasound Guided Posterior Sacroiliac Ligament Corticosteroid Injection in Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain
July 11, 2018 updated by: Colleen Fitzgerald, Loyola University
The Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Posterior Sacroiliac Ligament Corticosteroid Injection in Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to see if pelvic girdle pain can be more effectively treated with the use of injectable anti-inflammatory medication plus physical therapy compared with physical therapy and a saline injection.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) in pregnancy is common with prevalence estimates of 45%.1 It is defined as pain experienced between the posterior iliac crest and the gluteal fold, particularly in the region of the sacroiliac joint.2
Pain may radiate in the posterior thigh and can also occur in conjunction with/or separately in the symphysis.
In PGP, the endurance capacity for standing, walking and sitting is diminished.
The diagnosis of PGP can be reached after exclusion of lumbar causes and must be reproducible by specific clinical tests.
While various pain mechanisms including mechanical, hormonal, inflammatory, and neural have been proposed in the development of PGP, the etiology and pathogenesis is poorly understood.
It is possible that musculoskeletal changes influenced by hormonal (Relaxin) elevation in pregnancy predispose pregnant women to acute musculoskeletal injury presenting clinically as PGP.
An inflammatory response in other acute musculoskeletal injuries has been well described3 and may also occur in pregnancy related PGP particularly given the musculoskeletal vulnerability during this time.
Though PGP is common in pregnancy, no study to date has investigated the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment in pregnancy related PGP in order to better establish the contribution of inflammation in the etiology of pregnancy related PGP.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
2
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
- Loyola University Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women who are not doing other therapies for pain (physical therapy, chiropractic management, pool)
- Women between age 21 and 50 who plan to deliver at Loyola or Gottlieb
- Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on average of greater than or equal to 5/10 at Visit 1
- Pain must be between the upper level of the iliac crests and the gluteal folds in conjunction with or separately from pain in the pubic symphysis and influenced by position and locomotion
- 2/4 positive physical examination tests on the symptomatic side including the P4 test, the LDL test, pubic symphysis palpation and the acute straight leg rise (ASLR)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women presenting with PGP in the first or third trimester (<13 weeks gestation or >28 weeks gestation)
- Women with pubic symphysis (anterior) pain alone
- Women who do not plan to deliver a baby at Loyola or Gottlieb
- Pain above the upper level of the iliac crest
- History of lumbar or pelvic fracture, neoplasm, inflammatory disease, active urogenital infection or active gastrointestinal illness, current physical therapy or other therapies for PGP, or previous surgery of the lumbar spine, pelvic girdle, hip joint or femur
- History or signs of radiculopathy or other systemic neurologic disease
- Women with diabetes or gestational diabetes
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment
Participants randomized to this arm will receive a corticosteroid.
This is 40mg of a non-fluorinated injectable glucocorticoid, methylprednisolone acetate (1cc) combined with 1cc of 1% Lidocaine
|
40mg of a non-fluorinated injectable glucocorticoid, methylprednisolone acetate (1cc) combined with 1cc of 1% Lidocaine
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participant's randomized to this condition will receive a placebo injection once weekly
|
A placebo injection
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Pain is measured using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), which ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating greater pain.
This measure is recorded at baseline (0 weeks) and 8 weeks.
The change in pain between these two time points (i.e., the difference score) is compared between the two groups.
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pelvic Functioning
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Pelvic functioning is measured at baseline (0 weeks) and week 8 using the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), which ranges from 0 to 100 points with higher scores revealing greater pelvic girdle pain.
The change in pelvic functioning between these two time points (i.e., the difference score) is compared between the two groups.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Disability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Disability is measured at baseline (0 weeks) and week 8 using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a measure of low back pain that ranges from 0 points to 100 with higher scores indicating greater disability.
The change in disability between these two time points (i.e., the difference score) is compared between the two groups.
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Colleen Fitzgerald, MD, Loyola Univ Med Cntr-
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, Mens JM, van Dieen JH, Wuisman PI, Ostgaard HC. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004 Nov;13(7):575-89. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0615-y. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
- Ekman EF, Koman LA. Acute pain following musculoskeletal injuries and orthopaedic surgery: mechanisms and management. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:21-33.
- Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B. Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70052-2.
- Stapleton DB, MacLennan AH, Kristiansson P. The prevalence of recalled low back pain during and after pregnancy: a South Australian population survey. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;42(5):482-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00482.x.
- Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1430-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a673.
- Brynhildsen J, Hansson A, Persson A, Hammar M. Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00630-3.
- Stuge B, Hilde G, Vollestad N. Physical therapy for pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Nov;82(11):983-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00125.x.
- Stuge B, Laerum E, Kirkesola G, Vollestad N. The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):351-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000090827.16926.1d.
- Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Jun;80(6):505-10.
- Stuge B, Veierod MB, Laerum E, Vollestad N. The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 May 15;29(10):E197-203. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200405150-00021.
- Elden H, Fagevik-Olsen M, Ostgaard HC, Stener-Victorin E, Hagberg H. Acupuncture as an adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: randomised double-blinded controlled trial comparing acupuncture with non-penetrating sham acupuncture. BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1655-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01904.x. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
- Haugland KS, Rasmussen S, Daltveit AK. Group intervention for women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(11):1320-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340600780458.
- Bastiaenen CH, de Bie RA, Wolters PM, Vlaeyen JW, Leffers P, Stelma F, Bastiaanssen JM, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. Effectiveness of a tailor-made intervention for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN08477490]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 27;7:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-19.
- Lin J, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Weadock WJ, Hayes CW. An illustrated tutorial of musculoskeletal sonography: part I, introduction and general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):637-45. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750637. No abstract available.
- Le Goff B, Berthelot JM, Maugars Y. Ultrasound assessment of the posterior sacroiliac ligaments. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):1014-7. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
- Pekkafahli MZ, Kiralp MZ, Basekim CC, Silit E, Mutlu H, Ozturk E, Kizilkaya E, Dursun H. Sacroiliac joint injections performed with sonographic guidance. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Jun;22(6):553-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.6.553.
- Schull WJ, Otake M. Cognitive function and prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation. Teratology. 1999 Apr;59(4):222-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199904)59:43.0.CO;2-M.
- Ruiz-Irastorza G, Khamashta MA. Managing lupus patients during pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;23(4):575-82. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.04.004.
- Baer AN, Witter FR, Petri M. Lupus and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 Oct;66(10):639-53. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318239e1ee.
- Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2.
- Ostensen M, Ramsey-Goldman R. Treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disorders in pregnancy: what are the safest treatment options? Drug Saf. 1998 Nov;19(5):389-410. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199819050-00006.
- Cole BJ, Schumacher HR Jr. Injectable corticosteroids in modern practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):37-46. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00006.
- Kumar N, Newman RJ. Complications of intra- and peri-articular steroid injections. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):465-6.
- Slotkoff AT, Katz P. Approach to the patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Intern Med. 1994;39:197-240.
- Plastaras CT, Joshi AB, Garvan C, Chimes GP, Smeal W, Rittenberg J, Lento P, Stanos S, Fitzgerald C. Adverse events associated with fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac joint injections. PM R. 2012 Jul;4(7):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
- Jacobs JW, Michels-van Amelsfort JM. How to perform local soft-tissue glucocorticoid injections? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;27(2):171-94. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.03.003.
- Elimian A, Goodman JR, Knudtson E, Wagner A, Wilson P, Williams M. Local anesthesia and pain perception during amniocentesis: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Dec;33(12):1158-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.4214. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
- Edelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Astley S, Shy K, Jensen JT. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127981.53911.0e.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 24, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 22, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
February 22, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
January 24, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 8, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 11, 2018
Last Verified
July 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 205418
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
IPD Plan Description
There is no plan to share individual participant data
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Girdle Pain
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle PainPakistan
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityNot yet recruitingPostpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain
-
Helse Stavanger HFUniversity of StavangerCompletedPelvic Girdle Pain Post Partum | Low Back Pain Post PartumNorway
-
Muş Alparlan UniversityCompletedPregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle PainTurkey
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudLa Tour HospitalNot yet recruitingPregnancy | Pelvic Girdle Pain | Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPelvic Girdle PainPakistan
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedPelvic Girdle PainUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalCompleted
-
University of CalgaryCompletedPelvic Girdle Pain
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchNational Taiwan University Hospital; National Taiwan UniversityRecruitingPelvic Girdle PainTaiwan
Clinical Trials on Corticosteroid
-
Lebanese UniversityCompletedCOVID-19 Pandemic | MoralityLebanon
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Randa Abdelbadie AbdelaleemUnknown
-
National Eye Institute (NEI)CompletedMacular Degeneration | Choroidal NeovascularizationUnited States
-
Rafael StelmachFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompleted
-
The Philadelphia & South Jersey Hand CenterUnknownTrigger Finger | Stenosing TenosynovitisUnited States
-
Central London Community Healthcare NHS TrustUniversity of HertfordshireNot yet recruitingAdhesive Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeRecruiting
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...CompletedCarpal Tunnel SyndromeTurkey