Long-term Safety Follow-up Study of Patients Having Received HepaStem (SAF001)

May 23, 2019 updated by: Promethera Therapeutics

Long-term Safety Follow-up Study of Patients Having Received Infusions of HepaStem

The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety follow-up of patients having been treated with HepaStem.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the SAF001 study is the long-term safety surveillance of the patients post infusion with HepaStem. Furthermore, the evolution of both the metabolic condition and the quality of life are followed. As much as possible, the surveillance will mimic the standard follow-up of the respective diseases (standard of care). The surveillance will end when the patient is undergoing an organ transplant or takes part in another research study. This surveillance will last up to a maximum of 48 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium, 1435
        • Promethera Biosciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 23 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The SAF001 study will include all patients having received infusions of HepaStem in any former interventional study conducted by Promethera Biosciences.

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

- Subject having received HepaStem during a former interventional clinical study and who have terminated their participation in that study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subject has received mature liver cells, stem cells transplantation other than HepaStem, or organ liver transplant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Inborn errors of liver metabolism

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterisation of the long term safety profile of HepaStem therapy.
Time Frame: 4 years

Assessment of safety will be achieved by evaluating the following parameters

  • Physical examination
  • Vital signs
  • Laboratory tests
  • Liver tumor markers
  • Autoimmune markers related to liver pathology
  • Anti-HLA antibodies specific for donor cell haplotypes
  • Morphology of liver, bile ducts, and portal system by ultrasound
  • Morphology of the kidneys by ultrasound
  • Non-serious or serious Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) related to HepaStem therapy.
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To characterize the disease evolution after having received HepaStem therapy and to report on general safety.
Time Frame: 4 years

This assessment is based on the evaluation of:

  • Report on cognitive skills, behaviour, and health-related quality of life indicators
  • Non-serious or serious Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) related to concomitant medications or other causes

Indication I: Crigler-Najjar syndrome

  • Frequency and severity of metabolic decompensation
  • Metabolic parameters (serum total bilirubin)
  • Report on supportive treatment and any adjustment of phototherapy and medication (eg phenobarbital treatment)

Indication II: Urea cycle disorders

  • Frequency and severity of metabolic decompensation
  • Metabolic parameters (NH3 values, amino acids in plasma)
  • Report on supportive treatment and any adjustment of:

    • diet (natural protein intake, total protein intake, amino acid supplements)
    • Medication (eg nitrogen scavengers)
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Françoise Smets, MD, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (Belgium)
  • Principal Investigator: Dries Dobbelaere, MD/Prof, CHRU de Lille - Hopital Jeanne de Flandre (France)
  • Principal Investigator: Isabel Gonçalves, MD/Prof, Hospital Pediátrico de Coimbra (Portugal)
  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie Grunewald, MD, Great Ormond Street Children Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Giuliano Torre, MD, IRCCS OSPEDALE PEDIATRICO DEL BAMBINO GESÃ (Roma)
  • Principal Investigator: Hanna Mandel, MD, Rambam Health Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urea Cycle Disorders

Subscribe