Detection of SLN in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Assisted Staging: Comparison of ISB and ICG

August 20, 2019 updated by: AdventHealth

Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Staging: Comparison of Isosulfan Blue (ISB) and Indocyanine Green Dyes (ICG) With Fluorescence Imaging

The investigators hypothesis is that if sensitivity and specificity are found to be significantly higher than the current reports with Technesium-99 and ISB colorimetric dye, SLN biopsies might allow omission of full lymphadenectomy in lower-risk cases, thereby limiting peri-operative morbidity. SLN biopsies might also improve the detection of metastatic disease, essentially lowering the recognized false-negative rate of standard lymphadenectomy analyzed by routine H&E pathologic analysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study objective is to compare two sentinel lymph node detection technologies [fluorescence imaging and Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye verses standard laparoscopic colorimetric analysis using Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye] for sensitivity and specificity of detecting metastatic disease in pelvic lymph nodes of women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. The following three specific aims would be addressed in this research proposal:

Specific Aim 1: To determine the ability of mapping bilaterally pelvic SLN in women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic staging comparing two different methods (i.e., comparing the combination of colorimetric analysis-ISB dye + fluorescence imaging-ICG dye vs. colorimetric analysis-ISB dye alone).

Specific Aim 2: To estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of pelvic SLN in endometrial cancer with respect to predicting nodal metastasis.

Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the ability of sentinel lymph nodes to increase the detection of metastatic disease through ultra-sectioning and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining by comparing IHC results and standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
        • Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient must be ≥18 and ≤85 years of age.
  2. The patient must be female.
  3. The patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent.
  4. The patient is willing and able to comply with the study protocol.
  5. The patient has endometrial cancer and is scheduled for robotic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
  6. The patient agrees to follow-up examinations out to 6-weeks post-treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient is not a candidate for robotic assisted hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
  2. The patient has known or suspected allergies to iodine, ICG or ISB.
  3. The patient has hepatic dysfunction confirmed by elevated liver function studies (i.e., hepatic enzyme SGOT, SGPT or Bilirubin > 2 x normal (based on reference values from the laboratory used by the patient)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ISB dye, standard white light
SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging.
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.
Other Names:
  • Isosulfan Blue dye
Experimental: ICG dye, FireFly fluorescence imaging
SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging.
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.
Other Names:
  • Isosulfan Blue dye
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging.
Other Names:
  • Indocyanine green dye

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes.
Time Frame: through 6 weeks post-operative
through 6 weeks post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.
Time Frame: through 6 weeks post-operative

The standard definition for negative predictive value was used to calculate NPV. There was one false negative SLN in this study, 39 true positive sentinel lymph nodes, and 140 negative pelvic metastatic patients.

NPV = 140/141=99.3%

through 6 weeks post-operative

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).
Time Frame: through 6 weeks post-operative
Of the 127 positive nodes with pathology information, the percentage of each type of node will be summarized by the staining method. Statistical testing of the individual staining methods compared to both will be computed using Chi-square test of independence.
through 6 weeks post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Holloway, MD, Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer

Clinical Trials on ISB dye and standard white light imaging

3
Subscribe