Return of Function and External Rotation Post Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation With Neutral Rotation Brace (ROTATE)

Research question:

Do patients using a neutral rotation brace post surgery have improved functional outcome and external rotation of the shoulder compared to current best practice using a polysling holding the proximal humerus in internal rotation?

Primary objectives:

To compare post-operative functional outcome scores obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. (Scores at 6 weeks and 3 months in clinical review and postal scores at 9 weeks and 1 year) between patients held in neutral versus current standard rotation. These will be compared to scores taken pre-operatively.

Benefits:

There may be no extra benefits to patients from this trial however the results from the trial will help improve treatment for future patients at this hospital, and others across the country.

Risks/disadvantages:

The operation is the same in both groups studied, the study is investigating the use of the two different slings. The post-operative treatment is also the same, and all patients on the trial will receive the same amount of physiotherapy. It isn't anticipated that there will be any additional risk from this trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Torquay, United Kingdom, TQ2 7AA
        • Torbay District General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proximal humeral fractures requiring operative intervention with extramedullary plate fixation (i.e. fractures displaced by 1cm and/or angulated by 45 degrees or more)
  • Age over 18 years of age
  • Patient able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having intra-operative findings to complete Pectoralis major rupture or if operative exposure requires complete Pectoralis major tenotomy. (These patients need to be held in internal rotation with a standard polysling to allow healing of the Pectoralis major tendon)
  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Neutral Rotation Brace
Operative fixation by the shoulder team at Torbay Hospital
Performed at the end of the surgical procedure at Torbay Hospital
Physiotherapy review on day of surgery, and post-surgery at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year.
Other Names:
  • Oxford
  • DASH
  • SF-12
Sent to patient at 9 weeks post surgery
Performed at 6 weeks and 3 months at shoulder clinic appointment at Torbay Hospital
OTHER: Standard polysling (Current practice)
Operative fixation by the shoulder team at Torbay Hospital
Performed at the end of the surgical procedure at Torbay Hospital
Physiotherapy review on day of surgery, and post-surgery at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year.
Other Names:
  • Oxford
  • DASH
  • SF-12
Sent to patient at 9 weeks post surgery
Performed at 6 weeks and 3 months at shoulder clinic appointment at Torbay Hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxford score
Time Frame: 1 Year post surgery
Patients subjective assessment of pain and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) impairment. The Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire has been shown to correlate well with both the Constant Score and the SF36 assessment and to be sensitive to surgical intervention. The Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire accumulates to a total score with a maximum of value of 60, in which four pain related questions make up 33% of this total whilst the remaining 67% is derived from eight ADL related questions. The highest scores are attributed to the worst outcomes in the Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire
1 Year post surgery
DASH - the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand
Time Frame: 1 year post surgery
DASH Scoring system was developed to assess the level of disability for any patient with any condition affecting the upper limb by covering domains including symptoms, physical function and psychological function
1 year post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of movement(flexion, extension, abduction, external and internal rotation)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year
Assessed by Physiotherapists. Measurement will be performed using a goniometer to accurately assess range of movement
6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year
SF-12 Score
Time Frame: 1 Year post surgery
This survey form has been shown to yield summary physical and mental health outcome scores
1 Year post surgery
Range of movement (flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year
Conducted by physiotherapists. Measured using a goniometer to accurately assess range of movement
6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year
Time to union of fracture
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 Months
X-Rays taken
6 weeks and 3 Months
Return to work post surgery
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
1 year follow up
Re-operations and Complications
Time Frame: Throughout 1st year as applicable at outpatient appointments
Documented at various outpatient appointments
Throughout 1st year as applicable at outpatient appointments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Veronica Conboy, FRCS (Orth), South Devon Healthcare

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Humeral Fracture

Clinical Trials on Operative procedure to fix proximal humeral

3
Subscribe