Follow up After Intensive Care. The FUTstudy (FUT)

January 4, 2019 updated by: Kirsti Tøien, Oslo University Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Nurse Led Follow up After Being a Patient in the Intensive Care Unit.

To investigate the effect of nurse led follow up talks to prevent posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms and improve quality of life and sence of coherence after an intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

Secondly:

Investigate level of psychological distress, quality of life, hope and work participation in ICU patients after an ICU stay and factors associated with these outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ICU patient experiences total dependence on health care professionals and technical devices. Some patients report unpleasant memories such as pain, feeling helpless, or delusional experiences from the ICU stay and many report physical or mental symptoms after discharge from the ICU. Return to work rate after ICU treatment differs. Most ICU patients receive analgesics and sedatives to relieve pain and discomfort during the stay. Thus many patients have few memories from their time being critically ill. For patients with few memories from the ICU stay this represents an interruption in the patient's life history. Since personal identity is influenced by the stories we tell about ourselves, loss of memory from a period with critical illness might be experienced as a threat towards self-confidence and sense of coherence. Some patients with traumatic memories from the ICU develop PTS symptoms after discharge.

In order to help the earlier ICU patient to achieve a life with less physical and mental complaints, some ICUs have established a follow up program in outpatient clinics after discharge from hospital, but there is sparse evidence of the effectiveness of this intervention, and what type of follow up that best help the patients.

The primary aim of the study is to:

Investigate if a group of previous intensive care patients receiving nurse led follow up talks three times after discharge from the ICU have less post traumatic stress symptoms, pain, increased sense of coherence and, work participation and health related quality of life (HRQL) three, six and twelve months after discharge from the ICU compared to a control group receiving standard care.

Secondary aim:

Investigate level and predictors of anxiety, depression, PTS symptoms, hope, pain, HRQOL and work participation in intensive care patients ICU patients first year after discharge from ICU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

224

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Oslo University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with an ICU stay like or above 24 hours who speak and understand Norwegian and who are conscious and cognitively oriented at the time of inclusion. Patients with a score of 25 or more on Post Traumatic Stress Scale 10 (PTSS-10) is randomized to intervention or control group. Patients with a score below 25 on PTSS-10 is included in an observation group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe psychiatric disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Follow up talks
Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.
Nurse led follow up talks at the ward and one and two months later.
No Intervention: No talks
Patients with a score like or above 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual
No Intervention: Observation group
Patients with a score below 25 on Post traumatic stress scale-10 Intensive Care Screen after discharge from the ICU. Care as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post traumatic stress symptoms
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Baseline is measured when the patient has been discharged from the ICU to a ward. Change from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sense of coherence (Sense of coherence scale 13)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Baseline is measured when the patient has been discharged from the ICU to a ward. Change from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Baseline is measured when the patient has been discharged from the ICU to a ward. Change from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Pain (Brief pain inventory)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Baseline is measured when the patient has been discharged from the ICU to a ward before leaving the hospital. Change from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Work participation
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline
Baseline is measured when the patient has been discharged from the ICU to a ward. Change from baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Follow up talks

3
Subscribe