Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Thermal Injury During TLH

April 28, 2016 updated by: Duke University

Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Thermal Injury at the Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Review of the Duke Experience and Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose of this randomized control study is to determine if the mode of electrothermal colpotomy incision affects (1) the degree of thermal injury at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy or (2) the incidence of clinical surrogates of compromised vaginal cuff healing. Women already scheduled for TLH will be randomized to colpotomy incision with the V mode or standard cut/coag form of electrothermal energy.

Prevalence of vaginal cuff injury will be calculated, and cross tabulation tables will be used to examine the association fo dehiscence with proposed risk factors in the retrospective part of the study. In the randomized controlled trial, depth of thermal injury will be compared between the two groups, and a chi-square test will be used to test for a difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. There is little risk associated with this study above the normal surgical risks; however, the V mode has not been previously been studied for its use in making a colpotomy incision. Loss of confidentiality is a risk of the study, but all samples will be de-identified and given a unique study number, and only individuals directly involved in the study will be given access to the study information.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Patient scheduled for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
  3. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Known pelvic infection within 30 days prior to hysterectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cut/Coag
Incision using electrothermal cautery, with an attempt made to use the "cut" (continuous low-voltage, high-current) for colpotomy incision following the initial scoring of the cervico-vaginal tissue on the "coag" (pulsed high-voltage, low-current) mode.
Other Names:
  • Valleylab G3000 Electrosurgical Device
Use of surgical device Valleylab G3000 Electrosurgical Device
Experimental: V-mode
Use of surgical device Valleylab G3000 Electrosurgical Device
Incision using electrothermal cautery in the "V mode". The V mode combines real-time tissue sensing technology with the cut and coag waveforms to reduce the amount of thermal spread to the tissue without sacrificing hemostasis during monopolar electrothermal procedures.
Other Names:
  • Valleylab G3000 Electrosurgical Device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Thermal Injury at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Time Frame: up to 36 months
distance in millimeters over which thermal tissue injury extends (henceforth referred to as "injury").
up to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Clinical Surrogates of Compromised Vaginal Cuff Healing
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after hysterectomy for a post-operative check and pelvic examination
a difference between arms in the proportion of patients who have at least one of the following post-operatively: vaginal vault granulation tissue, vaginal cuff separation/dehiscence, or vaginal apex infection
4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after hysterectomy for a post-operative check and pelvic examination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paula S Lee, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00019452

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thermal Injury

Clinical Trials on Cut-Coag

Subscribe