Esophageal Cytology With FISH in Detecting Esophageal Cancer

May 9, 2017 updated by: John Hunter, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Esophageal Cancer (10030139, 10066354) Screening With FISH in Esophageal Cytology

This clinical trial studies whether esophageal cytology plus fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is equal to or better than esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) or upper endoscopy for the early detection of esophageal cancer. Genes are the units of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) the chemical structure carrying genetic information that determine many human characteristics. Certain genes in cancer cells may determine how the tumor grows or spreads and how it may respond to different drugs. Part of this study is to test those genes in esophageal cells using FISH.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if sponge cytology with FISH is a reliable screening tool for esophageal dysplasia/cancer, and determine its sensitivity and specificity, compared to the gold standard procedure (upper endoscopy).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if the cytology screening with FISH biomarkers is more cost effective than upper endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer and the surveillance of esophageal metaplasia and dysplasia.

II. Determine the limitations and future needs to improve this technique.

OUTLINE:

Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with known esophageal cancer diagnosed by previous endoscopy

    • Adenocarcinoma
    • Squamous cell carcinoma
  • Patients determined to be at risk for esophageal cancer:

    • Subjects with a history of Barrett's esophagus
    • Subjects with a history of low or high grade dysplasia
    • Subjects with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
    • Subjects with a history of esophagitis
    • Subjects with symptoms of esophageal cancer (EC) referred for endoscopy (new onset dysphagia, weight loss, etc)
  • Patients must be scheduled for a procedure capable of providing a definitive pathological diagnosis and evaluating for complications of the esophageal sponge on the same day as the study procedure, either:

    • Upper endoscopy
    • Surgical esophagectomy
  • Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 3 (Karnofsky >= 30%) will be included
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with severe, symptomatic dysphagia (unable to pass solids)
  • Subjects that are unable to swallow a tablet/pill for any reason
  • Subjects with a previous esophagectomy
  • Subjects with esophageal varices
  • Subjects unable to provide consent
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Screening (esophageal cytology, FISH)
Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.
Correlative studies
Undergo esophageal cytology collection
Other Names:
  • Cytologic Sampling
Undergo standard EGD or endoscopy
Other Names:
  • EGD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of Sponge Cytology Using FISH
Time Frame: At the time of sponge cytology and EGD
All processed (FISH) esophageal cells will be compared to the final pathologic esophageal diagnoses determined by EGD or surgical resection to assess the test's sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Using EGD diagnostic outcomes as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity will be computed with corresponding 95% confidence interval of the FISH sponge cytology test in the study population.
At the time of sponge cytology and EGD
Specificity of Sponge Cytology Using FISH
Time Frame: At the time of sponge cytology and EGD
All processed (FISH) esophageal cells will be compared to the final pathologic esophageal diagnoses determined by EGD or surgical resection to assess the test's sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Using EGD diagnostic outcomes as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity will be computed with corresponding 95% confidence interval of the FISH sponge cytology test in the study population.
At the time of sponge cytology and EGD

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events Associated With FISH Sponge Cytology Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time Frame: At the time of sponge cytology procedure
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize all adverse events associated with FISH sponge cytology test.
At the time of sponge cytology procedure
Tolerability of FISH Spongy Cytology
Time Frame: After completion of FISH and EGD
Tolerability is defined as the patient's willingness to repeat procedure.
After completion of FISH and EGD

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Hunter, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophagitis

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Subscribe