Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients

September 6, 2021 updated by: Mukul Talaty, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available Ankle Foot Orthosis in Adult Stroke Patients

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. Participants undergo testing in the gaitlab after using the new brace for a period of time. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 19027
        • MossRehab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between the ages of 21 and 70 males and non-pregnant females
  2. Diagnosis of stroke more than 1 year ago
  3. Ambulatory at 0.5m/s or greater
  4. Require unilateral AFOs to ambulate
  5. Stable medical condition - no concomitant progressive diseases that could affect motor function
  6. Ability to comply with directions and cooperate with research team

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are currently receiving physical therapy for gait problems
  2. Anticipated surgical or pharmacologic intervention for tone/contractures during the study period
  3. Additional neurologic or musculoskeletal diagnoses that might impair gait (i.e., recent orthopedic interventions (6 weeks), unhealed fractures, significant degenerative joint disease, lower limb amputation, uncontrolled seizures)
  4. Recent cardiac or active pulmonary disease, liable blood pressure
  5. Recent back surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional then Experimental brace resistance
Participants received the Default intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the novel intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs
Experimental: Experimental then Conventional brace resistance
Participants received the the novel elastomer to provide brace support intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the conventional intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-selected Walking Velocity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
walking velocity will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat)
8 weeks
Step Length Symmetry
Time Frame: 8 weeks
step length symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step length on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the "normal") side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, meters to meters).
8 weeks
Step Time Symmetry
Time Frame: 8 weeks
step time symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step time on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the "normal") side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, seconds to seconds).
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Joint Kinematics
Time Frame: 8 weeks
joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture system
8 weeks
Joint Kinetics
Time Frame: 8 weeks
joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture and biomechanical force measurement systems
8 weeks
Activity (Step Count)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
activity will be measured using accelerometer based step activity monitoring devices
8 weeks
Subject Opinions
Time Frame: 8 weeks
subject opinions will be measured using surveys and questionnaires
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mukul Talaty, PhD, Albert Einstein (MossRehab)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADR™ brace resistance

Subscribe