Functional Resistance Training to Improve Knee Function After ACL Reconstruction

January 13, 2022 updated by: Riann Palmieri-Smith, University of Michigan

Functional Resistance Training During Gait: A Novel Intervention to Improve Knee Knee Function After ACL Reconstruction

The purpose of this study is to examine if thigh muscle weakness and the lack of muscle activation that accompanies ACL injury and reconstruction can be improved with functional resistance training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Profound quadriceps weakness is ubiquitous after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and current rehabilitation approaches are not successful in optimizing quadriceps strength and knee function even years after the surgery. We hypothesize that suboptimal strength and functional outcomes after ACL surgery are due to the lack of task-specific exercise elements during strength training. This application seeks to assess whether progressive functional resistance training during gait will significantly improve quadriceps function, neural excitability, and knee mechanics during gait. The proposed studies will not only lay the foundation for a novel training paradigm, but will also improve our understanding of the mechanisms mediating neuromuscular and biomechanical changes after functional resistance training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 14-40 years
  • suffered an acute, complete ACL rupture
  • willingness to participate in testing and follow-up as outlined in the protocol
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide written informed consent
  • female subjects who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant
  • previous ACL injury
  • previous surgery to either knee
  • bony fracture accompanying ACL injury
  • patients who experienced a knee dislocation;
  • patients who are contraindicated for transcranial magnetic stimulation (e.g., metal implants in head, unexplained recurrent headaches, history of seizures, epileptogenic drugs, active psychiatric illness, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional Resistance Training with a Brace
Participants will receive functional resistance training via a knee brace while walking on a treadmill 2-3 times a week for about 8 weeks.
A brace will be strapped to the leg and apply resistance across the knee while subjects walk on a treadmill.
Experimental: Functional Resistance Training with Elastic Band
Participants will receive functional resistance training via an elastic band attached at the ankle while walking on a treadmill 2-3 times a week for about 8 weeks.
An elastic band will be strapped to the leg and apply resistance across the knee while subjects walk on a treadmill.
Sham Comparator: Control
Participants will while on a treadmill without an applied resistance 2-3 times a week for about 8 weeks.
A brace will be strapped to the leg and will not apply resistance across the knee while subjects walk on a treadmill.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Pre-test measurements were taken at ~9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction and Post-test measurements were taken at ~18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction.
Isometric quadriceps strength was measured with the knee at 60 degrees using an isokinetic dynamometer prior to the intervention and immediately after the intervention. Post-test minus pre-test change scores were calculated.
Pre-test measurements were taken at ~9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction and Post-test measurements were taken at ~18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps Voluntary Activation
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention or approximately 18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction

Quadriceps voluntary activation was measured using the burst superimposition technique and calculated using the central activation ratio (CAR). The CAR formula is calculated using the peak torque generated immediately prior to the delivery of the stimulus (or the maximum voluntary isometric contraction, MVIC) being divided by the peak torque generated as a result of the electrical stimulus (MVIC plus superimposed burst) and then multiplied by 100. Equation is: MVIC/(MVIC + superimposed burst) × 100. A CAR of 100 represents complete volitional quadriceps activation.

Voluntary activation was quantified immediately after the intervenapproximately 9-10 weeks after the int from baseline to the end of intervention will be assessed and compared between groups.

Immediately after the intervention or approximately 18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction
Knee Flexion Angle Symmetry
Time Frame: Pre-intervention values were recorded at ~9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction and before the start of the intervention. Post-intervention values were recorded after the 8-week intervention (~18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction)
The knee flexion angle (measured in degrees) during the stance phase was gathered for both limbs using three dimension motion capture and recorded while subjects walked overground. A knee flexion angle symmetry score was computed using the following formula: ensemble average of knee flexion angle of ACL limb minus the ensemble average of knee flexion angle of the non-ACL limb. The mean difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention (post minus pre) knee flexion symmetry scores were calculated for each group. Higher values suggest greater increases in knee flexion angle symmetry from pre-intervention to post-intervention.
Pre-intervention values were recorded at ~9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction and before the start of the intervention. Post-intervention values were recorded after the 8-week intervention (~18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction)
Knee Moment Symmetry
Time Frame: Pre-intervention scores were recorded prior to the start of the intervention and approximately 9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction. Post-intervention scores were recorded after the 8 week intervention or approximately 18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction
The sagittal plane knee moment (units Nm) during the stance phase was gathered for both limbs using three dimensional motion capture and recorded while subjects walk overground. A symmetry score was computed using the following formula: ensemble average of the knee moment of the ACL limb (Nm) - ensemble average of the knee moment of the non-ACL limb (Nm). The mean difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention knee moment symmetry scores (post minus pre) were calculated for each group. Higher values represent the greater increases in knee moment symmetry from pre-intervention to post-intervention.
Pre-intervention scores were recorded prior to the start of the intervention and approximately 9-10 weeks after ACL reconstruction. Post-intervention scores were recorded after the 8 week intervention or approximately 18-20 weeks after ACL reconstruction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Riann Palmieri-Smith, PhD, University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Chandramouli Krishnan, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00133860
  • R21HD092614 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Clinical Trials on Functional Resistance Training with Brace

3
Subscribe