IPg2 Study: Left-sided Lung Isolation (IPg2)

October 26, 2017 updated by: Jean Bussières, Laval University

IPg2 Study - Left-sided Lung Isolation: Comparison of Twodevices

Lung isolation is primordial in thoracic surgery. To achieve it, two techniques are used: the double lumen tube (DLT) and the bronchial blocker (BB). Left-sided DLT (L-DLT) is use by the majority of anesthesiologists for both left and right thoracic surgeries. Standard right-sided DLT (Rs-DLT) is rarely use since it is dif¬ficult to properly position it and that there is a risk of misalignment between the lateral orifice of the tube and the origin of the right upper lobe (RUL) bron¬chus. In 2007, the investigators have published results suggesting enlarging the Rs-DLT's lateral orifice. The modified R-DLT (Rm-DLT) was more frequently in an adequate position: 77% vs 37% of patients (p = 0.0121), and easier to reposition: 97% vs 74% of patients (p= 0.0109) in comparison to the standard R-DLT group. The data suggest the superiority of the Rm-DLT compared to Rs-DLT for optimal positioning to facilitate one-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery. It is believed that DLT tend to provide quicker and better quality of lung collapse than BB. In 2013, investigators have demonstrated an equivalent quality of lung collapse (LC) between L-DLT and BB used with two apnea periods when initiating OLV. Complementary analysis showed a significative difference to obtain complete LC (CLC) between L-DLT for left thoracoscopy and L-DLT for right thoracoscopy and BB in right or left surgery. The investigator hypothesis is that, when using L-DLT for left video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), LC of the isolated lung will be slower and of poorer quality compare to the use of the Rm-DLT. The primary objective is to compare the delay between pleural opening (PO) and CLC in left VATS when using three lung isolation devices: 1) L-DLT and 2) Rm-DLT. Secondary objectives are: 1) to evaluate quality of LC, 2) to evaluate the level of obstruction of the lumen of the left bronchus, 3) to evaluate the quality of OLV (PaO2) 4) To collect blind surgeon's opinion about de device used and 5) to measure the delay between OLV and PO for evaluating the role of absorption atelectasis in obtaining CLC. After obtaining IRB approval, the investigators propose a study of 40 patients undergoing an elective left VATS at IUCPQ involving one lung ventilation. They will have to be 21 years or more, to read, understand and sign an informed consent at their pre-operative evaluation. This study will be prospective, randomized, and blind to thoracic surgeons.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Lung isolation is frequently used in thoracic surgery. The quality of the isolation is crucial, especially for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Two techniques are principally used to obtain lung isolation: the double lumen tube (DLT) and the bronchial blocker (BB).

The left-sided DLT (L-DLT) is used by the majority of anesthesiologists, as much for left as for right thoracic surgeries. The standard right-sided DLT (Rs-DLT) is rarely used since positioning its lateral orifice with the origin of the right upper lobe (RUL) can be difficult.(1-4) In 2007, the investigators have published their results suggesting an enlargement of the lateral orifice of the Rs-DLT.(5) They have demonstrated that the modified right-sided double lumen tube (Rm-DLT) remained more frequently in optimal position than the Rs-DLT (77% vs. 37%, p=0.0121) and that it was also easier to reposition the tube after turning the patient in lateral decubitus (97% vs. 74%, p=0.0109).

More recently, investigators have demonstrated, with three dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography of 106 patients, that angulation between the RUL and the horizontal posterior plane varies from -26 to +58°, justifying the modification of the Rs-DLT proposed in 2007. (Unpublished data)

The use of BB for lung isolation is believed to provide a slower and a poorer quality of lung collapse (LC) than DLT. Over the years, the investigators have demonstrated an equivalent quality of lung collapse between the L-DLT and BB when two apnea periods are used at the beginning of one-lung ventilation (OLV). (Unpublished data) Further to complementary analysis, investigators have noted a significant difference in time to get complete lung collapse between left and right thoracic surgery when using the L-DLT. Time to obtain complete lung collapse (CLC) was not different when comparing BB and L-DLT in left thoracic surgery.

The hypothesis to explain these observations is that when the bronchial extremity of the L-DLT is inserted into the left main stem bronchus (LMSB), the LMSB and its relative superior position, associated to a progressive collapse of the left lung, could induce a dynamic obstruction of the distal extremity of the L-DLT lumen, and consequently slowing the lung collapse. Investigators have also regularly observed this type of obstruction during bronchoscopic examination when positioning the L-DLT.

In past studies comparing L-DLT to BB, time to get CLC was measured from the beginning of OLV. Nevertheless, the interval between this time point and the pleural opening (PO) is sometime difficult to control. Technical incidents can prolong this period and induce a bias. Furthermore, in the last investigator's protocol, the second period of apnea is done at pleural opening. For these reasons, the authors consider that the time to get CLC should be measured from the pleural opening since it is the crucial moment for the surgical team. Investigators are proposing to evaluate the PO-CLC interval as a primary objective.(6)

Hypothesis:

The hypothesis of the proposed study is that the use of the L-DLT will allow for a slower and a poorer quality of CLC compared to the ones obtained with the Rm-DLT in left VATS.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing an elective left VATS requiring OLV

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed informed consent
  • elective left video-assisted thoracoscopy
  • one lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated difficult mask ventilation or intubation
  • tracheal or high bronchial origin of the right upper lobe main bronchus
  • severe COPD or asthma
  • pleural disease
  • previous left thoracic surgery
  • chest radiotherapy
  • chimiotherapy
  • significant systemic co-morbidity
  • active or chronic pulmonary infection
  • fibrosis, other interstitial diseases
  • endobronchial mass
  • tracheostomy
  • severe desaturation in the peroperative period
  • any clinical situation precluding the use of an isolation device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Left-sided double-lumen tube
Lung isolation with a left-sided double-lumen tube (BronchoCath, Mallinckrodt Medical, Cornamaddy, Athlone, Westmeath, Ireland)
Modified right-sided double-lumen tube
Right-sided double-lumen tube modified in accordance with Bussières et al. in Can J Anesth 2007

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to obtain complete lung collapse
Time Frame: Peroperative
Time to obtain complete lung collapse will be collected from the pleural opening up to complete lung collapse.
Peroperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of lung collapse
Time Frame: Peroperative
Quality of lung collapse from de beginning of one-lung ventilation to the end of surgery
Peroperative
Degree of obstruction of the right upper lobe bronchus lumen
Time Frame: Peroperative
Degree of obstruction of the right upper lobe bronchus lumen from de beginning of one-lung ventilation to the end of surgery
Peroperative
Quality of one-lung ventilation
Time Frame: Peroperative
Quality of one-lung ventilation from de beginning of one-lung ventilation to the end of surgery
Peroperative
Thoracic surgeon's guess about the device used
Time Frame: Peroperative
Thoracic surgeon must guess which device was used by the anesthesiologist to isolate the lung 20 minutes after pleural opening. Choice: 1= L-DLT or 2= Rm-DLT
Peroperative
Time between the beginning of one-lung ventilation to pleural opening
Time Frame: Peroperative
Time between the beginning of one-lung ventilation to pleural opening from de beginning of one-lung ventilation to the pleural opening
Peroperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

3
Subscribe