- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02141113
Efficacy and Safety Eval of Guanfacine Hydrochloride in Combination With Psychostimulants in Adults (18-65). (ADINT2012)
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single- Center, Dose Optimization Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Guanfacine Hydrochloride in Combination With Psychostimulants in Adults Aged 18-65 Years With a Diagnosis of ADHD
This is considered an investigator-initiated clinical research trial, which means that your study doctor is researching a particular medication (in this case a medication that is currently FDA- approved) for the treatment of AD/HD in individuals ages 6-17. The medication is guanfacine hydrochloride.
The hypothesis is that this medication could be used in adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder who have not received satisfactory results with their current stimulant ADHD medication. The study drug is investigational for use in adults. Investigational means it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adults.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States, 48307
- Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and females (non pregnant) ages 18-65
- Current diagnosis of ADHD and have met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD
- Currently taking an adequate dose stimulant to treat their ADHD (with a sub-optimal response). A suboptimal response is determined by a baseline score of 28 or greater on the ADHD-RS or a CGI score of 4 or greater.
- Subjects must be of normal intelligence
- English speaking
- Able to swallow pills.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non pregnant or lactating females
- Severe Axis I and Axis II disorders
- Suicidal
- Tourette's
- Heart disease or any other serious chronic or acute unstable medical conditions/illnesses that would compromise participation or likely lead to hospitalization during the duration of the study.
- A known history or presence of cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, or hematologic abnormalities, narrow angle glaucoma, or any other unstable medical or psychiatric conditions (as judged by the primary investigator)
- A current or recent history (within the past 6 months) of suspected substance abuse and/or drug dependence as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria
- Healthy weight (not under or over as judged by investigator)
- No immediate family member of the investigator or research staff No involvement in a research study in the last 30 days.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Guanfacine Hydrochloride
|
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Sugar Pill
|
Placebo of matching mg
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ADHD-RS Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The ADHD-RS is an 18-item scale based on DSM-IV criteria for ADHD.
Each item is rated using a likert scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), with a total score range of 0-54, with higher scores indicating more symptoms/severity.
In this study, we compared the mean change in ADHD-RS total score from baseline to endpoint of the study.
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Clinical Global Impression (Severity)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-assessed likert scale used to determine the severity of a patient's presenting symptoms.
The scale evaluates a subject's illness from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (extremely ill).
The results reported below indicate the magnitude of change in terms of mean points on a scale for each study condition (IMP or Placebo).
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
|
The Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician-assessed likert scale measuring change in presenting symptoms from previous visit.
The CGI-I is a 7-item scale with with 1 indicating that the subject has very much improved and 7 indicating that the subject has become very much worse.
|
8 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fatigue Symptoms Inventory (FSI) Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The FSI is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency, and daily pattern of fatigue as well as its perceived interference with quality of life.
Severity is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=not at all fatigued; 10=as fatigued as I could be) that assess most, least, and average fatigue since last visit, as well as current fatigue.
The minimum score would be 0, maximum score would be 140.
Scores below reflect mean improvement in FSI score from baseline (visit 0) to endpoint (visit 8).
The FSI was used to measure safety and tolerability of study drug.
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
|
Hamilton Anxiety Inventory Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 14-items clinician-rated scale designed to measure anxiety severity.
Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 (symptom not persent) to 4 (severe symptom).
The total range is 0-56.
A total score of less than 17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 indicates mild to moderate severity, and a score of 25-30 indicates moderate to severe symptoms.
In this study, we compared the mean change in the Hamilton Anxiety scale from baseline to week 8 between guanfacine hyrdochloride and placebo-treated patients to assess safety and tolerability of study drug.
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
|
Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is both a self-administered or clinician-administered questionnaire. It is a user-friendly 5-item rating scale. The ASEX utilizes short, easy to understand, and less intrusive questions that explores the follwoing aspects of sexuality:
4. ability to reach orgasm 5. satisfaction from orgasm Scores can range from a minimum of 6 (indicating minimal problems with sexual functioning) to 36 (indicating maximum problems with sexual functioning). Mean change from baseline (visit 0) to endpoint (visit 8) are presented below. The ASEX was used to assess safety and tolerability of drug from baseline to endpoint |
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
|
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The HAM-D is a clinician administered multiple item scale used to provide an indication of depression symptom severity.
It is designed for adults.
Each item on the questionnaire is scored on a 3 or 5 point scale.
The HAM-D is comprised of 21 items, however, the total score is based on the sum of the scores from the first 17 items.
Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe.
Nine are scored from 0-2.
Thus the possible total score range is 0 (minimum) to 40 (maximum) with a higher score indicating greater severity of depression.
Accordingly, a low HAM-D score would indicate a better outcome.
Mean change scores from baseline (visit 0) to endpoint (visit 8) are presented below.
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Change From Baseline to Endpoint
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an effective instrument used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults.
It differentiates "poor" from "good" sleep by measuring seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction.
The individual self rates each of these seven areas of sleep.
Scoring of the answers is based on a 0 to 3 scale, whereby 3 reflects the negative extreme on the Likert Scale.
Total score range is from 0 to 21.
The mean improvement from baseline (visit 0) to endpoint (visit 8) are presented below.
PSQI was used to assess safety and tolerability of study drug.
|
0 weeks, 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joel L Young, MD, Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Adrenergic Agents
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Guanfacine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1129704 ADINT
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Adult Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruitingAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChina
-
NYU Langone HealthCorium, Inc.CompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
SunovionCompleted
-
Gaia AGUniversity Hospital, Saarland; Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie KielCompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGermany
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...TerminatedAdult Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)Australia
-
Universität des SaarlandesCompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGermany
-
SunovionCompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaShireCompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)United States
-
Medice Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH & Co KGCompletedAdult Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderGermany
-
SunovionCompletedAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Guanfacine Hydrochloride
-
ShireTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc.CompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSpain, United Kingdom, United States, Belgium, Portugal, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Sweden
-
ShireCompletedAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States, Canada
-
Rachel G. Greenberg, MD, MB, MHSEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsTerminatedHyperactivity in Children With Down Syndrome | Impulsivity in Children With Down SyndromeUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterShireCompletedAttention Deficit DisorderNetherlands
-
ShireCompleted
-
ShireCompletedAttention-deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderSpain, Belgium, United States, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Canada, France, Sweden
-
ShireCompletedAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
ShireCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSpain, United States, Germany, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Romania, United Kingdom, Sweden, Austria, Canada, France, Ireland
-
ShireCompletedPhobia, Social | Anxiety, Separation | Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)United States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedADHD | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States