Peripheral Sensory Input in Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP)

April 30, 2018 updated by: simon.haroutounian, Washington University School of Medicine

How "Central" is Central Post-stroke Pain? Investigating the Role of Peripheral Sensory Input in Maintaining Central Pain

Prospective, open-label study in 10 patients with Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP). The study will evaluate the effects of peripheral nerve blockade on spontaneous pain and evoked thermal and mechanical responses in CPSP, and assesses the associated local anesthetic pharmacokinetics.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Each subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥18;
  • CPSP affecting an upper or a lower limb, in a distribution that may be completely covered by a peripheral nerve block;
  • Patient fulfills all mandatory criteria for CPSP, fulfills at least one supportive criteria, and has definite CPSP by probability grading.
  • Pain duration at least 3 months;
  • Spontaneous pain intensity (average pain in past week) of ≥ 4 on 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects will not be enrolled if any of the following criteria exist:

  • Not giving consent to participate in the study;
  • Significant psychiatric or cognitive impairment;
  • Moderate to severe renal or liver failure;
  • Concomitant treatment with warfarin or other anticoagulants;
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pain testing

Completion of NPSI questionnaire

Sensory mapping of the affected limb

Quantitative Sensory Testing

Patients will have a peripheral nerve blockade

Patients will have a peripheral nerve blockade with a local anesthetic (lidocaine)

Assessment of spontaneous and evoked pain responses

Completion of NPSI questionnaire

Mapping of the affected limb

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in Spontaneous Pain Intensity After a Peripheral Nerve Block.
Time Frame: baseline and 30 minutes
Reduction in spontaneous pain intensity in the painful extremity from baseline to 30 minutes after a peripheral nerve block.Spontaneous pain intensity was measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain", and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable"
baseline and 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Intensity of Cold Sensation
Time Frame: baseline and 30 min
The intensity of cold sensation (application of roller cooled down to 20 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful cold); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no cold sensation)
baseline and 30 min
Change in the Intensity of Warm Sensation
Time Frame: baseline and 30 min
The intensity of warm sensation (application of roller heated up to 40 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful hot); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no warmth sensation)
baseline and 30 min
Change in the Intensity of Pinprick Sensation
Time Frame: baseline and 30 min
The intensity of pinprick sensation (application of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament #6.1, ~100g target force) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful sharp); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no pricking sensation)
baseline and 30 min
Change in the Intensity of Brush Sensation
Time Frame: baseline and 30 min
The intensity of brush sensation (application of SENSELab Brush-05) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful brushing sensation); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no brushing sensation)
baseline and 30 min
Reported Pain/Dysesthesia Descriptors on NPSI Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 40 min

Composite scores on NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) questionnaire before and 40 minutes after the peripheral nerve block.

The NPSI assesses participant ranking of specific neuropathic pain descriptors, each ranked on a 0-10 scale, where 0 represents no burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc), and 10 represents worst burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc).

The scores on individual questions are grouped (averaged) into the three following subscales (each subscale scores ranging from 0 to 10):

  • Burning pain
  • Paroxysmal pain
  • Paresthesia/dysesthesia
baseline and 40 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simon Haroutounian, PHD, Washington Univesity School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Post Stroke Pain

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block with 2% lidocaine

Subscribe