Daylight-mediated Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses:Comparing 0.2%HAL With 16%MAL

Daylight-mediated Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses: a Randomized, Double-blinded Pilot Study Comparing Topical 0.2% Hexylaminolaevulinate With 16% Methylaminolaevulinate

This pilot study compares two photosensitizers, hexylaminolaevulinate (HAL) and methylaminolaevulinate (MAL), in treatment of actinic keratoses. Study is conducted using randomized split-face design. Efficacy is assessed clinically, and histologically at 3 and 12 months. Pain during and after treatments and adverse reactions at one week are recorded.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study recruites 16-20 voluuntering patients with symmetrical actinic damage on face or scalp. Treatment sites are randomized to receive either hexylaminolaevulinate 0.2% or methylaminolaevulinate ( 16% MAL) as photosensitizers (0.25mm-thick layer). A web-based validated program (Research Randomizer) generated a randomized list to define the treatment sides. The randomization results were kept blinded from the investigators who conducted the follow-up visits, from the pathologist, and the patients. Pre-treatment procedures include application of sunscreen for 15 minutes and curettage of the treatment area. Illumination is performed using 2 hours daylight-exposure. Efficacy is assessed clinically, and histologically at 3 and 12 months by blinded observers. Pain during and after treatments and adverse reactions at one week are recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lahti, Finland, 15850
        • Päijät-Häme Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Symmetrical actinic damage on face or scalp

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Lactation
  • Allergy to photosensitizer
  • Photodermatose

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HAL cream and MAL cream
0.2% HAL (Hexvix, Photocure) mixed with Unguentum M (Allmiral) and MAL (Metvix, Galderma) used in a randomized split-face design
0.2% Hexylaminolaevulinate (Hexvix, Photocure) mixed with Unguentum M (Allmiral) cream (2014)
Other Names:
  • HAL
  • Hexvix, Photocure
MAL 16% is used as photosensitizer for daylight-PDT
Other Names:
  • MAL
  • 16% Methylaminolaevulinate (Metvix, Galderma) cream

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histological Lesion Clearance
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Punch biopsies were taken symmetrically on both treatment fields from equally graded >6 mm AKs prior to treatment and again at 3 months, blinded observer (pathologist). HE- and p53-stainings. Samples not fulfilling the criteria of an AK were defined as healthy or completely cleared. The p53 reactivity expressed as average percentage of positive nuclei in three consecutive high power fields from the region of highest reactivity (<10 % normal)
Baseline, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Lesion Clearance
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Clinical lesion clearance is observed by a blinded observer
Baseline, 3 months
Adverse Reactions
Time Frame: One week
Adverse reactions are evaluated by blinded observer at one week after treatment. Severity of the reaction ( Redness, crusting and scaling) is assessed using grading: minimal, mild, intermediate, severe.
One week
Pain Assesment (Visual Analog Scale)
Time Frame: 12 hours
Pain using visual analog scale (VAS 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) on both treatment sides is assessed in every 30 minutes during 2-hour sun-exposure and afterwards once in two hours until 9 p.m. (treatment day). Of these values, the mean maximal pain is assessed.
12 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clearance of Field Cancerization in Hyperspectral Images
Time Frame: 3 months
Data not collected
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noora E Neittaanmäki-Perttu, MD, Päijät-Häme Cnetral Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Study Director: Mari Grönroos, MD, PhD, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

International peer-reviewed publication

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on Hexylaminolaevulinate cream

Subscribe