Phase II HDM-SPIRE Safety and Efficacy Study

May 16, 2018 updated by: Circassia Limited

A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Field Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of HDM-SPIRE in Subjects With a History of House Dust Mite-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis

The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment effect of three treatment regimens of HDM-SPIRE vs placebo and to evaluates the treatment effect of HDM-SPIRE on symptoms, rescue medication usage, Quality of Life and Sleep Quality

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

715

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      • London, Ontario, Canada
      • Niagara, Ontario, Canada
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      • Windsor, Ontario, Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
      • St Romuald, Quebec, Canada
      • Trois Rivieres, Quebec, Canada
    • Marne
      • Reims, Marne, France
    • Pessac
      • Gironde, Pessac, France
    • Strasbourg
      • Bas Rhin, Strasbourg, France
    • Vandoeuvre Les Nancy
      • Meurthe-et-Moselle, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
    • Baden Wuerttemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden Wuerttemberg, Germany
    • Nordrhein Westfalen
      • Essen, Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany
      • Goch, Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany
    • Saxony
      • Dresden, Saxony, Germany
      • Genova, Italy
      • Milano, Italy
      • Parma, Italy
      • Pavia, Italy
      • Roma, Italy
      • Siena, Italy
    • Torrette Di Ancona
      • Ancona, Torrette Di Ancona, Italy
      • Almere, Netherlands
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
      • Beek, Netherlands
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
      • Ottawa, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
      • Umkomaas, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Sevilla, Spain
    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain
    • Catalonia
      • Girona, Catalonia, Spain
    • Guipuzcoa
      • San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Spain
    • Navarre
      • Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
    • Vizcaya
      • Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States
      • Long Beach, California, United States
      • Mission Viejo, California, United States
      • Napa, California, United States
      • Orange, California, United States
      • Redwood City, California, United States
      • Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States
      • Roseville, California, United States
      • San Diego, California, United States
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
    • Florida
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Normal, Illinois, United States
      • Shiloh, Illinois, United States
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
    • Maine
      • Bangor, Maine, United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
      • Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
      • Plymouth, Minnesota, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • Nebraska
      • Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Ocean City, New Jersey, United States
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
      • Verona, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States
      • Rockville Centre, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Canton, Ohio, United States
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Kerrville, Texas, United States
      • Plano, Texas, United States
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
    • Vermont
      • South Burlington, Vermont, United States
    • Virginia
      • Henrico, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Bellingham, Washington, United States
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
      • Vancouver, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged 18-65 years.
  • Moderate to severe rhinoconjunctivitis on exposure to HDM for at least 1 years.
  • Mean TRSS ≥10
  • Positive skin prick test to Der p and Der f.
  • Dep p and Der f specific IgE ≥0.7 kU/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of asthma requiring Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 3 (www.ginasthma.org)or higher treatment
  • FEV1 <80% of predicted.
  • Clinically significant confounding symptoms of allergy to seasonal allergens during the final evaluation period.
  • Significant symptoms of another clinically relevant illness that is likely to affect scoring of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
  • Clinically relevant abnormalities detected on physical examination.
  • History of severe drug allergy, severe angioedema or anaphylactic reaction to food.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: HMD-SPIRE Treatment 1
4 x 12 nmol HDM-SPIRE followed by 4 x placebo 4 weeks apart
1 dose every 4 weeks
1 dose every 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: HDM-SPIRE Treatment 2
4 x 12 nmol HDM-SPIRE 4 weeks apart followed by a second course of 4 x 12 nmol HDM-SPIRE 4 weeks apart
1 dose every 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: HDM-SPIRE Treatment 3
4 x 20 nmol HDM-SPIRE followed by 4 x placebo 4 weeks apart
1 dose every 4 weeks
1 dose every 4 weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
8 x placebo 4 weeks apart
1 dose every 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined Score of Symptoms and Allergy Medication
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

The primary endpoint was mean Combined Score (CS) over a 3 week period (50-52 weeks after randomisation) in the HDM-SPIRE treatment groups compared with the mean CS in the placebo group. A higher score indicated more severe symptoms or greater use of allergy rescue medication and thus a low score indicated a better outcome.

CS = Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) + Rescue Medication Score (RMS). Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing, blocked nose and itchy nose and 4 non-nasal symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=severe); TRSS was divided by the number of symptoms (8) to provide an average score per symptom of 0-3.

The RMS score ranged from 0 (no allergy rescue medication use per day) to 3 (at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid per day). The RMS score was not additive, and therefore the maximum RMS was 3 and the maximum CS was 6.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean RQLQ Score in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

The RQLQ (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) was completed by subjects at the end of the study (50-52 weeks after randomisation).

RQLQ is a validated method of assessing quality of life and has 28 questions in seven domains (activity limitation, sleep problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical problems and emotional function). Subjects recalled how their rhinoconjunctivitis had been during the last week and responded to each question on a seven-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment). Questions were equally weighted, and the RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 questions and could range from zero to six.

A higher score indicated greater impact on quality of life and thus a low score indicated a better outcome.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Participants Assessment of Change in Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Measured by Rating Overall Symptoms at the End of the Study Relative to Baseline
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

A Global Impression of Change in Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms assessment was completed by subjects at the final follow-up visit. Subjects rated their overall allergy symptoms at the end of the study relative to baseline on a seven-point scale as follows:0. very much better; 1. moderately better; 2. a little better; 3. unchanged; 4. a little worse; 5. moderately worse; 6. very much worse.

For reporting the individual categories were grouped as follows: moderately or very much better; any improvement; no change and any worsening. Subjects could therefore be reported in more than group and the total number reported does not match the overall number of participants analysed.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Mean TRSS in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

Mean Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) in HDM-SPIRE treatment groups compared with placebo.

Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 non-nasal symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome), therefore TRSS could range from 0 to 24. Higher TRSS reflected more severe symptom scores. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks, 50-52 weeks after randomisation.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Mean Non-nasal Score in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Group Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

Mean daily Total Non-nasal Symptom Score (TNNSS) in HDM-SPIRE treatment groups compared to placebo. TNNSS was the sum of all the non-nasal symptom scores (itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes; sore eyes) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TNNSS reflected more severe symptoms.

Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks, 50-52 weeks after randomisation.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Mean Nasal Score in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Group Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

TNSS (Total nasal symptom score) was the sum of all the nasal symptom scores (runny nose; sneezing; blocked nose; itchy nose) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TNSS reflected more severe symptoms.

Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks, 50-52 weeks after randomisation.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Mean RMS in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Group Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

Mean RMS (Rescue medication score) in HDM-SPIRE treatment groups compared with placebo groups.

The use of rhinoconjunctivitis rescue medications was recorded by the subject on a daily basis just before bedtime for approximately 21 days, 50-52 weeks after randomisation and was scored based on a previously published system as follows: 0 = no allergy rescue medication used per day; 0.5 = at least one dose of antihistamine eye drops used per day; 1 = at least one dose of oral antihistamine used per day; 2 = at least one dose of intranasal corticosteroid used per day; 3 = at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid used per day. The score was according to the highest level of rescue medication used and was not additive.

Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
Number of Days With no Rescue Medication Use in HDM-SPIRE Treatment Group Compared With Placebo
Time Frame: Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation
The number of well days, i.e., days with no moderately or severely annoying symptoms and with no rescue medication used was calculated for all subjects over a period of approximately 21 days, 50-52 weeks after randomisation.
Weeks 50 to 52 after randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TH005

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinoconjunctivitis

Clinical Trials on HDM-SPIRE

Subscribe