Enteral Feeding in Discharged Patients

January 22, 2015 updated by: University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

Randomised Trial of Enteral Feeding in Patients Discharged From Hospital Following Surgical Resection of an Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Patients due to undergo surgery for oesophageal and gastric malignancy are often malnourished. Up to 10% of patients preoperative weight may also be lost during the early postoperative period. Following discharge from hospital the mechanics of the surgery leads to a loss of gastric reservoir function, lack of appetite, altered intestinal motility and gastro-oesophageal reflux which usually results in reduced dietary intake and further weight loss. In patients who have undergone upper gastrointestinal resections there are no studies examining the benefit of nutritional supplementation following hospital discharge, however, studies in other groups of surgical patients have failed to show benefit. Despite patients who have undergone upper gastrointestinal surgery being 'at risk' nutritionally, there is no evidence demonstrating the value or not of nutritional supplementation following hospital discharge.

Hypothesis: The postoperative under nutrition seen after upper gastrointestinal surgery will exacerbate the reduced quality of life and fatigue patients' already experience. The investigators hypothesise that improving patient's nutritional intake following hospital discharge will improve their quality of life and fatigue levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery for cancer:

  1. Because of the nature of upper gastrointestinal surgery these patients have been shown to suffer undernutrition and weight loss after hospital discharge (up to 3 months) and to a greater extent than other groups of surgical patients. Quality of life and fatigue is a major issue after upper GI surgery.
  2. Nutritional supplementation via a jejunostomy after hospital discharge is only done routinely for all patients in 10%, and for selected patients in 20% of United Kingdom (UK) hospitals.
  3. Derriford hospital is very unusual in that 85% of patients are given home jejunal feeding.
  4. In Devon and Cornwall home enteral nutrition is delivered under contract by Fresenius Kabil (a global health care company).
  5. There are no studies of home nutritional supplementation in upper GI surgical patients.
  6. Studies of home nutritional supplementation in surgical patients having undergone colorectal surgery have not shown clinical or Quality of Life (QoL) benefit despite weight gain.
  7. The process of enteral nutrition may be associated with a reduction in quality of life.
  8. There is a need for a clinical trial to establish the benefit of home enteral nutritional supplementation. The results of any such trial may influence the highly variable nutritional present practice and may influence the surgeons desire to place a feeding jejunostomy (or not) at surgery which is associated with clinical complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Devon
      • Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
        • Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients able to give written informed consent,
  • Have had a feeding jejunostomy placed at surgery,
  • Competent (or their carer) to set up and use the jejunostomy feeding apparatus themselves.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in another interventional trial,
  • Age <18,
  • Pre-operative BMI > 35,
  • Pre-operative BMI <18,
  • Oral intake at hospital discharge of > 90% of requirements,
  • It is felt that they or their carers would not to cope with home tube feeding Patients unable to give written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Jejunal feeding
Nutritional supplementation via their jejunostomies for six weeks post hospital discharge, with continued assessment for a further 18 weeks.
A feeding jejunostomy tube is inserted at the time of surgery to provide enteral nutritional support.
No Intervention: No jejunal feeding
No jejunal feeding of patients for six weeks following hospital discharge, with continued assessment for a further 18 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: 18 weeks
The primary outcome will therefore be fatigue as measured by the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) score. The MFI-20 is divided into five scales: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue.
18 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 18 weeks
We will use the oesophagus specific quality of life (QLQ-OES18) scale. The QLQ-OES18 scale is a disease specific Health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire, designed to examine the influence of upper gastrointestinal pathology on patients and improvement in HRQL following treatment.
18 weeks
Health economic analysis
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Health economic analysis will be based on the EuroQol (EQ 5D) scale 4 (this scale defines health in terms of five dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and anxiety).
18 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stephen J Lewis, MBBS, MD, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R&D 11/P/022
  • 10/H0106/80 (Other Identifier: National Research Ethics Service)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Resection of an Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Clinical Trials on Jejunal feeding

Subscribe