Ridge Preservation With New Class of Osteoplastic Materials (RP)

April 19, 2019 updated by: Alex Gurin, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Comparison of Octacalcium Phosphate Synthetic Bone Graft (OctoFor) and Bovine-derived Bone (Bio-Oss) for Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction: Open, Prospective, Non-Randomised Clinical Trial

Return to normal life and shortening rehabilitation period of patients after surgical removal of teeth is important and urgent social problem. In this regard, higher demands for quality of care and treatment of patients, which requires the development of new approaches to the treatment of patients, the introduction of new technologies and the associated development of new materials . Serious problem of contemporary oral and maxillo-facial surgery and dentistry is augmentation of bone defects generated during the surgical treatment of diseases and injuries of the bones. The results of surgical repair of bone defects are more dependent on the course of the process of reparative osteogenesis. Long-term periods of clinical studies indicate that reparative osteogenesis in posttraumatic bone defects is slow - months and years, and in some cases no bone defects filled with bone tissue.

This project aims at addressing the preservation of bone volume in humans after tooth extraction using biomaterials with optimum performance. The practical significance of the project is to establish an effective tissue response and, thus, possible subsequent quality installation of dental implants. The proposed solution is based on the scientific development of the operative techniques, and a comparative analysis of several classes of biomaterials (xenogenic and synthetic analogs), including the use of biological precursors of bone apatite mineralization having osteoinductive (stimulating) properties.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RU
      • Moscow, RU, Russian Federation, 119991
        • Cental Scientific Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 81 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have voluntarily signed the informed consent
  • Males and females, 18 years to 75 years of age
  • Patient needs single tooth extraction in mandibular or maxillary incisor or pre-molar region and would benefit from prosthetic reconstruction with a dental implant
  • Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent
  • Patient in good general health as documented by self assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

Systemic exclusion criteria:

  • Patient who has any known diseases (not including controlled diabetes mellitus), infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation
  • Female patient who are pregnant or lactating or of child bearing potential not using acceptable methods of birth control (hormonal, barriers or abstinence
  • Patient who are on chronic treatment (i.e., two weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, cyclosporine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) within one month of baseline visit
  • Patient who knowingly has HIV or Hepatitis
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromisation
  • Patient who is a heavy smoker (>10/cigarettes per day).

Local exclusion criteria

  • Uncontrolled or untreated periodontal disease
  • Patient who has a full mouth plaque level >30 % at the enrolment visit
  • History of local radiation therapy
  • Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
  • Persistent intraoral infection
  • Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease
  • Patient presents an acute endodontic lesion in the test tooth or in the neighbouring areas to the experimental procedure (sites with presence of an asymptomatic chronic lesion are eligible)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Octacalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Octacalcium phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Octacalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Other Names:
  • OctoFor
Active Comparator: Bio-Oss
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Bio-Oss (bovine-derived xenograft)in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Bio-Oss (bovine-derived xenograft)in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide
Active Comparator: Tricalcium phosphate
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Tricalcium phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Bone augmentation, after tooth extraction, with Tricalcium Phosphate (synthetic bone graft material) in combination with resorbable collagen membrane Bio-Gide.
Other Names:
  • TriCafor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The changes of bone level between baseline and 3 months post-extraction at the time of implantation
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months post-extraction
A prefabricated stent will be used as an anchor point. After tooth extraction size of dehiscence of buccal bone from anchor point to the alveolar crest will be measured (baseline). Socket will be filled with biomaterial. After 3 months of healing at the time of implant placement the same stent will be used as an anchor point to measure size of dehiscence after socket preservation.
baseline and 3 months post-extraction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent new vital bone formation
Time Frame: 3 month
Bone core biopsy will be evaluated histologically for percent new vital bone formation at the time of implantation
3 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent residual graft material and percent connective tissue
Time Frame: 3 month
Bone core biopsy will be evaluated histologically for percent residual bone graft material and percent connective tissue
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anatoly Kulakov, Prof, Central Scientific Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-13 (Other Identifier: The I.M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Extraction

Clinical Trials on Octacalcium phosphate

Subscribe