Clinical Validation of Lophius Biosciences Kit T-Track® CMV in Allo-HSCT Recipients (AlloProtectCMV)

August 7, 2018 updated by: Lophius Biosciences GmbH

Clinical Validation of an Improved T-Track® CMV Assay to Assess the Functionality of CMV Protein-reactive Cell-mediated Immunity (CMI) and Its Suitability to Determine a Protective Cut-off Value for Recurrent CMV Reactivations in Allo-HSCT Recipients

This study in a cohort of allo-HSCT recipients aims to validate the suitability of an improved T-Track® CMV assay to assess the functionality of CMV protein-reactive effector cells and its suitability to determine cut-off values mediating protection from recurrent CMV reactivations in allo-HSCT recipients.

Lophius T-Track® CMV represents a highly standardized and sensitive diagnostic tool to assess the functionality of a network of clinically relevant CMV-reactive effector cells. It is based on the stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with activated immunodominant CMV proteins, pp65 and IE-1, and the subsequent quantification of CMV-specific CMI (spot forming colonies) using a highly sensitive IFN-γ ELISpot.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with significant morbidity and increased overall mortality. Patients are generally pre-emptively treated with antiviral medication after elevated levels of CMV copies in peripheral blood or plasma have been detected by quantitative PCR. However, these CMV reactivations are often subclinical and do not lead to complications or CMV disease. In these cases functional CMV- specific effector cells have been shown to mediate protection from clinical symptoms. Monitoring of CMV- specific effector cells after allo-HSCT could help to prevent severe side effects due to unnecessary antiviral treatment.

Since the majority of patients develops more than one episode of CMV reactivation, determination of functional CMV-reactive effector cells of cell mediated immunity (CMI) could also help to predict the likelihood of relapsing CMV reactivations and thereby adjust the need for and duration of secondary prophylaxis.

Currently available techniques to measure CMV-specific effector cells lack either a functional read out (multimer stain) or are time consuming and difficult to standardize (detection of intracellular interferon gamma (IFN-ᵞ) after in vitro stimulation using flow cytometry). The improved T-Track® CMV assay has the advantage of combining a standardized and highly sensitive test system with a functional read out (IFN-ᵞ production) considering the function of antigen presenting cells (APC) and different populations of clinically relevant effector cells (CTL, T helper-, NK-, NKT cells). Based on experiences of the performance of this assay system in healthy individuals and hemodialysis patients (the latter as part of a performance evaluation - EUDAMED number 00015561) the presented trial aims to validate an improved variant of this test (including optimized, LPS-depleted IE-1 protein) with regard to its suitability to predict freedom from relapse of CMV-reactivation following treatment of CMV reactivation in a cohort of 120-150 patients after allo-HSCT. Moreover, the results will be compared to (i) analysis of leukocyte subpopulations and (ii) multimer techniques detecting CMV-specific CD8 positive T lymphocytes (CTL) (optional).

Demonstrating the suitability of the improved T-Track® CMV assay to identify patients at reduced risk for recurrent CMV-reactivation, CMV disease or GvHD would highly improve and optimize follow-up care after allo-HSCT regarding therapy success as well as reduced public health care costs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the first time, being either CMV seropositive or receiving a graft from a CMV seropositive donor or both, donor and recipient are CMV seropositive

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation being either CMV seropositive or receiving a graft from a CMV seropositive donor or both, donor and recipient are CMV seropositive (D+/R-, D-/R+, D+/R+)
  • Patients receiving a first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell graft
  • Patient at least 18 years of age
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Seronegativity for CMV both for patient and donor (D-/R-)
  • Patients receiving standard anti-CMV prophylaxis
  • Patients receiving a haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell graft
  • Patients receiving an umbilical cord blood graft
  • Patients treated with Alemtuzumab (e.g. Campath)
  • Patient has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator may invalidate communication with the investigator
  • Lack or withdrawal of informed consent
  • Patient is unable to comply with the visit schedule in the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Allo-HSCT recipients
Patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the first time, being either CMV seropositive or receiving a graft from a CMV seropositive donor or both, donor and recipient are CMV seropositive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determination of changes in pp65 and/or IE-1 specific CMI applying T-Track® CMV
Time Frame: days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications
days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in CMV viral load measured by CMV-PCR
Time Frame: As defined in the respective guidelines of the participating institutes, at least in parallel with T-Track® CMV, any time between day 0 - 225
As defined in the respective guidelines of the participating institutes, at least in parallel with T-Track® CMV, any time between day 0 - 225
Determination of frequencies of leukocyte subpopulations
Time Frame: In parallel with T-Track® CMV, thus days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications
Numbers of naïve (CD45RA) and memory (CD45RO) CD4 and CD8 positive T cells (CD3) as well as NK cells (CD56) and monocytes (CD14) determined by flow cytometry
In parallel with T-Track® CMV, thus days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determination of numbers of CMV-specific CTL applying a multimer staining for CMV epitopes
Time Frame: In parallel withT-Track® CMV, thus days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications, optional
In parallel withT-Track® CMV, thus days 45, 60 and 80 post Tx as well as at any time between day 45 - 225 in case of CMV-complications, optional
Determination of occurrence and severity of GvHD
Time Frame: Any time during study period (day 0 - 225)
Any time during study period (day 0 - 225)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Wolff, Prof. Dr. med., Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Hämatologie und Onkologie Regensburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cytomegalovirus Infection

Subscribe