Randomized Trial of Y Mesh vs Dual Mesh

November 10, 2020 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle Y Mesh vs. Restorelle Dual Flat Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh versus the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Hypothesis: Suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh will be faster than when using the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Design: Randomized single-blind prospective clinical trial

Primary Outcomes:

  1. Total Suturing time for mesh placement = time from insertion of Y mesh or first flat mesh arm into pelvis to last sacral suture placed
  2. Total Case time = Incision to end of closure

Secondary Outcomes:

Post-operative patient outcomes at 24-months

  • Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Inventory (PFDI-20)
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI)
  • Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)
  • Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI)
  • Objective Recurrence (POP-Q)
  • Subjective Recurrence (vaginal bulge)
  • Reported mesh erosion

Study Population: Study subjects will be recruited from patients that present to the Center of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Cleveland Clinic main campus, Hillcrest Hospital and Fairview Hospital, and their surgeries will be performed at either one of these sites.

Study Procedures:

Study Identification and Recruitment Potential subjects will be identified by members of the Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery at the Cleveland Clinic main campus and Fairview Hospital. Eligible patients that agree to participate will be provided written informed consent administered by the collaborators listed on this Investigational Research Board (IRB) proposal at Cleveland Clinic Main campus and Fairview Hospitals.

Randomization All subjects will be predetermined by their surgeon to undergo either a laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy depending upon their clinical evaluation. The participants will then be randomized to either Y mesh or dual flat mesh sacrocolpopexy according to a computer-generated randomization schedule with random block sizes with the use of the SAS statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Randomization will be carried out by provider. All patients will be blinded to their assignment.

Office Interventions In addition to a standardized evaluation including the history and physical examination, patients will be asked to complete the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire at the pre-operative visit as well as the 6, 12 and 24-month postoperative visit. Completion of these questionnaire is the only additional assessment that is specific to participation in this study and is not usually included as part of the standard care of sacrocolpopexy. It should take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The study subjects will not be exposed to any additional risk by participating in this study except for the inconvenience of completing the questionnaire.

Surgical Interventions Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy will be performed using four ports: an umbilical port for the laparoscope, two ports (either 5 or 10/12 mm) in the bilateral lower quadrants, and one 5-mm port placed at the level of the umbilicus, lateral to the rectus muscle on either side for retraction. The robotic-assisted hysterectomy will be performed using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using five ports: a 12mm umbilical port for the laparoscopic, two 8 mm robotic ports placed 2cm inferior and 9-10cm lateral to the umbilicus bilaterally, an 8mm robotic port placed in the left axillary line at the level of the umbilicus, and a 8mm or 10/12mm accessory port either in the right upper quadrant approximately 3cm distal from the costal margin, or in the right lower quadrant, 2cm above and medial to the anterior superior iliac spine.

If a supracervical hysterectomy is to be performed, it will be done in a standard fashion. A uterine manipulator will be placed inside of the uterus. The round ligaments will be transected using cautery. The fallopian tubes and ovaries will be left in situ or removed at the time of hysterectomy depending upon the preoperative decision made between the surgeon and patient. The uterine arteries and cardinal ligaments will be cauterized laparoscopically. The uterus will be amputated at the level of the internal cervical os and the endocervical canal will be cauterized.

The sacrocolpopexy will also be performed and in a standard fashion. An end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) sizer will be placed in the vagina for manipulation of the apex as well as in the rectum for delineation of the rectovaginal septum. First, the presacral dissection will be performed with a longitudinal peritoneal incision over the sacral promontory and there is identification of the anterior longitudinal ligament. Dissection is then done caudally through the peritoneum and subperitoneal fat down to the level of the posterior cul-de-sac. The vagina is elevated cephalad using the EEA sizer and the peritoneum overlying the anterior vaginal apex is incised transversely, and the bladder is dissected off the anterior vagina using sharp dissection, creating a 4 to 5 cm pocket. If this plane is difficult to establish, the bladder will be filled in a retrograde fashion to find the correct dissection plane. Similarly, the peritoneum overlying the posterior vagina is incised, and dissection is then done overlying the vagina and extending into the posterior cul-de-sac, creating a 4 to 5 cm pocket. Once dissection is complete, the mesh graft is prepared. Subjects will have been randomized to either one of two mesh grafts:

  1. Restorelle Y mesh

    • The mesh is introduced into the pelvis through one of the ports.
    • First, either then anterior or the posterior arm is fixed to the anterior or posterior vaginal wall using 5 delayed- absorbable (PDS) No. 2-0 sutures in an interrupted fashion, 1 to 2 cm apart from each other.
    • The opposing arm of the graft is then attached to either the anterior or posterior vaginal wall, depending on which arm was placed first, in a similar fashion using 5 delayed- absorbable (PDS) No. 2-0 sutures in an interrupted fashion, 1 to 2 cm apart from each other.
    • The stem portion of the graft is then brought to the sacral promontory and sutured to the anterior longitudinal ligament using 2 permanent (prolene) No. 0 sutures. The excess mesh is then trimmed.
  2. Restorelle dual flat mesh: 2 pieces of 15 x 4 cm mesh

    • One mesh arm is introduced into the pelvis through one of the ports.
    • The arm is fixed to the anterior or posterior vaginal wall using 5 delayed- absorbable (PDS) No. 2-0 sutures in an interrupted fashion, 1 to 2 cm apart from each other.
    • The second mesh arm is then introduced into the pelvis through one of the ports.
    • The arm is fixed to either the anterior or posterior vaginal wall, depending on where the first arm was placed, using 5 delayed- absorbable (PDS) No. 2-0 sutures in an interrupted fashion, 1 to 2 cm apart from each other.
    • The two arms are then brought to the sacral promontory and sutured together to the anterior longitudinal ligament using 2 permanent (prolene) No. 0 sutures. The excess mesh is then trimmed.

The peritoneum is then closed over the exposed graft with absorbable suture. Routine cystoscopy will also be performed in order to assess for lower urinary tract injury. A vaginal exam is performed, and an anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy are performed if needed. Anti-incontinence procedures may also be performed if needed.

**In laparoscopic cases, all suturing will be done extracorporeally while intracorporeal knot-tying technique will be performed in robot assisted laparoscopic cases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18, who are to undergo laparoscopic or robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Other concomitant laparoscopic or prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures (e.g., laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, cystocele repair, rectocele repair or mid-urethral sling procedures) will be performed at the primary surgeon's discretion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to comprehend written and/or spoken English
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Medical illness precluding laparoscopy
  • Need for concomitant surgeries not related to pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence
  • Sacrocolpoperineopexy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cololast, Inc. Restorell Y mesh
Y mesh
Y mesh
Other Names:
  • Cololast, Inc. Restorell Y mesh
Active Comparator: Coloplast, Inc. Restorelle Dual flat mesh
Dual flat mesh
Dual flat mesh
Other Names:
  • Coloplast, Inc. Restorelle Dual flat mesh

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total Suturing Time for Mesh Placement = Time From Insertion of Y Mesh or First Flat Mesh Arm Into Pelvis to Last Sacral Suture Placed
Time Frame: one day intraoperative
one day intraoperative
Total OR Time = Operating Room Time of Entry and Exit
Time Frame: one day intraoperative
one day intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Mean Difference POPDI at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Mean difference between baseline (pre-procedure) and 24-months post-procedure. The POPDI is a six-item measure from the PFDI-20 which measures 6 different pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and degree of bother. The scale exists from 0-100 (0=no symptoms, 100=worse symptoms).
24 months
Postoperative Mean Difference CRADI at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Mean difference between baseline (pre-procedure) and 24-months post-procedure. The CRADI is a eight-item measure from the PFDI-20 which measures 8 different pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and degree of bother. The scale exists from 0-100 (0=no symptoms, 100=worse symptoms).
24 months
Postoperative Mean Difference UDI at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Mean difference between baseline (pre-procedure) and 24-months post-procedure. The UDI is a six-item measure from the PFDI-20 which measures 6 different pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and degree of bother. The scale exists from 0-100 (0=no symptoms, 100=worse symptoms).
24 months
Postoperative Subjective Recurrence at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Subjective Recurrence was defined as patients who complained of vaginal bulge symptoms (Question #3 on the PFDI-20).
24 months
Postoperative Objective Recurrence at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Objective Recurrence
24 months
Reported Mesh Erosion at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months
Mesh Erosion was defined as presence of eroded mesh in the vagina on examination postoperatively up to 24-months after surgery.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cecile Unger, M.D., The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-354

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Y mesh

Subscribe