Non Interventional Study (NIS) Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis

January 8, 2015 updated by: Bitop AG

Non Interventional Study Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis

In this observational study insights regarding the tolerability and influence on the quality of life of the topical treatment Ectoin Mund- and Rachenspray compared to Emser Pastillen in patients with acute Pharyngitis/ Laryngitis under real life conditions shall be gained.

Patients are treated with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen according to the demands of the physician and the instructions for use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Norbert Pasch-Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
      • Aachen, Germany, 52078
        • HNO Praxis Aachen Brand
      • Duisburg, Germany, 47051
        • HNO Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme
      • Jülich, Germany, 52428
        • Dr. Lenzenhuber-Fachärztin für HNO Heilkunde
      • Jülich, Germany, 52428
        • Wilhelm Schütz -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
      • Köln, Germany, 50667
        • Taufik Shahab -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
      • Köln, Germany, 50933
        • Bey - Facharzt f. HNO Heilkunde
      • Köln, Germany, 50935
        • HNO-Praxis Peter Hinterkausen & Dr. med. Eva Bottler-Neufert

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Primary care unit In this non interventional study the therapy process of a total of 90 patients with acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis for which the physician has planned a therapy with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1% (60 Patients) or Emser Pastillen (30 patients) shall be observed in 8 clinical centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute Laryngitis and/or Pharyngitis which are already treated with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications according to instructions for use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray
treatment with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1%
Emser Pastillen
treatment with Emser Pastillen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pharyngitis symptom score evaluated by the physician
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days)

Assessment of the symptoms of pharyngitis on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate strong):

  • swollen palatine tonsils
  • swollen lymph nodes in the throat
  • fever
  • cough
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient's general condition evaluated by the physician
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Physician's assessment of the general conditions on a 4 point scale (good condition, slightly reduced condition, bad condition, very bad condition)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Change in Evaluation of the hoarseness
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
physician's assessment of the hoarseness of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Change in Dysphagia
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
physician's assessment of dysphagia of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Change in efficacy evaluation by the physician
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 1 week)
Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 1 week)
Change in efficacy evaluation by the patient
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0_bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)
Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the physician
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))
Assessment of the tolerability by the physician on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))
Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the patient
Time Frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))
Assessment of the tolerability by the patient on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))
Change in number and type of adverse events
Time Frame: Visit 2 (after 3 days) Visit 3 (after 7 days)
incidence of adverse events and correlation with the therapy
Visit 2 (after 3 days) Visit 3 (after 7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralph Mösges, MD, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pharyngitis

Subscribe