Optimizing Resilience In Orofacial Pain and Nociception (ORION)

August 2, 2016 updated by: University of Florida

Assessing the Efficacy of a Hope Intervention in Temporomandibular Disorder

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a hope-based intervention on clinical and experimental pain in individuals with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). To examine the effectiveness of this intervention, a two-arm randomized trial will be conducted with 50 individuals, between the ages of 18 and 65, who have TMD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the contribution of positive psychological factors (e.g., optimism, pain acceptance, hope) to pain and pain-related coping. Although research supports the significance of these resilience factors in pain adaptation, psychological interventions based upon bolstering resilience have received far less attention. Emerging evidence supports the role of hope in psychosocial adjustment and enhancement of adaptive pain coping skills. Hope is considered to be a positive motivational state consisting of one's belief in their ability to generate routes to achieve goals (pathways) and initiation towards attaining these goals (agency). In the context of pain, increasing hope may promote augmentation of personal strengths to enhance development of meaningful goal pursuits and foster resilient outcomes. Enhancement of hopeful thinking and behavior may ultimately lead to the minimization of losses that are often associated with chronic pain. This experience may be also reflected physiologically, as increasing hope may confer biological benefits (e.g., decreased inflammation). Although hope-based interventions have been successfully applied in other clinical conditions (i.e., cancer), their utility in chronic pain disorders has not been examined.

To examine the effectiveness of this approach, a two-arm randomized trial will be conducted with individuals who have TMD. In Study Arm 1, participants will receive hope-based therapy. In Study Arm 2, participants will receive pain education. Participants will attend 5 sessions over a period of 5 weeks. Two of these sessions will involve quantitative sensory pain testing; three sessions will include delivery of the treatment intervention. Pain outcomes will be measured at pre- and post-treatment.

Aims:

  1. Examine the degree to which state and trait levels of hope are predictive of clinical pain, disability, affective distress, and experimental pain.
  2. Investigate the effects of a hope intervention, as compared to an education control group, on clinical and experimental pain in individuals with TMD.
  3. Identify psychosocial (e.g., hope, optimism, positive affect, catastrophizing), biological (e.g., inflammatory, endogenous opioid, neuroendocrine), and psychophysical factors associated with positive treatment response (i.e., reduction of clinical pain).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida, Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participants between the ages of 18 and 65
  • meets Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD
  • duration of pain is at least 3 months
  • pain at least 15 days in the past month
  • pain rated moderate to severe in intensity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • current heart disease including heart failure
  • kidney failure or currently undergoing dialysis
  • current neurological conditions that could affect protocol safety or validity
  • facial trauma or orofacial surgery within the last 6 months
  • currently in orthodontic treatment
  • currently pregnant and/or nursing
  • use of narcotic analgesics (i.e., opioids) on a daily basis
  • a primary pain condition other than TMD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hope Therapy
Patients assigned to this arm will receive Hope Therapy in three individual intervention sessions. Intervention will be administered by an experienced therapist.Training focuses on effective goal setting and augmenting hopeful thinking.
Hope therapy is designed to address key components of hope theory through augmentation of hopeful thinking and enhancement of goal-directed activities. Training focuses on effective goal setting, mobilization of internal resources to reach goals, identification of resilience factors to formulate hopeful thinking, and enhancing maintenance of future goal development.
Other: Pain Education
Patients assigned to this arm will receive Pain Education in three individual intervention sessions. Intervention will be administered by an experienced therapist. Training will focus on understanding TMD-related pain and learning pain management techniques.
Pain Education is aimed to increase understanding of TMD symptomatology and etiology, as well as provide general education on pain, lifestyle management, and effective pain communication methods.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in state hope on the 8-point Adult State Hope Scale at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
The Adult State Hope Scale is a 6-item inventory used to assess goal-directed thinking at a given moment in time.
Baseline, Week 5
Change from baseline in clinical pain on the 0-100 Numerical Rating Scale at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
0-100 Numerical Rating Scale used to assess clinical pain intensity.
Baseline, Week 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in inflammatory, endogenous opioid, and neuroendocrine markers at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
Measurement of interleukin 6 (IL-6), beta-endorphin, cortisol, and alpha-amylase.
Baseline, Week 5
Change from baseline in optimism on the 5-point Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
The LOT-R is a 10-item measure assessing generalized positive outcome expectancies.
Baseline, Week 5
Change from baseline in positive and negative affect on the 5-point Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scale at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
The PANAS is a 20-item scale that assesses positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA).
Baseline, Week 5
Change from baseline in pain catastrophizing on the 5-point Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
The PCS is a 13-item measure used to assess patient report of catastrophic thinking about pain
Baseline, Week 5
Change from baseline in sensory pain stimuli at week 5
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 5
Measurement of heat pain threshold, heat pain tolerance, pressure pain threshold, cold pain threshold, and cold pain tolerance. Threshold = when stimulus (in seconds) is first rated as "painful"; Tolerance = when stimulus (in seconds) is no longer able to be tolerated.
Baseline, Week 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily J Bartley, Ph.D., University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disorder

Clinical Trials on Hope Therapy

Subscribe