Osteomyelitis: Procalcitonin to Diagnose and Monitor Osteomyelitis

The investigator plans a cohort study of 80 subjects admitted to hospital with a diabetic foot infection in order to compare serial bone biopsies (the current "gold standard") and procalcitonin to diagnose and monitor the effectiveness of therapy for osteomyelitis. The investigator will collect specimens as part of an existing trial to evaluate negative pressure wound therapy in diabetic infected wounds. A high proportion of these patients have osteomyelitis and will receive standard therapy including repeat bone biopsy and parenteral antibiotics. The investigator expects repeated measurement of procalcitonin will be highly correlated with repeated bone biopsy after antibiotic treatment has been completed to determine if therapy has been successful or if additional antibiotic therapy is needed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

There is a world-wide epidemic of diabetes. As part of the epidemic lower extremity amputations are dramatically increasing. Soft tissue and bone infections are one of the most common reasons for amputation. It is often difficult to determine if diabetic foot ulcers have an underlying bone infection. Inaccurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis leads to unnecessary antibiotic treatment, surgery, and amputation. In addition, we do not have good diagnostic tools to determine when osteomyelitis has been treated successfully.

The role of biomarkers specific to bone turnover (resorption and formation) in relation to bone infections is poorly understood. We know that remodeling is an essential function in bone physiology with increased osteoclast production leading to resorption of old bone coupled with increased osteoblast production associated with new bone formation. The balance between these two functions is known to be disrupted in disease states including osteoporosis, but has not been examined specifically in infected bone. Procalcitonin has been suggeasted as a tool to both diagnose and monitor the effectiveness of therapy for various infections, but there is very little work in diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Aim 1. To evaluate the role of procalcitonin as a screening tool to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis using bone culture and histopathology as the "gold standard" to establish the diagnosis.

Aim 2. To determine the role of procalcitonin as a management tool to determine osteomyelitis treatment success versus treatment failure (indicated by bone biopsy) after completing a standard course of antibiotics for 6 weeks.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-9132
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Age > 21, diabetes, Infectious Disease Society of America stage 3 infection (osteomyelitis)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Age ≥ 21 years
  • Infectious Disease Society of America stage 3 infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous bone infection in the study foot
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • HIV, Hepatitis, osteomyelitis at other sites

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Age > 21, diabetes, osteomyelitis
1 Cohort, standard care, observational patients are: Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus Age ≥ 21 years Infectious Disease Society of America stage 3 infection
This is one cohort standard care observational study. 40 diabetic patients admitted to Parkland hospital with a foot infection. We will enroll a representative cross section of subjects with diabetic foot infection. Patient will be consented and will receive therapy based on standard protocols. Currently patients with suspected osteomyelitis have bone biopsies to identify bacterial pathogens and verify MRI diagnosis. Repeat bone biopsies are performed at the end of therapy to verify that osteomyelitis has been successfully treated. Serum to measure procalcitonin will be obtained at baseline, week 3 and week 6. Tissue samples will be obtained at Baseline, Week 3 and Week 6 for tissue culture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(1.) wound healing,
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical examination. Per current standards, wound healing will be defined as complete granulation over the wound bed (primary intention) or wounds closed by surgical intervention. 80 subjects will be followed during the course of the study and the wound healing dates recorded for those subjects who heal.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(2.) limb salvage
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical examination. This outcome will be measured by the number of subjects not requiring amputation during the time frame of the study.
6 months
(3.) hospitalizations for recurrent diabetic foot infection
Time Frame: 6 months
The medical record will be reviewed on each subject and dates of hospitalizations for diabetic foot infection will be recorded.
6 months
(4.) surgical procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
The medical record will be reviewed for each subject, and the dates and surgical procedures will be recorded.
6 months
(5.) recurrent ulcers.
Time Frame: 6 months
The medical record will be reviewed for each subject and any recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers during the time frame of the study will be recorded. Data will include the date(s) of recurrence, location and size of the ulcer(s), and the presence or absence of infection.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Lavery, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on 1 cohort, standard care, observational

Subscribe