Interval Versus Continuous Training on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

June 18, 2014 updated by: KOLDO VILLELABEITIA JAUREGUIZAR, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz

Interval Versus Continuous Exercise Training on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Exercise therapy increase functional capacity improving the morbidity and mortality of patients with cardiovascular disease. Moderate continuous training is the best established training modality for this patients. However, a body of evidence has begun to emerge demonstrating that high intensity interval training obtained better results in terms of morbidity and mortality.

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine the effect of two types of exercise training: moderate continuous training vs high interval training on functional capacity and quality of life as well as verify the safety in its application.

We included 72 patients with coronary artery disease by assigning one of the training modality for 8 weeks. We analyzed cyclo-ergo-spirometry data, aspect related to quality of life as well as a record of adverse events.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain, 28342
        • Hospital Infanta Elena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Coronary heart Disease, with functional class II-III according to New York Heart Association classification system.
  • At least 4 weeks from acute cardiac event, percutaneous or surgery revascularization.
  • Optimized medical treatment in adequate doses ( betablockers, ACE inhibitors, ARA II, statins and antiplatelet drugs)
  • Age > 18 years old.
  • Willing to participate and sign an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residual ischemia waiting for revascularization.
  • Any cardiac event for the last 4 weeks
  • Abnormal Ergometry with hemodynamic or clinically significant arrhythmias during the procedure.
  • History of severe ventricular arrhythmia
  • Uncontrolled glycaemia or blood pressure
  • Moderate to severe Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease
  • Osteomuscular and/or mental disorder that hampers an adequate adherence to the intervention program
  • Other vascular diseases: rheumatologic/ autoimmune disorders, thrombopathies, hemophilia.
  • Active oncologic disease.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Moderate continuous exercise training
Moderate intensity continuous exercise training
Experimental: Interval exercise training
High intensity interval exercise training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact on functional capacity
Time Frame: 2 months
Basal and peak oxygen consumption values will be measured.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life
Time Frame: 2 months
Quality of life will be compared between the two arms with one generic questionnaire (SF-36) and one ischemic heart disease specific questionnaire (MacNew)
2 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 months
The incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in each group will be compared
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on Interval exercise training

3
Subscribe