The Acute Effect of Interval-walking (acute IWS)

February 26, 2014 updated by: Inge Holm, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Four months of interval walking training (IWT) is superior to energy-expenditure matched continuous walking training (CWT) with regards to weight loss and improvements in glycemic control. The reason for this is unclear. One potential explanation for the differential outcome in weight loss is excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), which is defined as the elevated oxygen consumption measured during the hours following an exercise bout. A large EPOC means greater energy expenditure which, if energy intake does not change, leads to a greater weight loss. This weight loss may subsequently improve glycemic control

  • Aim 1: To assess the effect of an acute bout of IWT vs. an acute bout of CWT on glycemic control in type 2 diabetics and to assess mechanisms responsible for differences (if any). It is hypothesised that IWT will be more advantageous for improving glycemic control.
  • Aim 2: To examine the effect of an acute bout of IWT vs. an acute bout of CWT on EPOC. It is hypothesised that IWT will produce an EPOC of larger magnitude than CWT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM), Rigshospitalet, Tagensvej 20, section M7641

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus, type 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy
  • insulin dependence
  • Contraindication to physical activity (as judged by medical history and screening)
  • Evidence of thyroid, liver, lung, kidney or heart disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
No exercise (control experiment)
Experimental: Interval Walking
A one hour interval walking exercise bout
Other Names:
  • Interval exercise
  • Interval training
Experimental: Continuous walking
A one hour continuous walking exercise bout
Other Names:
  • Continuous exercise
  • Continuous training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic control
Time Frame: Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a mixed meal tolerance test (duration: 5 hours) followed by continuous glucose monitoring (duration: 48 hours).
Glycemic control will be assessed after a one hour specific exercise intervention (control/continuous walking/interval walking) in a controlled setting (a mixed meal tolerance test). Moreover, glycemic control will be assessed during the following 2 days in a free-living environment, using continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a mixed meal tolerance test (duration: 5 hours) followed by continuous glucose monitoring (duration: 48 hours).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC)
Time Frame: Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a ventilated hood (duration: 5 hours).
EPOC will be assessed during the hours following the before-mentioned specific exercise bouts using the indirect calorimetry ventilated hood technique.
Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a ventilated hood (duration: 5 hours).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristian Karstoft, MD, Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM), Rigshospitalet, Tagensvej 20, section M7641, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Continuous walking

3
Subscribe