Intraoperative TIVA With Propofol on Postoperative Pain and Side Effects After Liver Resection Surgery

May 14, 2024 updated by: Dr. Chi-Wai Cheung, The University of Hong Kong

Retrospective Study to Investigate Intraoperative TIVA With Propofol on Postoperative Pain and Side Effects After Liver Resection Surgery

Postoperative pain can be severe after liver resection surgery. However, postoperative pain management may be difficult for this group of patients. Opioidergic neurotransmission may be altered in cirrhotic patients and selectively increasing receptor affinity for opioids. Large dose of strong opioid may be required to achieve adequate pain control. However, this may not be possible due to the side effect of opioid and liver dysfunction after liver resection.

Propofol is a commonly used anaesthetic with rapid recovery and less side effects and TIVA (total intravenous analgesia) with propofol is a common technique now. The reduction on certain serum pro- inflammatory cytokines may lead to more smooth post- surgical recovery.

Recent case report proved the analgesic effect of propofol infusion. However other animal and clinical studies showed controversial result.

The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the postoperative analgesic effects and side effects of intraoperative TIVA with propofol in patient undergoing liver resection surgery at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong between 2010 to 2012.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Retrospective audit.

Anaesthetic records and acute pain service records of patient undergone liver resection surgery between 2010 to 2012 in Queen Mary Hospital would be retrieved from the computer.

Data Collection

  1. Demographic data;
  2. Types of analgesic techniques;
  3. Type of pain relief modalities;
  4. Pain score up to 72 hours postoperatively;
  5. Postoperative opioid consumption;
  6. Incidence of adverse events during APS care;
  7. Patients' satisfaction on pain relief.

Data Analysis For summarising analysis, mean or median with standard deviation or interquartile range will be reported. Parametric and non-parametric comparative tests will be used for analysis between/among patients with various characteristics. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and log-rank test will be used for duration of APS use.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
        • Department of Anaesthesiology, the University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient undergone liver resection surgery between 2010 to 2012 in Queen Mary Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient undergone liver resection surgery between 2010 to 2012 in Queen Mary Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Essential data were missing.
  • Patient participating in other research projects.
  • Changes in postoperative pain management technique.
  • Patients could not be assessed post-operatively for pain (i.e. post-operative IPPV)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour
From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse event
Time Frame: From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour
From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour
From postoperative 1 hour to postoperative 72 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chi Wai Cheung, MD, Department of Anaesthesiology, the University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

July 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Subscribe