Effectiveness of Inelastic LSO Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Back Pain Associated With Kyphosis (ARISE)

July 1, 2014 updated by: Aspen Medical Products

A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study To Determine Clinical Effectiveness and Patient Wellness of Inelastic Lumbosacral Orthoses Versus Standard Medical Treatment in Patients With Back Pain AssociatEd With Kyphosis (The ARISE Study)

The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness and the effect on quality of life of an inelastic thoracolumbarasacral orthosis in male and female hyperkyphotic patients with moderate to severe back pain disability and to demonstrate the safety of the intervention through detailed reporting and analysis of adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate to complete disability (crippled) as defined by a score of 21% to 80% on the baseline evaluation of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire;
  • Patients diagnosed with kyphosis and have a Cobb angle of at least 55 degrees;
  • Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 19;
  • Pregnant patients or patients who are considering future pregnancies;
  • Patients who were participating in any other investigational device or drug study or whose participation in a previous investigational study within 30 days of study entry may, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, impact analysis of this orthotic;
  • Patients who, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this study; Patients who, in the investigators opinion, are mentally or legally incapacitated preventing informed consent or unable to read or understand written material;
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to return to the study center for follow-up visits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
Patients assigned to group A wore the Summit 456 TLSO (intervention) for four weeks in phase 1 of the study, followed by four weeks of observation (control) in phase 2.
Thoracolumbarsacral orthosis
Placebo Comparator: Group B
Patients assigned to group B started four weeks of observation (control) in phase 1, followed by four weeks of summit 456 TLSO (intervention) in phase 2 of the study.
Thoracolumbarsacral orthosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean difference in the Oswestry Disability Index Scores of the intervention versus control groups
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measured amount of opioid medication consumed in the intervention group versus control group
Time Frame: Baseline and weeks 2,3,4,8,12,16,20 and 24
Baseline and weeks 2,3,4,8,12,16,20 and 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ODI scores between the intervention group versus control group
Time Frame: Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
SF-26v2 Survey scores in the intervention versus the control group
Time Frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24.
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24.
Cost and return on investment of the LSO intervention
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Number of adverse events associated with the LSO intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline and weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel J Schaffer, MD, Southeastern Integrated Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CPR-ORTHO01-2012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Summit 456 TLSO

3
Subscribe