Deep-brain Magnetic Stimulation (DMS) in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (DTMS)

August 30, 2017 updated by: Gang Wang, MD, Capital Medical University

The Effectiveness of Deep-brain Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder:a Preliminary Study

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective alternative for pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder, but the effectiveness is not clear due to stimulated region, frequency and intensity of magnet field. Standard TMS techniques only can stimulate superficial cortical areas as the electric field decreases rapidly as a function of tissue depth,while depression is also interconnected with deeper neuronal regions. Deep-brain magnetic stimulation (DSM, or deep TMS, DTMS) allows stimulation of deeper cortical regions. Previous research has demonstrated that alpha frequency (8-13 Hz) EEG activity may have particular relevance to the response to antidepressants, and reduction of alpha frequency (8-13 Hz) could lead to negative symptoms. It has been reported that both alpha frequency and low-field magnetic stimulation could improve depressive symptoms.

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the two different parameters of DMS in the treatment of major depressive disorder. The changes of brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) are also investigated to make a relevant analysis of the improvement of depressive symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is designed as randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled trial in major depressive disorder.

Patients will be male or female, 18 to 60 years of age, right-handed, outpatient or inpatient status, with diagnosis of major depressive episode (single or recurrent) by DSM-IV. The HAMD-17 total score is no less than 18 at enrollment. The patients should be drug free at least 30 days before entering the trial. The eligible patients are randomized to one of the two treatment groups using a 1:1 ratio for the alpha frequency (high frequency) and 0.5Hz (low frequency) groups.

Throughout the course of the study, DMS sessions are administered by trained physicians for 20 minutes at a time, with 5 sessions per week, during 6 consecutive weeks. Raters who are blinded to the treatment arm perform evaluations. The effective outcome is assessed by the HAMD-17 and HAMA every two weeks including randomization. Serum BDNF level are also tested at each visits (Week 0, 2, 4 and 6). The safety in this study will be assessed by adverse event reporting, clinical laboratory measurements and physical examinations.

Primary efficacy measure will be assessed based on the decrease of HAMD-17 from randomization to endpoint (Week 6).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100088
        • Beijing Anding Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has given written informed consent.
  • Aged from 18 to 60 years old.
  • Has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder by DSM-IV criteria.
  • HAMD-17 ≥ 18.
  • Right-handed.
  • Be drug free at least 30 days at randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current Axis I primary psychiatric diagnosis other than major depressive disorder.
  • Organic mental disease, including mental retardation.
  • History of clinically significant disease, including any cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematologic, endocrinologic, or neurologic disease, or clinically significant laboratory abnormality that is not stabilized or is anticipated to require treatment during the study.
  • Subjects receiving an investigational agent (including different formulation and generic agents of investigational drug) in the previous 3 months prior to screening.
  • Women in pregnancy or lactation, or female of child bearing potential without appropriate birth control measures.
  • Has received ECT or MECT within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Significant risk of suicidal and/or self-harm behaviors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: High frequency stimulation
alpha burst, 8~12Hz, run 2 seconds, rest 8 seconds, lasts 20 minutes each time
The parameter of DMS: alpha frequency
Other Names:
  • Alpha frequency stimulation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Low frequency stimulation
0.5Hz, run 0.5 seconds, rest 1.5 seconds, lasts 20 minutes each time
The parameter of DMS: 0.5Hz
Other Names:
  • 0.5Hz stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of Depression
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint(Week 6)
the Change of 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) total score
From randomization to endpoint(Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of Anxiety
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
the Change of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) total score
From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
Remission rate
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with HAMD-17≤7
From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
Response rate
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with the reduction of HAMD-17 total score>=50%
From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
Safety outcome 1
Time Frame: From enrollment to endpoint (Week 6)
The incidence and nature of adverse events
From enrollment to endpoint (Week 6)
Safety outcome 2
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
The number of subject withdrawal due to adverse events
From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BDNF change
Time Frame: From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)
Change of serum BDNF level
From randomization to endpoint (Week 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on High frequency stimulation

3
Subscribe