A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Genetic Variation Treatment Algorithm Versus Treatment As Usual for Management Of Depression (MOD)

October 19, 2018 updated by: Mark Frye, Mayo Clinic

A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Genetic Variation Treatment Algorithm Versus Treatment As Usual for Management of Depression

The overall goal of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the treatment outcome of depression utilizing platform algorithm products that can allow rapid identification of pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) genomic variation. This new technology may have the potential to optimize treatment selection by improving response, minimizing unfavorable adverse events / side effects and increasing treatment adherence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Treatment seeking depressed patients (SCID confirmed major depressive disorder or bipolar I/II disorder) to the Mayo Clinic Depression Center will be invited to participate in this study evaluating the Assurex GeneSight® platform; this new technology can rapidly assess PK and PD genetic variation that can potentially impact antidepressant, antipsychotic, and stimulant associated treatment outcomes for depression. This study will recruit treatment seeking patients with major depression with an index episode of moderate symptom severity that has been unresponsive or poorly tolerated to at least one prior antidepressant treatment. This will be an 8-week, double-blind trial where depressed patients are randomized to testing results of GeneSight® (tricolored clinical report) prior to treatment selection (n=138) vs. treatment as usual (tricolored dummy report) (n=138). All testing results will be made available after the 8-week trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-65, male or female, any race/ethnicity
  2. Mayo Clinic Depression Center inpatient or outpatient, or an outpatient of Mayo Clinic Rochester and satellite clinics, and outpatients from Mayo Clinic Health System clinics
  3. Ability to provide informed consent
  4. Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) confirmed major depressive episode associated with Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I/II disorder, or Schizoaffective Bipolar Disorder
  5. Current index episode of major depression < 2 years duration
  6. Moderate symptom severity defined by HAMD-17 rating scale score ≥ 17 [8]
  7. Current index episode having not been treated with psychotropic medications or inadequately responsive to treatment (IRT). IRT defined as intolerability, adverse event, or inadequate efficacy of current psychotropic medication (at least 4 weeks duration)
  8. Agree to abide by the study protocol and its restrictions and be able to complete all aspects of the study, including all visits and tests
  9. Negative serum or urine pregnancy test (or history of hysterectomy)
  10. Negative urine toxicology test (will only be completed at the request of the treating clinician).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to speak English
  2. Inability or lack of willingness to provide informed consent
  3. Axis I or II disorder other than depression (i.e., by clinical assessment) that is the primary reason for treatment
  4. Psychotropic medication change (including dosage) between screening & baseline visit with exception of no more than 8mg of Ativan within a 24-hour period.
  5. Patients who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for any significant current substance use disorder other than nicotine or caffeine. Must have at least early, partial or full, remission X 3 months
  6. Clinically diagnosed cannabis use disorder, or SCID confirmed cannabis abuse or dependence.
  7. Current clinical diagnosis delirium, dementia, other cognitive disorders, or non-mood psychotic disorder (i.e., schizophrenia, delusional disorder)
  8. Index episode symptoms of hallucinations or delusions
  9. Serious suicidal risk and/or in need of immediate hospitalization as judged by the investigator
  10. History of hypothyroidism unless taking a stable dose of thyroid medication and asymptomatic for 6 months
  11. Significant unstable medical condition
  12. Hepatic insufficiency (2.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) for Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ), past liver transplant recipient, and/or clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver
  13. Malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma) and/or chemotherapy within 1 year prior to screening; malignancy more than 1 year prior to screening must have been local and without metastasis and/or recurrence, and if treated with chemotherapy, without nervous system complications
  14. Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days of the screening visit
  15. Anticipated inability to attend scheduled study visits
  16. Patients who in the judgment of the Investigator may be unreliable or uncooperative with the evaluation procedure outlined in this protocol
  17. Known cytochrome (CYP) & serotonin transporter genomic testing results within 5 years
  18. A score of ≥15 on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GeneSight guided treatment
GeneSight guided group will have their research psychiatrist make treatment recommendations based on AssureRx GeneSight genotyping results.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual group
Treatment as usual group will have treatment recommendations based on clinical judgment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depression as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-C16)
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores >/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.
baseline, 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects with improvement of depressive symptoms as shown by 50% reduction in QIDS-C16 score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores >/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.
8 weeks
Number of subjects with improvement of depressive symptoms as shown by a score <6 on QIDS-C16
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The QIDS-C16 is a 16-item scale that is clinician-rated; it is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS-C16 total score ranges from 0-27. Scores ranging from 0 to 10 correspond with no to mild depression, while scores >/= 11 correspond to moderate to severe depression. A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression.
8 weeks
Number of subjects with improvement of depressive symptoms as shown by score of "much" or "very much improved" on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. and rated as: 1. Very much improved, 2. Much improved, 3. Minimally improved, 4. No change, 5. Minimally worse, 6. Much worse, 7. Very much worse
8 weeks
Improvement of depressive symptoms as shown by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The HAMD-17 is a 17-item scale that evaluates depressed mood, vegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression, and co-morbid anxiety symptoms. The 17 items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale. In general, the 5 point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=doubtful to mild; 2=mild to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe. The 3-point scale items use a rating of 0=absent; 1=probable or mild; 2=definite. The total HAMD-17 score ranges from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). A negative change indicates improvement in the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms, and a positive change indicates a worsening of the subject's depression/anxiety symptoms.
8 weeks
Improvement of depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Treatment adherence based on concordance vs. non-concordance of gene test results and clinical intervention.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Frye, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as usual

Subscribe