Comparison Between 4 Different Nasal Dilators

July 9, 2024 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Comparison Between 4 Different Nasal Dilators: Objective vs Subjective Parameters

Several nasal dilators are currently commercially available, and can be applied endonasally (Airmax°, Nozovent and Nasanita°) or externally (Breath Right°). An objective comparison between these dilators has not been made so far, and would help the clinicians to advise the use of any of these dilators. From clinical experience, endonasal dilators are well supported and improve breathing better than the external dilators

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Several nasal dilators are currently commercially available, and can be applied endonasally (Airmax°, Nozovent and Nasanita°) or externally (Breath Right°). An objective comparison between these dilators has not been made so far,

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vlaams-Brabant
      • Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with nasal obstruction due to external nasal valve problems and with positive Cottle sign.

Age > 18 and < 60 years. Ability to give reliable information and written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with nasal obstruction due to other endonasal anatomic deformities besides external nasal valve dysfunction.

Patients with rhinosinusitis and/or nasal polyps evaluated by nasal endoscopy. Patients with chronic lower airway disease like severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis and/or other conditions that interfere with the generation of a reliable Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) result.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Nozovent
Nasal Dilator
Active Comparator: Nasanita
Nasal Dilator
Nasal Dilator
Other Names:
  • Nasanita
Active Comparator: Breath Right
Nasal Dilator
Active Comparator: Airmax
Nasal Dilator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Nasal Inflammatory Flow
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change in Peak Nasal Inflammatory Flow between the 4 different dilators
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
preference
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Patients' preference of 2 out of 4 dilators tested at baseline for a trial period of 4 week duration.
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
surgery
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Patients' preference to continue to use the preferred dilator after the 4 weeks' trial period or choice to undergo surgery after one month of usage of the preferred dilator.
4 weeks
reasons of choice
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Specific reasons for the choice of the two dilators at baseline (functional vs aesthetic) at baseline
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Hellings, Prof Dr, UZ Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

July 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S56842

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incompetence of Nasal Valve

Clinical Trials on Nasal dilator Nozovent

Subscribe