A Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Esomeprazole and Ranitidine Treatment of Dyspeptic Pain

July 18, 2014 updated by: hayri elicabuk, Pamukkale University

A Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Esomeprazole and Ranitidine Treatment of Dyspeptic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

  • Currently, Proton Pump Inhibitors and H2Receptor Blockers are widely used by emergency physicians in Turkey for the treatment of patients with dyspepsia.
  • The objective of the study was to assess whether intravenous esomeprazol has superior dyspeptic pain reduction compared with ranitidine or hydrotalcid in emergency department (ED) adults
  • The investigators second aim was to compare recurrent dyspeptic pain within 24 hours after discharge and cost of treatments in the treatment of dyspepsia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • this is the placebo randomized double blinded clinical trial to compare the efficacy of these three drugs in this clinical setting.
  • A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the ED of Pamukkale University Medical Faculty Hospital
  • Study personnel (emergency physicians and nurses) were trained before the study.
  • When intravenous drugs (esomeprazol, ranitidine or plasebo) was being recommended, an eligibility checklist was completed by the attending physician.
  • If there were no exclusion criteria, written informed consent was obtained and baseline information, including initial dispeptic pain severity ratings with VAS were recorded.
  • The need for identification and enrollment of participants by staff with conflicting work pressures resulted in recruitment of a convenience sample of patients.
  • All patients eligible for the study were randomized to one of three groups:
  • First Group: 40 mg Esomeprozol with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
  • Second Group: 50mg Ranitidin with 5 cc syringe in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
  • Third Group: 150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hidrotalcid
  • Drug packs prepared in 5 ml syringes were numbered by an independent nurse, who not involved in the study.
  • Drug packs were prepared according to the computer-generated random number sequence to assign treatment allocations
  • The allocation list was kept by the emergency nurse. Patients received the esomeprazol, the ranitidin or the placebo medication schemes according to their random allocations.
  • After enrollment and recording of baseline information, the next numbered study drug pack was obtained, and administered as a infusion over 15 minutes.
  • Randomization was achieved by using computer software to generate random numbers. During the intervention, participants were monitored by an oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitor, an automatic sphygmomanometer (blood pressure), and a rhythm monitor (heart rate and rhythms)
  • One researcher blinded to patient allocation observed the whole procedure and recorded the dyspeptic pain scores.
  • Patients in both groups received three types of medication in a similar manner (for example, 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes), thus ensuring double blinding.
  • Dyspeptic pain scores were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min on a VAS of 1 to 10
  • Rescue medication [hidrotalcid 10ml (Talcid, Bayer, Istanbul, Turkey)] was given intravenously to patients if dyspeptic pain VAS scores ≥ 5 in thirty minutes after study drug administration.
  • All other medications required during the study also were recorded.
  • During the study, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded at baseline (0 min), 15, 30, and 60 min.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey, 20000
        • Pamukkale Universty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, 60 years or older,
  • had dyspspsia [VAS (visual analog scale) score >5] during their ED episode of care for which the attending physician recommended medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pretreatment 100-mm linear visual analog scale (VAS) pain score less than 50 mm;
  • known cases of malignancy or terminal illness;
  • known cases of major medical problems (eg, any evidence of active structural or functional abnormality of the hearts, chronic renal failure)
  • allergy or previous adverse reaction to study drugs studied
  • received agents to inhibit the secretion of acid (PPIs or histamine-2 receptor antagonists), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
  • who consumed alcohol within 4 hours before the ED visit
  • diarrhea more than 2 times within the past 24 hours;
  • being suspected to have other ED diagnoses (eg, gut obstruction, biliary colic, pancreatitis, hepatitis, or localized hepatobiliary infections);
  • being pregnant or breast-feeding; and
  • inability to comprehend the VAS evaluation.
  • and patients who refused to participate study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Esomeprazole
40 mg Esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
40 mg esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Nexium, Astra Zeneca drugs, Södertalje
  • Esmara
  • Esom
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Talcid, Bayer, Istanbul
EXPERIMENTAL: Ranitidine
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
40 mg esomeprazole in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Nexium, Astra Zeneca drugs, Södertalje
  • Esmara
  • Esom
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Ulcuran, Abfar drugs, Istanbul
  • Ranitab
  • Ultidin
EXPERIMENTAL: placebo
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
150 ml only normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Talcid, Bayer, Istanbul
50mg Ranitidine in 150 ml normal saline given as a slow intravenous infusion over 15 minutes and p.o. 10ml Hydrotalcid
Other Names:
  • Ulcuran, Abfar drugs, Istanbul
  • Ranitab
  • Ultidin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
compare the effects of intravenous esomeprazol and ranitidin for the treatment of dyspepsia in the emergency setting.
Time Frame: Patients in both groups received three types of medication than dyspeptic pain scores were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min on a VAS of 1 to 10.
This work took 17 months
Patients in both groups received three types of medication than dyspeptic pain scores were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min on a VAS of 1 to 10.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: hayri elicabuk, md, Pamukkale Universty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspepsia

Clinical Trials on esomeprazole

3
Subscribe