Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?

February 2, 2017 updated by: David C. Ring, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Title Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More? Primary null hypothesis Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.

Secondary null hypotheses

  • There is no correlation in overall pain intensity after open CTR surgery and distal sensory latency, distal motor latency, electromyography (EMG), demographics, occupation, avocation, relevant comorbidities, dominance, left vs. right, Pain Self-Efficacy, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity or PROMIS depression when both surgeries are performed within 6 months.
  • There is no difference in satisfaction with treatment at the time of suture removal after the first and second open CTR surgery when both are performed within 6 months..

IRB: 2009-p-001-019 ClinicalTrials.gov: Not mandatory, (b/o observational) Authors: Drijkoningen, Braun, Ring Journal: To be discussed Design: Prospective cohort study Background Many hand surgeons note that patients undergoing staged bilateral open carpal tunnel release often experience more pain with the second side. The investigator felt this was an easily testable hypothesis worthy of study.

Subjects

Eligibility:

Inclusion:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
  • No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome

Exclude:

  • Pregnant women
  • Not fluent in English

Response Variables:

  • 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity during and after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
  • 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment
  • PROMIS upper extremity

Explanatory Variables:

  • Distal Sensory Latency (DSL)
  • Distal Motor Latency (DML)
  • EMG changes
  • Demographics: age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
  • Time limit between two surgeries < 6 months
  • Relevant comorbidities: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
  • Involved hand (Dominance, Side)
  • First side vs. second side surgery
  • PROMIS Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)
  • Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)
  • PROMIS Depression

Methods The investigator and study staff will invite all adult patients (age 18 and older) presenting to the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service Department at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome planning staged bilateral carpal tunnel release.

Analysis Power analysis An a priori power analysis for matched pairs was performed. To detect the difference between two dependent means an effect size of 0.5 at alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, a total sample size of 34 patients is needed.As the investigator expects to have patients who will be lost to follow-up the investigators will count 10% extra, a total of 38 patients will be needed.

Univariate analysis: Variables will be presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range for respectively normal or non-normal distributed continuous variables. Normality of continuous distributed variables will be tested a paired T-Test.

Bivariate and multivariable analysis will be performed and subsequently all variables with a probability < 0.10 in bivariate analysis will be inserted in a backward, stepwise, multivariable linear regression analysis to assess their ability to explain variation in outcome. The 11 point Likert Pain scale score is considered significant when there is a difference of more than 1.4 points (2.8 SD*0.5 effect size)on a scale from 1-10.[9]

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Bilateral CTS patients undergoing bilateral carpal tunnel release

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
  • No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
The overall pain intensity is measured on an 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within a 6 month timeframe
11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment measured 2 weeks after surgery during suture removal
2 weeks after surgery within a 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Outcome for Upper Extremity Function
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
PROMIS upper extremity
2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Electromyogram Results
Time Frame: Before Surgery
EMG DSL and DML
Before Surgery
Demographics
Time Frame: 2 weeks after first surgery
Age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
2 weeks after first surgery
Comorbidities
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Relevant comorbidities: TMC Arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
2 weeks after surgery
Hand Dominance and Side of Surgery
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
2 weeks after surgery
Patient Reported Pain Interference
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
PROMIS Pain Interference (CAT)
2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Self Efficacy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
PSEQ-2
2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Depression
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
PROMIS Depression
2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Subscribe