The Role of Circulating Soluble CD74 in Acute Lung Injury

January 2, 2017 updated by: Zhaofan Xia, Changhai Hospital

Relationship Between Elevated Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 74 (CD74) and Severity of Experimental and Clinical ALI/ARDS.

Efforts to identify circulating factors that predict severity of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome(ALI/ARDS) patients is unrevealing. The primary purpose of this study is to verify our hypothesis that soluble CD74 might be a potential novel ALI/ARDS biomarker.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a devastating cause of morbidity and mortality characterized by alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury. Despite recent advances in pathogenetic mechanisms and therapy strategies of ALI, efforts to identify circulating factors that predict severity of ALI/ARDS patients have been unrevealing.

CD74 (also known as a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II invariant chain) is a type II transmembrane protein, recently found to be the high-affinity receptor of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). MIF promotes neutrophil accumulation in alveolar space via binding to CD74 expressed on the cell surface. Our previous study, consistent with others, has shown that MIF was highly expressed in acute lung injury (ALI). In addition, we also detected highly CD74 expression in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI mouse model. Recently, a circulating form of CD74 was discovered in autoimmune liver disease. Similarly, we investigated the existence of soluble form of CD74 in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in ALI mouse model and burn or trauma related ALI patients. Based on these finds, we postulated that soluble CD74 might participate in regulating lung inflammation and be a potential novel ALI/ARDS biomarker.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Department of Burn and Trauma Sugery, Changhai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with and without ARDS were screened from Changhai Hospital. Patients were enrolled consecutively over a 2-year time period (2014-2015). All enrolled patients with ALI met the American-European Consensus Committee criteria.In addition, healthy individuals were recruited from the general population.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of ALI/ARDS
  • Informed consent was obtained from either the subjects themselves or from designated surrogates before enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have chronic lung disease before enrollment.
  • Patients who have severe organ dysfunction, autoimmune diseases and tumor.
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the Investigator, have any other medical condition which renders the patient unable to complete the study or which would interfere with optimal participation in the study or produce significant risk to the patient.
  • Patients participating in or planning to enroll in another clinical trial during the time of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
ARDS patients
Eighty-one patients were enrolled consecutively over a two-year time period (2014-2015) and identified as ARDS prospectively according to the Berlin definitions of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society on ARDS. Exclusion criteria were an age of less than 16 years, pregnancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to medical history and failure to obtain informed consent.
Healthy volunteers
Fifty-eight healthy volunteers recruited from the general population who had no significant medical history and no medications were categorized as control patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: up to 28 days
up to 28 days
Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2)/Partial Arterial Oxygen Pressure (PO2)
Time Frame: up to 28 days
up to 28 days
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Scores
Time Frame: up to 28 days
APACHE II scores range from 0 to 71. A higher values represent a worse outcome.
up to 28 days
Serum Soluble Cluster of Differentiations 74 (sCD74)
Time Frame: Day 1
The concentration of sCD74 was determined using Elx800 (BioTek Instruments, Inc. VT), and normalization was based on concentration-response curves, using CD74 recombinant protein.
Day 1
Serum Soluble Cluster of Differentiations 74 (sCD74)
Time Frame: Day 3
The concentration of sCD74 was determined using Elx800 (BioTek Instruments, Inc. VT), and normalization was based on concentration-response curves, using CD74 recombinant protein.
Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Length of Stay in the ICU
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Days of Unassisted Ventilation
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Death
Time Frame: up to 28 days
up to 28 days
TNF-α
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
IL-6
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3
MIF
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zhaofan Xia, MD PhD, Department of Burn Sugery, Changhai Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Subscribe