Performance Evaluation of the Micromedic BRONJ Risk Assessment in Vitro Diagnostic Assay (BRONJ)

August 14, 2014 updated by: Micromedic Technologies Ltd

Performance Evaluation of the Micromedic BRONJ Risk Assessment in Vitro Diagnostic Assay.

To evaluate the performance of the Micromedic BRONJ Risk Assessment in vitro assay (the "BRONJ Assay") in identifying Multiple Myeloma (MM) and/or other cancer subjects at risk for developing Bisphosphonate-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ) following intravenous (IV) administration of Bisphosphonates (BP).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Micromedic BRONJ Assay is intended for the qualitative analysis of genetic changes which may be indicative of increased risk to develop BRONJ osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) following IV administration of drugs of the Bisphosphonate family.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tel Hashomer, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Sheba Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Noam Yarom, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria Study Group (all of the following):

  1. Subject is ≥18 years old
  2. Subject is or was a Multiple Myeloma and/or other cancer patient who is or has been IV treated with the BP zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium; Or; Subject is or was a Multiple Myeloma and/or other cancer patient who is or has been IV treated with the BP zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium and was also treated by oral BP such as sodium alendronate, and in the opinion of the PI, IV treatment was significant enough to be considered as the cause for BRONJ
  3. Subject has been diagnosed with BRONJ at stages 1 or 2 or 3 according to AAOMS (American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
  4. Subject has signed the informed consent or consent can be waived

Inclusion Criteria Control Group (all of the following):

  1. Subject is ≥18 years old
  2. Subject is or was a Multiple Myeloma and/or other cancer patient who is, or has been IV treated with the BP zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium for at least two (2) years (continuously or cumulatively)
  3. Subject has not developed any signs or symptoms of BRONJ
  4. Subject has signed the informed consent or consent can be waived

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has been treated with irradiation to the jaws or head and neck at levels exceeding 35 Gy
  2. Pregnant or lactating women
  3. Subject has been treated with either bevacizumab or sunitimib
  4. Subject has been treated with Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study Group
Subject has been diagnosed with BRONJ
collection of the blood sample from the subject for evaluation of the Micromedic BRONJ Risk Assessment in vitro Diagnostic Assay
No Intervention: Control Group
Subject has not developed any signs or symptoms of BRONJ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
For each subject, the primary endpoint is the presence or absence of SNPs or other genetic alterations obtained from the assay for blood samples
Time Frame: up to 2 years
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
For each subject, the secondary endpoint is the presence or absence of additional/alternative SNPs or other genetic alterations using GWAS analysis and/or Full Exome Sequencing (FES) from the assay for blood samples
Time Frame: up to 2 years
up to 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety endpoints will include adverse events (AEs), including serious AEs (SAEs) whether or not deemed related to study procedures
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noam Yarom, Dr., Sheba MC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bisphosphonate-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

3
Subscribe