Investigation of a Physiotherapist and Nurse Practitioner Intervention for Chronic Low Back Disorders Delivered Through Telehealth

October 10, 2018 updated by: Brenna Bath, University of Saskatchewan

Advancing Interprofessional Primary Health Care Services in Rural Settings for People With Chronic Low Back Disorders: Investigation of a Physiotherapist and Nurse Practitioner Intervention Delivered Through Telehealth

The purpose of this project is to compare "usual care" for chronic low back disorders in a rural setting (nurse practitioner/NP) to two different means of integrating Physical Therapy (PT) into a rural health care team:

  1. in-person PT assessment, where the PT travels from an urban center
  2. interprofessional Telehealth assessment where the local NP is joined by a PT via Telehealth.

The project will evaluate health, systems and process outcomes, comparative effectiveness and costs of the three methods of assessment. The hypothesis is that an interprofessional Telehealth assessment with be as effective as an in-person PT assessment, but more effective than usual care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study design will include two intervention groups and a control group with 20 participants in each group: 1. interprofessional videoconferencing intervention, 2. in-person PT and, 3. "usual-care" provided by a NP. Due to the interprofessional nature of the intervention, the NP involved in the telehealth-based intervention group may alter their "usual care" practice; therefore, the control group participants will be drawn from the practices of 2 NPs not involved in the Telehealth intervention providing services out of a different clinic. Each PT and the NP alone will complete a standardized online diagnostic classification tool.Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7J4W3
        • University of Saskatchewan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult 18-80
  • low back pain and/or related leg pain affecting function, >3 months duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • clients within a third party payer insurance coverage system
  • clients with primarily neck or thoracic pain
  • clients with language or comprehension difficulties that would limit completion of paperwork

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Usual Care (NP)
Rural NP with client in-person, usual care
usual NP management of chronic low back disorder
Active Comparator: PT in-person
Urban PT travels to rural area to manage patient's back pain in-person.
Includes manual therapy, education, exercise
Active Comparator: PT/NP Telehealth
Intervention: Rural NP is joined by PT via Telehealth for interprofessional videoconference with patient
Includes manual therapy, education, exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short term impact of patient/provider satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after assessment
questionnaire
up to 2 weeks after assessment
Short term outcome of patient experience with Telehealth
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
qualitative questionnaire
up to 2 weeks
Medium term outcome of patient and provider satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
questionnaire
3 months
Short term impact of patient function
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after assessment
Modified Oswestry Disability questionnaire
up to 2 weeks after assessment
Short term impact on pain
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after assessment
Numeric Pain Rating Scale - questionnaire
up to 2 weeks after assessment
Short term impact on quality of life
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after assessment
Euro-Qol health survey instrument (EQ-5D)
up to 2 weeks after assessment
Medium term impact on pain
Time Frame: 3 months
Numeric Pain Rating Scale - questionnaire
3 months
Medium term impact on quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Euro-Qol health survey instrument (EQ-5D)
3 months
Medium impact on patient function
Time Frame: 3 months
Modified Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost effectiveness of each of 3 arms of study
Time Frame: 6 months
patient diaries
6 months
Long term outcome on patient/provider satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
questionnaire
6 months
Long term impact on quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
Euro-Qol health survey instrument (EQ-5D)
6 months
Long term impact on function
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire
6 months
Long term impact on pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barriers and facilitators to use of Telehealth
Time Frame: 2 weeks
questionnaire
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brenna Bath, PhD, School of Physical Therapy, University of Saskatchewan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on NP face to face management of Chronic Low Back Pain

3
Subscribe