IV Ibuprofen for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

February 5, 2020 updated by: David M Troendle, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic technique utilized to diagnose and treat pathologic conditions involving the ducts draining the liver and pancreas. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication following ERCP and occurs in approximately 11% of children undergoing the procedure. By definition it leads to prolongation of hospital stay or delays in care and rarely can result in long-term morbidity or even death. Recent adult trials have demonstrated prevention of PEP with administration of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). To date, no studies have been performed in children thus no "gold standard" or even commonly accepted method of preventing PEP in the pediatric population exist. Studying an IV NSAID such as ibuprofen has distinct advantages over rectally administered NSAIDs in the pediatric population in that it would allow for more consistent weight based dosing and would have more predictable absorption compared to suppository. Thus, this project proposes a pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of IV ibuprofen at preventing PEP in the pediatric population. The design of the proposed study is a prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing IV Ibuprofen to placebo controls (normal saline) at the time of procedure in patients undergoing ERCP at Children's Medical Center Dallas over a two-year period. The primary outcome measurement will be development of PEP. Post-ERCP bleeding and change in pre- and post- procedural pain scores will also be measured. The hypothesis is that IV Ibuprofen administered at the time of ERCP will decrease rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis in pediatric patients.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Children's Medical Center of Dallas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age<=18 years
  • Undergoing ERCP (defined as cannulation of the major or minor papilla) for any indication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18
  • Pancreatitis within the 72 hours preceding ERCP
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to Aspirin or NSAID medications
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding mother
  • Cr >1.4
  • Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in preceding 72 hours
  • Heart disease reliant upon a patient ductus arteriosis
  • History of sickle cell disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ibuprofen
Single dose IV Ibuprofen at a dose of 10mg/kg (max: 800mg).
Other Names:
  • Caldolor
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Single dose IV normal saline
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Number of patients who develop post-ERCP pancreatitis
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-ERCP Bleeding
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Number of patients who develop post-ERCP bleeding
2 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increased Pain Score
Time Frame: pre-procedural, 24 hours
Number of patients with increased pain scores after the procedure
pre-procedural, 24 hours
24-h Post-ERCP Pain Score
Time Frame: pre-procedural, 24 hours
Pain score recorded 24-hrs after the ERCP was performed as recorded on a 10-point Likert pain scale (0= lowest value, no pain, 10=highest value, severe pain)
pre-procedural, 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Troendle, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical Trials on placebo

Subscribe