24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy (SMART)

March 3, 2017 updated by: AstraZeneca

SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy

SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared with Acarbose when in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

689

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 150 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  2. Men and women (non-pregnant and using a medically approved birth-control method) aged at least 18 years at screening.
  3. T2D patients treated with stable metformin monotherapy for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. Metformin dose should be ≥ 1500 mg/day (or individual maximally tolerated dose), but not more than the maximum dose specified in the label
  4. HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 11.0% at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory) and HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11.0% at pre-randomization visit (by central laboratory)
  5. FPG ≤ 13.3 mmol/L (≤ 240 mg/dL) at pre-randomization visit (by central laboratory)
  6. Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to comply with the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who are pregnant, intending to become pregnant during the study period, lactating females, or women of child-bearing potential not using highly effective, medically approved birth control methods.
  2. Diagnosis or history of:

    1. Type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury or secondary forms of diabetes, eg, acromegaly or Cushing's syndrome.
    2. Acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma within the past 6 months.
  3. Previous treatment with any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonists within the past one year.
  4. History of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, exfoliative skin conditions) to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4) or Acarbose.
  5. Treatment with any anti-diabetic medication for more than 7 consecutive days other than metformin in the last 8 weeks prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Saxagliptin
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd.
Other Names:
  • Onglyza
Active Comparator: Acarbose
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose.
Other Names:
  • Glucobay

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
From baseline to 24 week
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
The primary endpoint was analyzed based on Per protocol analysis set as the supportive analysis.
From baseline to 24 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients with any gastrointestinal adverse events.
24 weeks
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c<7.0%
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Secondary Objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c<7.0%
24 weeks
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving HbA1c<7.0% Without GI Adverse Events
Time Frame: Whole study duration
Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% without GI adverse events.
Whole study duration
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
From baseline to 24 week
Change From Baseline in 2H Postprandial Glucose (2HPPG)
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
From baseline to 24 week
Change From Baseline in HOMA-β
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function was estimated by the Homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β), which was defined as fasting insulin (mU/mL) x 20 / (fasting glucose (mmol/mL) - 3.5, body weight at week 24
From baseline to 24 week
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 week
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
From baseline to 24 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Saxagliptin

3
Subscribe