- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02274077
Transverse Abdominal Plane Anesthesia for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Postoperative Outcomes Using Transverse Abdominal Plane Anesthesia
The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term postoperative outcomes in the abdominal wall reconstruction population using an intraoperative local anesthetic infusion. A prospective randomized double blind study of patients undergoing component separation will be performed in order to assess the following outcomes:
- Length of Stay (LOS)
- Return of bowel function
- Narcotic pain medication requirements
- Nausea and emesis
- Pain scores
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
One group will be the control group (group A) and the other will be the study group (group B). Neither patient nor physician will know which group they have been assigned. Informed consent will be obtained during pre-operative evaluation in the clinic prior to the day of surgery as stated above. Relevant medical history will be entered into a secure database. Information collected will include patient demographics, medical co-morbidities, history of prior procedures, preoperative pain scores, postoperative nausea, emesis, pain scores, dermatomal anesthesia, adjuvant narcotic usage, return of bowel function and length of stay (LOS).
Patients will be randomly separated into 2 groups at the time of surgery through the randomization log of the investigational drug service (IDS) pharmacy. At the request of the attending surgeon a solution will be prepared and delivered to the operating room in a blinded fashion concealed within a shielded vial.
During the abdominal component separation, dissection of the tissue planes housing the sensory fibers will be exposed to allow insertion of a large spinal needle under direct visualization on each side of the abdominal wall. Depending on the study group, the attending surgeon will inject an unknown solution (solution A or B) of either 30ml of Exparel ((bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 1.3% ( 13.3mg/ml)). The final test solution will be prepared in the IDS pharmacy by adding a 20 mL Exparel vial and 40cc of normal saline for a total of 60cc with a bupivacaine concentration of 0.44%. This will then be split into two 30cc solutions to be injected into each side of the transverse abdominal plane. A patient in the placebo group will be injected with 30cc of Normal Saline into the TAP region on each side of the abdomen.
All patients, independent of their study group will be provided with Patient Controlled Analgesics (PCA) using Hydromorphone or orally dosed narcotic/acetaminophen combo analgesics to ensure adequate post-operative pain control. The pain scores, dermatomal level of anesthesia, nausea, emesis, return of bowel function and length of stay will be logged into the electronic medical record. Once data collection is complete the groups will be revealed and all of the data will undergo statistical analysis.
Study Type
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
- University of Rochester Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects to be included are all competent patients, 18 years of age or older, who undergo abdominal component separation for a hernia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not having abdominal component separation or are receiving another form of regional anesthesia will be excluded.
- Patients younger than 18 years of age will be excluded.
- Amide-type local anesthetics, such as bupivacaine, are metabolized by the liver.
- Patients' with hepatic disease, because of their inability to metabolize local anesthetics normally, are at a greater risk of developing toxic plasma concentrations and will therefore be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: EXPAREL
Bilateral, one time injections using 30ml of EXPAREL ((bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) 1.3% ( 13.3mg/ml)) into the transverse abdominal plane at the time of abdominal component separation.
A total of 60cc used with a Bupivacaine concentration of 0.44%.
|
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline
Bilateral, one time injections of 30ml normal saline into the transverse abdominal plane at the time of abdominal component separation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
length of stay
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
determine the length of hospital stay after surgery
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
postoperative nausea
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
evaluate the presence or absence of postoperative nausea
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
postoperative emesis
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
evaluate for the presence or absence of postoperative emesis
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
postoperative return of bowel function
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
record when bowel function returns following surgery
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
postoperative pain score
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
assess pain score 0-10 a various time points following surgery
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
adjunct narcotic pain medication use
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
quantify the amount of adjunct narcotic pain medication used following surgery to indirectly assess pain control obtained from the TAP block
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Howard N Langstein, MD, University of Rochester Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1552-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318232d4c1.
- Heller L, Kowalski AM, Wei C, Butler CE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of local anesthetic infusion and intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia pump for pain management after free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1010-1018. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181858c09.
- Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Sep;86(3):519-26. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023.
- Girotto JA, Chiaramonte M, Menon NG, Singh N, Silverman R, Tufaro AP, Nahabedian M, Goldberg NH, Manson PN. Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long-term superiority of autologous tissue repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;112(1):106-14. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000066162.18720.C8.
- Shestak KC, Edington HJ, Johnson RR. The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications, and limitations revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Feb;105(2):731-8; quiz 739. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200002000-00041.
- Ewart CJ, Lankford AB, Gamboa MG. Successful closure of abdominal wall hernias using the components separation technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Mar;50(3):269-73; discussion 273-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000046911.07345.0d.
- Kampe S, Warm M, Kasper SM, Diefenbach C. Concept for postoperative analgesia after pedicled TRAM flaps: continuous wound instillation with 0.2% ropivacaine via multilumen catheters. A report of two cases. Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;56(5):478-83. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00180-2.
- Hivelin M, Wyniecki A, Plaud B, Marty J, Lantieri L. Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after breast reconstruction by DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):44-55. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174090.
- Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02215.x. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
- McDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.03.011.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RSRB00042032
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hernia, Ventral
-
Varazdin General HospitalCompletedIncisional Ventral Hernia | Recurrent Ventral HerniaCroatia
-
Anne Arundel Health System Research InstituteMedtronic - MITGCompletedGrade I Ventral Hernia | Grade II Ventral HerniaUnited States
-
Sofregen Medical, Inc.TerminatedVentral Hernia RepairUnited States
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingVentral Hernia RepairFrance
-
Makassed General HospitalSuspended
-
Zaza DemetrashviliRecruitingLarge Midline Ventral HerniaGeorgia
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCompleted
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCopenhagen University Hospital at HerlevCompleted
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenBelgian Section for Abdominal Wall Surgery, section of the Royal Belgian...Not yet recruitingVentral Incisional Hernia
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Normal Saline
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research FoundationSuspendedVentricular ArrythmiaUnited States
-
The Catholic University of KoreaCompleted
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research FoundationCompleted
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoWithdrawn
-
MemorialCare Health SystemCompletedLength of Labor | Second Stage of Labor | Intravenous Hydration of LaborUnited States
-
University of HaifaWestern Galilee Hospital-NahariyaRecruiting
-
McMaster UniversityGlaxoSmithKline; University of ManchesterRecruitingAsthma | Eosinophilic Bronchitis | Chronic CoughCanada
-
University of MichiganRadiological Society of North AmericaTerminated
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUnited States Department of DefenseWithdrawn
-
Qassim UniversityCompletedApical Periodontitis | Post Operative Pain | Dental Pulp NecrosesSaudi Arabia