A Follow-net Investigation of a Randomised Study of Cystoscopy and Urethral Dilatation Versus Cystoscopy Alone in Women With Overactive Bladder Syndrome and Impaired Voiding

October 13, 2016 updated by: Professor Jonathan Duckett, Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Urinary incontinences is a highly prevalent and distressing condition which has a significant impact on health related quality of life in millions of women worldwide. Of all women with incontinence, 90% will have overactive bladder symptoms (OAB), and 50% will have detrusor overactivity (DO) on cystometry. The overactive bladder syndrome is defined by the International Continence society as "Urinary urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia if there is a no infection or proven pathology" (Abrams et al 2002)

Initial management of OAB and DO consists of conservative measures such as altering fluid intake, bladder retraining and drug therapy. The next step consists of interventions such as cystoscopy and urethral dilatation, on the basis that it will allow intrinsic bladder problems such as interstitial cystitis to excluded, excluded, and may confer a symptomatic benefit.

The original study showed no benefit of urethral dilatation versus no dilatation at 6 months follow up (Duckett 2007). The investigators do not know the natural history of patients with voiding dysfunction. Therefore reviewing their symptoms will give a better idea of what happens to these patients symptoms over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Urinary incontinences is a highly prevalent and distressing condition which has a significant impact on health related quality of life in millions of women worldwide. Of all women with incontinence, 90% will have overactive bladder symptoms (OAB), and 50% will have detrusor overactivity (DO) on cystometry. The overactive bladder syndrome is defined by the International Continence society as "Urinary urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia if there is a no infection or proven pathology" (Abrams et al 2002)

Initial management of OAB and DO consists of conservative measures such as altering fluid intake, bladder retraining and drug therapy. The next step consists of interventions such as cystoscopy and urethral dilatation, on the basis that it will allow intrinsic bladder problems such as interstitial cystitis to excluded, excluded, and may confer a symptomatic benefit.

Cystoscopy and urethral dilatation have long been advocated as empirical treatments for women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). A review of the literature reveals a marked lack of evidence regarding the survey of practice amongst UK urologists found that 61% had performed urethral dilatation 7 or more times during the year in which the survey was conducted, although 55% believed that less than half of the patients experience long term improvement (Masarani and Willis, 2006)

The original study showed no benefit of urethral dilatation versus no dilatation at 6 months follow up (Duckett 2007). The investigators do not know the natural history of patients with voiding dysfunction. Therefore reviewing their symptoms will give a better idea of what happens to these patients symptoms over time. The aim of the study is to identify any long term benefit from urethral dilatation over cystoscopy alone.

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Entry to the study will be offered to all women previously recruited into the original randomised controlled trial. This study is a 3 year follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Patients will be sent a letter offering a review appointment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant Overactive Bladder Symptoms

    • Based on scoring 1 or 2 on the Urgency Perception Scale
    • On the symptoms domain of the KHQ
    • More than 8 voids per day on frequency volume chart +/- 2 or more episodes of nocturia
  2. Pressure flow studies demonstrate a maximum flow rate of less than 15ml on a minimum voided volume of 200ml with a high or normal detrusor pressure at maximum flow or post-void residual of 200ml or over
  3. Patients must be able to give informed consent for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of concurrent urodynamic stress incontinence.
  2. Patients with bladder pathology or haematuria of unknown origin.
  3. Patients with neurological disorders (as these may affect voiding).
  4. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse requiring intervention
  5. Patients with bladder pathology (including urinary tract infection) or haematuria of unknown origin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cystoscopy Alone
Patients who received cystoscopy only for treatment of OAB and voiding dysfunction.
Cystoscopy performed for investigation and treatment of OAB and voiding dysfunction
Cystoscopy & Urethral Dilatation
Patients who received urethral dilatation and cystoscopy for treatment of OAB and voiding dysfunction.
Cystoscopy and urethral dilatation performed for investigation and treatment of OAB and voiding dysfunction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICIQ-Fluts questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 years
To identify if there is any long term benefit from urethral dilatation over cystoscopy alone. Their baseline symptoms will be assessed and compared to those identified at baseline in the previous study.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
King's Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 years
To identify if there is any long term benefit from urethral dilatation over cystoscopy alone. Their baseline symptoms will be assessed and compared to those identified at baseline in the previous study.
3 years
Urgency Perception Scale Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 years
To identify if there is any long term benefit from urethral dilatation over cystoscopy alone. Their baseline symptoms will be assessed and compared to those identified at baseline in the previous study.
3 years
Uroflowmetry
Time Frame: 3 years
Flow rates will be repeated in all patients allowing for an objective comparison post-operatively and 3 years later.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan RA Duckett, FRCOG, MBChB, Medway Maritime Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Cystoscopy only

Subscribe