Comparing Different Treatments in Reducing Dissociative Seizure Occurrence (CODES)

October 7, 2020 updated by: King's College London

COgnitive Behavioural Therapy Versus Standardised Medical Care for Adults With Dissociative Non-Epileptic Seizures: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial (CODES)

The study will test the hypothesis that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy plus Standardised Medical Care (SMC) will have greater clinical and cost effectiveness than SMC alone in treating adult patients with dissociative seizures which had not initially ceased after diagnosis.

About 12-20% of patients who attend neurology or specialist epilepsy clinics because of seizures do not in fact have epilepsy. Most of these people have what are referred to as dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures (DS). This means that they have episodes that resemble epileptic seizures but which have no medical reason for their occurrence and instead are due to psychological factors. In younger adults DS are about four times more common in women than men. A high percentage of these people will have other psychological or psychiatric problems and may have other medically unexplained symptoms. It is generally thought that people with DS will benefit from psychological treatments. However, studies on this have been small or have not compared the psychological therapy with the treatment people normally receive (standardised medical care). There is some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), which is a widely accepted talking therapy that focuses on the person's thoughts, emotions and behaviour, as well as considering the physical reactions and sensations that may occur in people's bodies, may lead to a reduction in how often people have DS. The investigators have previously developed a CBT package for people with DS. In a relatively small study by our group, published in 2010, people receiving CBT overall showed greater reduction in how often they had their DS. The investigators are now conducting a larger study, across several different hospitals, to obtain more definite results about the effectiveness of our CBT approach for DS.

The investigators aim to invite ~ 500 adult patients with DS (but without current active epilepsy), who have been given their diagnosis by a neurologist or specialist in epilepsy, to take part in their study. Up to 698 might be invited if insufficient patients are progressing to the RCT.

The investigators will collect initial information about these people and ask them to keep a record of how often they have their DS following diagnosis. Three months after the diagnosis, those who have agreed to take part in the study will be seen by a psychiatrist, who will undertake a psychiatric assessment and ask them about factors which may have led to the development of their DS. Patients who have continued to have DS in the previous 8 weeks and who meet other eligibility criteria and are willing to take part in the trial, will be randomly allocated to standardised medical care or CBT (plus standardised medical care) as further treatment for their seizures. These people will be asked to continue to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires, provide regular seizure frequency data following receipt of DS diagnosis and will need to be willing to attend weekly/fortnightly sessions if allocated to CBT. The investigators initially aim to randomise 298 people (149 to each study arm) although now allow for up to 356 to account for loss to follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is an initial observational phase to this study followed by a parallel group, two-arm multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (interventional phase).

In the observational phase patients will be given their diagnosis of dissociative seizures by a neurologist/epilepsy specialist and will be told about the CODES study. In addition to a leaflet on dissociative seizures they will, if interested in the study and are willing to be referred to a psychiatrist, be given an information sheet about DS and about the study and the doctor will document their agreement to be contacted by a research nurse/worker. This person will arrange to contact them, clarify study details, obtain informed consent, collect demographic details and explain seizure diary recording. They will then contact the patient fortnightly (bi-weekly)for seizure data. The investigators initially aim to recruit ~500 patients at this stage.

After 3 months the patient will be reviewed by a neuropsychiatrist/ liaison psychiatrist/ psychiatrist with interest in DS who will undertake a clinical assessment, review the patient's eligibility for the interventional phase of the study and if eligible will explain the RCT. Patients will be given a further leaflet on DS and a Participant Information Sheet and the psychiatrist will document interested patients' willingness to again be contacted by a research nurse/worker. That person will then explain the RCT in greater detail, obtain informed consent, undertake a baseline assessment including a MINI and instruct patients to keep seizure records for which data will be collected fortnightly. .Randomisation of between 298 and 356 people (depending on follow-up rates) to either CBT plus standardised medical care (SMC) or to SMC alone will occur after informed consent has been obtained and baseline measures have been collected. The stratification factor will be liaison/neuropsychiatry centre. The research workers and trial statistician will remain blinded. Computer-generated randomisation will be conducted remotely (for more details see www.ctu.co.uk - randomisation - advanced) by the King's Clinical Trials Unit (KCTU) at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. The investigators will maintain strict allocation concealment. The investigators will test the RWs' blinding by asking them to record when they think that allocation was revealed and record the group to which they thought patients had been allocated.

CBT will be delivered over 12 sessions (each approximately one hour in length) over a 4-5 month period with one booster session at 9 months post randomisation. The investigators' treatment model has been developed from a single case study, trialled in an open label study and then in a Pilot RCT. The model is based on the two-process fear escape-avoidance model and conceptualises DS as dissociative responses to cues (cognitive/emotional/physiological or environmental) that may (but not in all cases) have been associated with profoundly distressing or life-threatening experiences, such as abuse or trauma, at an earlier stage in the person's life and which have previously produced intolerable feelings of fear and distress. Written handouts supplement the content of face-to face therapy sessions. The investigators will record therapy sessions and undertake treatment fidelity ratings. Therapists will receive training prior to treating study patients.

Neurologists and psychiatrists with an interest in DS will deliver standardised medical care (SMC). They will have guidelines as to the delivery of standardised medical care. Information leaflets will be given to the patients. The research team will provide this material. SMC by psychiatrists will include support, consideration of psychiatric comorbidities and any associated drug treatment and general review but no CBT techniques.

The investigators allow for some local variation in the number of neurology and psychiatry SMC sessions after randomisation.

Measures will be recorded at baseline, six months and 12 months post randomisation. In addition to quantitative analyses, a nested qualitative study will investigate experiences of CBT and SMC and factors acting as facilitators and barriers to participation, as well as of healthcare professionals'.experiences of delivering the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

368

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bakewell, United Kingdom, DE45 1AD
        • Derbyshire Community Health Services Nhs Trust
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
        • University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B1 3RB
        • Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
      • Bracknell, United Kingdom, RG12 1LD
        • Berkshire Healthcare Nhs Foundation Trust
      • Brighton, United Kingdom, BN2 5BE
        • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB21 5EF
        • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Nhs Foundation Trust
      • Canterbury, United Kingdom, CT1 3NG
        • East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
      • Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 4XW
        • Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
      • Chesterfield, United Kingdom, S44 5BL
        • Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Dartford, United Kingdom, DA2 8DA
        • Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust
      • Derby, United Kingdom, DE22 3LZ
        • Derbyshire healthcare NHS foundation trust
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
        • NHS Lothian
      • Gillingham, United Kingdom, ME7 5NY
        • Medway NHS Foundation Trust
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
        • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS15 8ZB
        • Leeds Partnerships Nhs Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2PG
        • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
        • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
        • Barts and the London NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 6LP
        • East London NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE13 6LH
        • Lewisham Healthcare Nhs Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 8AZ
        • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 7DJ
        • South West London and St George'S Mental Health Nhs Trust
      • Maidstone, United Kingdom, ME16 9QQ
        • Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
        • The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE6 4QD
        • Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
      • Reading, United Kingdom, RG1 5AN
        • Royal Berkshire NHS foundation trust
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S5 7AU
        • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 3TH
        • Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust
      • Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • University Hospital Southhampton NHS Trust
      • St. Leonards-on-sea, United Kingdom, TN37 7PT
        • East Sussex Healthcare Nhs Trust
      • Thornton Heath, United Kingdom, CR7 7YE
        • Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
      • Uxbridge, United Kingdom, UB1 3EU
        • West London Mental Health Nhs Foundation Trust
      • West Malling, United Kingdom, ME19 4AX
        • Kent and Medway Nhs and Social Care Partnership Trust
      • Worthing, United Kingdom, BN11 2DH
        • Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Worthing, United Kingdom, BN13 3EP
        • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The inclusion criteria applied at the initial recruitment stage will be as follows:

    • adults (≥18yrs) with DS that have continued to occur within the previous 8 weeks and have been confirmed by video EEG telemetry or, where not achievable, clinical consensus; patients who have chronic DS can be included if they have been seen by the relevant Study Neurologist who has reviewed their diagnosis and communicated this to them according to the Study protocol
    • ability to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires;
    • willingness to complete seizure diaries regularly and undergo psychiatric assessment 3 months after DS diagnosis;
    • no documented history of intellectual disabilities;
    • ability to give written informed consent.
  2. Inclusion criteria evaluated at the randomisation stage will be as follows:

    • adults (≥18yrs) with DS initially recruited at point of diagnosis;
    • willingness to continue to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires;
    • provision of regular seizure frequency data following receipt of DS diagnosis;
    • willingness to attend weekly/fortnightly sessions if randomised to CBT
    • both clinician and patient think that randomisation is acceptable
    • ability to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria applied at the initial recruitment stage will be as follows:

  • having a diagnosis of current epileptic seizures as well as DS. Patients with both DS and ES have been included in small studies but there is no method for verifying that patients can accurately differentiate between epileptic seizures and DS;
  • inability to keep seizure records or complete questionnaires independently;
  • meeting DSM-IV criteria for current drug/alcohol dependence;
  • insufficient command of English to later undergo CBT without an interpreter or to complete questionnaires independently. Reasons for this include the need to self-rate secondary outcomes using scales not validated for non-English speaking populations, the considerable cost and uncertainty of being able reliably to engage sufficiently competent interpreters, and the need to demonstrate the delivery of therapy in terms of quality and manual adherence.
  • having previously undergone a CBT-based treatment for dissociative seizures at a trial participating centre
  • currently having CBT for another disorder, if this will not have ended by the time that the psychiatric assessment takes place.

Exclusion criteria evaluated at the randomisation stage will be as follows:

  • current epileptic seizures as well as DS, for reasons given above;
  • not having had any DS in the 8 weeks prior to the psychiatric assessment, 3 months post diagnosis;
  • having previously undergone a CBT-based treatment for dissociative seizures at a trial participating centre
  • currently having CBT for another disorder
  • active psychosis;
  • meeting DSM-IV criteria for current drug/alcohol dependence; this may exacerbate symptoms/alter psychiatric state and health service use and affect recording of seizures;
  • current benzodiazepine use exceeding the equivalent of 10mg diazepam/day;
  • the patient is thought to be at imminent risk of self harm, after (neuro)psychiatric assessment or structured psychiatric assessment by the Research Worker with the MINI, followed by consultation with the psychiatrist.
  • known diagnosis of Factitious Disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBT+SMC
12 sessions of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy adapted for DS (plus one booster session) plus standardised medical care

12 sessions of CBT (over 4-5 months) +1 booster session. Guided by a therapy manual and patient handouts; will involve setting homework tasks. Although treatment is manualised, it allows treatment to be formulation-based i.e. tailored to the person.

Standardised medical as described in other intervention.

Delivered by neurologists/ psychiatrists - both will be involved in discussing diagnosis. It will Include an information sheet about dissociative seizures and direction to self-help websites, general information provision about management of DS and support, consideration of psychiatric comorbidities / associated drug treatment and general review but no CBT techniques.
Other Names:
  • Treatment as usual
Active Comparator: SMC
Standardised medical care provide by neurologist and/or psychiatrist
Delivered by neurologists/ psychiatrists - both will be involved in discussing diagnosis. It will Include an information sheet about dissociative seizures and direction to self-help websites, general information provision about management of DS and support, consideration of psychiatric comorbidities / associated drug treatment and general review but no CBT techniques.
Other Names:
  • Treatment as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in seizure frequency
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation,
Monthly DS frequency
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation,

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in informant rating
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
A rating by an informant as to whether compared to study entry seizure frequency is worse the same better or whether they are seizure free; data collected 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain participant involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only;
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in self-rated seizure severity
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Two items from the Seizure Severity Scale (Cramer et al., 2002), asking how severe and bothersome DS were in the past month; data collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Seizure freedom
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Patient's self-reported longest period of seizure freedom between the 6- and 12-month follow-up and whether or not the patient is seizure free in the last 3 months of the trial; data collected 12 months post randomisation; the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
>50% reduction in seizure frequency
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
The number of patients in each group who at the 6- and 12-month follow-up show >50% reduction in seizure frequency, compared to baseline (pre-randomisation); data collected at baseline and 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Health-related QoL using the SF-12v2 (Ware et al.,1996); data collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in QALYs
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
We will use EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol group, 1990), a 5-domain, 5-level, multi-attribute scale collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in psychosocial functioning
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (Mundt et al 2002) collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in psychiatric symptoms and psychological distress
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
We will measure anxiety, depression and somatisation with the GAD7 (Spitzer et al., 2006), PHQ9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) and an extended PHQ15 (Kroenke et al., 2002; Sharpe et al., 2010), derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire which reflects DSM-IV diagnoses. We will also use a general measure of psychological distress, the CORE-10 (Connell & Barkham, 2007); this assesses self-reported global psychological distress; data collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in patients self-rated global outcome and satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
CGI Clinical Global Impression (Guy 1976) change score yields a self-rated global measure collected at 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are only collected for data modelling and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Clinician rating of change
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
The CGI change scale will be rated by CBT therapists at the end of session 12 and by the SMC doctor at the 12-month follow-up.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in health service use and informal care (self-report)
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (Beecham & Knapp, 2001); data collected at baseline (recorded pre-randomisation) , 6 & 12 months post randomisation; 6 month measures are collected for data modelling and to give a total health service use over the 12 months of the post-randomisation period and to maintain patient involvement but the trial endpoint was measured at 12 months only.
Outcome assessed at 12 month post randomisation only
Change in health service use
Time Frame: Outcome assessed at 12 months post randomisation
Linkage data sets from NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (Hospital Episode Statistics) eDRIS (NHS National Services Scotland Information Services Division (ISD) and Wales (NHS Wales Informatics Service)
Outcome assessed at 12 months post randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura H Goldstein, PhD MPhil, King's College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conversion Disorder

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3
Subscribe