Study of Different Etiologic Diagnostic Methods in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

May 1, 2018 updated by: Rodrigo Miquelanti Melo, Federal University of Uberlandia

Prospective Comparative Study of Different Etiologic Diagnostic Methods in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

The study is designed to evaluate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage and endotracheal aspirate in comparison with bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (gold standard), as methods for etiologic diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia and their impact in morbimortality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ventilator associated pneumonia is defined as one that occurs 48-72h after tracheal intubation, is classified into early and late and is responsible for a mortality of 24-50% to almost 70% in some studies.

The clinical suspicion of ventilator associated pneumonia is based on the finding of new or progressive pulmonary opacity associated with two or more variables such as: fever, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and purulent pulmonary secretions.

Some studies show that the etiologic diagnosis reduces spectrum of antimicrobials and bacterial resistance, reducing hospital stay and time of mechanical ventilation, as well as treatment costs. The collection of material for quantitative culture ensures greater specificity however there is no standard method.

The investigator's hypothesis is that collection of material to confirm the etiologic diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia, held by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, define the etiology in a larger number of patients when compared to the endotracheal aspirate and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage.

The primary goal is evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive methods (endotracheal aspirate and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage) in comparison with invasive (bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage) regarding the collection of material for etiologic diagnosis.

The secondary objectives are determine the prevalence of ventilator associated pneumonia and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated, helping to update empirical antibiotic therapy protocols.

This is a prospective comparative observational study on etiologic methods of diagnosis. All the patients, with clinical suspicion, will be submitted to collection of tracheal aspirate, bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage. These procedures are already incorporated in the daily practice of our intensive cara unit and are routinely performed for investigation of patients with compatible framework of ventilator associated pneumonia, as availability of bronchoscopist.

Whereas an analysis of variance will be performed to compare the three interventions, with a minimum difference between the treatment means, a power of 0.95 and a significance level of 0.05, with an estimation error of 0.1, will be required a total sample of 72 patients.There will be only one group of 72 patients, in which will be held in all the three samples of the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minas Gerais
      • Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 38405320
        • Rodrigo Miquelanti Melo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients older than 18 years admitted to the ICU of Hospital de Clínicas de Uberlândia with suspected VAP will be included in the project. from february 2015 to complete the total of 72 patients required, since provided that agree with the terms of informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 and clinical suspicion of VAP;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years;
  • Introduction or modification of antibiotic therapy due to associated diagnosis in the first 3 days of the start of the protocol;
  • No agreement with informed consent or for any other reason, expose the desire to leave the protocol at any time.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
VAP suspects
Collect tracheal and pulmonary secretions. All patients (n: 72) will be submitted to endotracheal aspirate, bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage.
Collect tracheal and pulmonary secretions (endotracheal aspirate, bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy
Time Frame: 30 days

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of noninvasive methods (endotracheal aspirate and non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage) in comparison with invasive method (bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, considered gold standard).

Sensitivity: number of true positive cultures obtained with each noninvasive method divided by the number of positive cultures obtained from bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage;

Specificity: number of true negative cultures obtained with each noninvasive method divided by the number of negative cultures obtained from bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage;

Accuracy: number of true positive plus true negative cultures obtained with each noninvasive method divided by the number of patients (72);

30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of ventilator associated pneumonia (cases / time period)
Time Frame: 10 months
Number of cases of ventilator associated pneumonia divided by the number of months. We hope to reach the number of 72 patients in up to 10 months.
10 months
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated
Time Frame: 72-96 hours
All isolated bacteria will be submitted to tests for antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance pattern.
72-96 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo Melo, Federal University of Uberlândia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We are still collecting data.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Collect tracheal and pulmonary secretions

Subscribe